Search: section 68

3 results for “section 68”+ Section 25Fclear

Sorted by relevance

Chandigarh3 Mumbai1

Key Topics

Section 1018 Addition to Income3 Section 10(10)2 Section 25F2 Section 143(1)2 Exemption2

NIRMALA RANI L/H OF SH. AZAD SINGH,PINJORE vs. ITO, WARD -1, , PANCHKULA

In the result, Ground No. 2 of the assessee is allowed

ITA 452/CHANDI/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh26 Nov 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: The Appeal Is Finally Heard & Disposed Of.

For Appellant: Smt. Neelam Dhiman, CAFor Respondent: Dr. Ranjit Kaur, Addl. CIT, Sr. DR

Section 10Section 10(10)Section 25FSection 89(1)

68, Panchkula Shiv Shakti Colony, Pinjore-134102 "ायी लेखा सं./PAN NO: AJBPS8427P अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""थ"/Respondent Assessee by : Smt. Neelam Dhiman, CA Revenue by : Dr. Ranjit Kaur, Addl. CIT, Sr. DR Date of Hearing : 09/10/2024 Date of Pronouncement : 26/11/2024 Order PER VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, A.M. : This is an appeal filed by the Assessee against the order

NIRMALA RANI L/H OF SH. AZAD SINGH,PINJORE vs. ITO, WARD -1, , PANCHKULA

NIRMALA RANI L/H OF SH. AZAD SINGH,PINJORE vs. ITO, WARD -1, , PANCHKULA

SH. SOHAN LAL,PINJORE vs. ITO, WARD -3, PANCHKULA

SH. MARTIN EKKA S/O SH. LALSAY EKKA,PANCHKULA vs. ITO, WARD -1, PANCHKULA