BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “reassessment u/s 147”+ Section 54Fclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi48Jaipur26Mumbai23Chennai22Bangalore21Hyderabad19Ahmedabad10Pune10Indore10Kolkata9Raipur8Patna8Agra6Chandigarh6Visakhapatnam5Lucknow4Jodhpur4Karnataka2Surat2Amritsar1Allahabad1Nagpur1Dehradun1

Key Topics

Section 139(1)9Section 153A9Section 1476Section 246Section 1326Deduction6Section 1485Section 54F5Section 545

SHRI MOHAN LAL GUPTA,SHIMLA vs. PR.CIT-1, CHANDIGARH

In the result, appeal of the Assessee is partly allowed

ITA 119/CHANDI/2021[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh04 Jan 2024AY 2011-12

Bench: SHRI. AAKASH DEEP JAIN (Vice President), SHRI. VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Vishal Mohan, Sr. Advocate with Shri Aditya Sood, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Kusum, CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 263Section 54F

54F of the Act, we find that the same are clearly emerging from the reassessment order passed u/s 143(3) r/w 147 of the Act and the impugned revisionary order so passed by the ld PCIT setting aside the reassessment order is thus not barred by limitation as the limitation period will start from passing of the reassessment order

Addition to Income5
Disallowance4
Long Term Capital Gains3

SIKANDER SINGH MALUKA,MOHALI vs. ITO, MOHALI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for

ITA 633/CHANDI/2017[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh17 May 2018AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Ms. Annapurna Guptathe I.T.O., Vs. Sh.Sikandar Singh Maluka, Ward 5(1), # 1370, Sector 40-B, Chandigarh. Chandigarh Pan: Abzpm7206N & Sh.Sikandar Singh Maluka, Vs. The I.T.O., # 1370, Sector 40-B, Ward 5(2), Chandigarh. Chandigarh Pan: Abzpm7206N

For Appellant: Shri T.N. Singla, CAFor Respondent: Shri Manjit Singh
Section 147Section 148Section 2(47)(ii)Section 2(47)(v)Section 269Section 53ASection 54

section 147 of the Act has now been initiated as per the provisions of the Act after obtaining the approval from the competent Authority. 4. In the light of facts adduced above, it is therefore evident that notice u/s 148 of the I.T. Act, dated 26/28.3.2014 was issued after obtaining mandatory sanction from appropriate authority i.e. JCIT, Range-V, Chandigarh

AMARJIT SINGH MARWAHA ,SHIMLA vs. ITO, NATIONAL FACELESS APPEAL CENTRE, DELHI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 1379/CHANDI/2025[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh28 Jan 2026AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadavआयकर अपील सं./ Ita No. 1379/Chd/2025 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2013-14 Shri Amarjit Singh Marwaha, The Ito, Cottage No.1, Sadhora, Vs Ward-1, Mashobra, Baldeyan, Shimla. Shimla. "थायी लेखा सं./Pan No: Aeepm0161N अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent Assessee By : Shri Vishal Mohan Sr.Advocate, With Shri Abhinav Bijwaria, Advocate Revenue By : Shri Vivek Vardhan, Addl. Cit Sr.Dr Date Of Hearing : 21.01.2026 Date Of Pronouncement : 28.01.2026

For Appellant: Shri Vishal Mohan Sr.Advocate, with Shri Abhinav Bijwaria, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Vivek Vardhan, Addl. CIT Sr.DR
Section 144BSection 147Section 148Section 45Section 54Section 54F

147 read with Section 144B of the Income Tax Act. The ld. AO has taken A.Y.2013-14 3 cognizance of the computation made by the assessee of alleged Long Term Capital Gain. The AO has observed that 50% share of the property falls in the hands of the assessee, thus, total sale consideration was Rs.38,75,000/-. He has given benefit

SHRI DINESH DUA,DELHI vs. DCIT, CHANDIGARH

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is treated as partly

ITA 378/CHANDI/2016[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh07 Sept 2018AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Ms. Annapurna Guptaassessment Year : 2008-09

For Appellant: Sh. S.K. Bhasin, CAFor Respondent: Sh. Manoj Mishra, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 139(1)Section 143(2)Section 153ASection 24

147 (income escaping assessment) and 263(revision of orders) of the Act. The Hon’ble High Court has further observed that the words “assess” or “re-assess” have been used at more than one place in the section and a harmonious construction of the entire provision would lead to an irresistible conclusion that the word ‘assess’ has been used

SH.DINESH DUA,DELHI vs. DCIT, CHANDIGARH

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is treated as partly

ITA 379/CHANDI/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh07 Sept 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Ms. Annapurna Guptaassessment Year : 2008-09

For Appellant: Sh. S.K. Bhasin, CAFor Respondent: Sh. Manoj Mishra, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 139(1)Section 143(2)Section 153ASection 24

147 (income escaping assessment) and 263(revision of orders) of the Act. The Hon’ble High Court has further observed that the words “assess” or “re-assess” have been used at more than one place in the section and a harmonious construction of the entire provision would lead to an irresistible conclusion that the word ‘assess’ has been used

SH. DINESH DUA,DELHI vs. DCIT, CHANDIGARH

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is treated as partly

ITA 395/CHANDI/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh07 Sept 2018AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Ms. Annapurna Guptaassessment Year : 2008-09

For Appellant: Sh. S.K. Bhasin, CAFor Respondent: Sh. Manoj Mishra, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 139(1)Section 143(2)Section 153ASection 24

147 (income escaping assessment) and 263(revision of orders) of the Act. The Hon’ble High Court has further observed that the words “assess” or “re-assess” have been used at more than one place in the section and a harmonious construction of the entire provision would lead to an irresistible conclusion that the word ‘assess’ has been used