BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “section 68”+ Section 206C(6)clear

Sorted by relevance

Bangalore81Delhi61Chennai36Karnataka21Mumbai20Ahmedabad15Jaipur9Chandigarh7Kolkata5Indore4Rajkot4Hyderabad3Varanasi2Cuttack2Agra2Raipur1Amritsar1SC1Uttarakhand1Cochin1

Key Topics

Section 206C43Section 2066Section 1396Section 201(1)6Section 406TDS6Section 682Section 1472

SH. SANDEEP KUMAR,LUDHIANA vs. ITO, WARD-4, KHANNA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 313/CHANDI/2023[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh09 Jan 2024AY 2010-11

Bench: SHRI. AAKASH DEEP JAIN (Vice President), SHRI. VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Kuldeep Singh, ITP and Shri M.P. S. Malhotra, ITPFor Respondent: Shri Dharam Vir, JCIT, Sr. DR
Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 206CSection 68

68 of the Act, without confronting the assessee with any information in her possession which shows that the assessee had made payment of Rs 839,191/- and the source of which he had failed to explain. 5.2 It was submitted that the information received by the AO, copy of which is placed in paper book, shows that it is based

PUNJAB INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT BOARD,CHANDIGARH vs. JCIT (TDS), CHANDIGARH

ITA 788/CHANDI/2014[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh29 Mar 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Ms. Annapurna Gupta

For Appellant: Sh. Deepak Aggarwal, CAFor Respondent: Sh. Manjit Singh, Sr. DR
Section 139Section 201(1)Section 206Section 206CSection 40

68 & 64 of 2016 dated 20.12.2016 and separate orders dated 9.5.2017 in ITA Nos. 65, 69, 97 & 98 (O&M) of 2016 respectively to decide as to whether the assessee herein before us namely ‘Punjab Infrastructure Development Board’ (herein referred to as ‘ PIDB’) was required to collect tax at source (TCS) as per the provisions of section

M/S PUNJAB INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT BOARD,CHANDIGARH vs. ACIT (TDS), CHANDIGARH

ITA 881/CHANDI/2013[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh29 Mar 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Ms. Annapurna Gupta

For Appellant: Sh. Deepak Aggarwal, CAFor Respondent: Sh. Manjit Singh, Sr. DR
Section 139Section 201(1)Section 206Section 206CSection 40

68 & 64 of 2016 dated 20.12.2016 and separate orders dated 9.5.2017 in ITA Nos. 65, 69, 97 & 98 (O&M) of 2016 respectively to decide as to whether the assessee herein before us namely ‘Punjab Infrastructure Development Board’ (herein referred to as ‘ PIDB’) was required to collect tax at source (TCS) as per the provisions of section

PUNJAB INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT BOARD,CHANDIGARH vs. JCIT (TDS), CHANDIGARH

ITA 790/CHANDI/2014[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh29 Mar 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Ms. Annapurna Gupta

For Appellant: Sh. Deepak Aggarwal, CAFor Respondent: Sh. Manjit Singh, Sr. DR
Section 139Section 201(1)Section 206Section 206CSection 40

68 & 64 of 2016 dated 20.12.2016 and separate orders dated 9.5.2017 in ITA Nos. 65, 69, 97 & 98 (O&M) of 2016 respectively to decide as to whether the assessee herein before us namely ‘Punjab Infrastructure Development Board’ (herein referred to as ‘ PIDB’) was required to collect tax at source (TCS) as per the provisions of section

M/S PUNJAB INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT BOARD,CHANDIGARH vs. ACIT (TDS), CHANDIGARH

ITA 880/CHANDI/2013[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh29 Mar 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Ms. Annapurna Gupta

For Appellant: Sh. Deepak Aggarwal, CAFor Respondent: Sh. Manjit Singh, Sr. DR
Section 139Section 201(1)Section 206Section 206CSection 40

68 & 64 of 2016 dated 20.12.2016 and separate orders dated 9.5.2017 in ITA Nos. 65, 69, 97 & 98 (O&M) of 2016 respectively to decide as to whether the assessee herein before us namely ‘Punjab Infrastructure Development Board’ (herein referred to as ‘ PIDB’) was required to collect tax at source (TCS) as per the provisions of section

PUNJAB INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT BOARD,CHANDIGARH vs. JCIT (TDS), CHANDIGARH

ITA 789/CHANDI/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh29 Mar 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Ms. Annapurna Gupta

For Appellant: Sh. Deepak Aggarwal, CAFor Respondent: Sh. Manjit Singh, Sr. DR
Section 139Section 201(1)Section 206Section 206CSection 40

68 & 64 of 2016 dated 20.12.2016 and separate orders dated 9.5.2017 in ITA Nos. 65, 69, 97 & 98 (O&M) of 2016 respectively to decide as to whether the assessee herein before us namely ‘Punjab Infrastructure Development Board’ (herein referred to as ‘ PIDB’) was required to collect tax at source (TCS) as per the provisions of section

PUNJAB INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT BOARD,CHANDIGARH vs. JCIT (TDS), CHANDIGARH

ITA 791/CHANDI/2014[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh29 Mar 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Ms. Annapurna Gupta

For Appellant: Sh. Deepak Aggarwal, CAFor Respondent: Sh. Manjit Singh, Sr. DR
Section 139Section 201(1)Section 206Section 206CSection 40

68 & 64 of 2016 dated 20.12.2016 and separate orders dated 9.5.2017 in ITA Nos. 65, 69, 97 & 98 (O&M) of 2016 respectively to decide as to whether the assessee herein before us namely ‘Punjab Infrastructure Development Board’ (herein referred to as ‘ PIDB’) was required to collect tax at source (TCS) as per the provisions of section