Search: penalty u/s 271

4 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 12Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Hyderabad33 Bangalore32 Delhi29 Mumbai24 Jaipur13 Visakhapatnam12 Indore8 Allahabad8 Lucknow8 Pune7 Cochin6 Patna4 Amritsar4 Chandigarh4 Ahmedabad3 Kolkata2 Raipur2 Jodhpur2 Nagpur1 Rajkot1 Surat1

Key Topics

Section 143(2)7 Section 142(1)5 Section 113 Section 270A2 Section 12A2 Section 2502 Section 2532 Section 80I2 Exemption2 Penalty

M/S APEEJAY EDUCATION SOCIETY,JALANDHAR vs. DCIT, C-1 (EXEMPTIONS), CHANDIGARH

In the result, the appeal is allowed

ITA 706/CHANDI/2022[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh01 May 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: SHRI A.D.JAIN (Vice President), SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Salil Kapoor, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Amanpreet Kaur, Sr.DR

Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 271(1)(b)

Section 271(1)(b). 4. That the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (A)fell into grave error by confirming the penalty of Rs. 10,000/-. 2. The Assessing Officer (in short ‘the AO’), while imposing penalty in question, vide order dated 15.10.2019, observed as follows : "Vide notice u/s 142(1) dated 30.08.2019 the assessee was asked to submit some information/documents

M/S APEEJAY EDUCATION SOCIETY,JALANDHAR vs. DCIT, C-1 (EXEMPTIONS), CHANDIGARH

M/S ASHA TECHNOLOGIES,SIRMOUR vs. ADDL. CIT, SOLAN

M/S APEEJAY EDUCATION SOCIETY,JALANDHAR vs. DCIT, C-1 (EXEMPTIONS), CHANDIGARH

M/S ASHA TECHNOLOGIES,SIRMOUR vs. ADDL. CIT, SOLAN

M/S ASHA TECHNOLOGIES,KALA AMB vs. ITO, SIRMOUR

M/S UFV INDIA GLOBAL EDUCATION (SOCIETY),CHANDIGARH vs. DCIT, EXEMPTION CIRCLE-1, CHANDIGARH