Search: penalty u/s 271

3 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 10Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi48 Mumbai27 Bangalore15 Jaipur14 Chennai14 Hyderabad12 Chandigarh3 Patna2 Pune2

Key Topics

Section 143(2)7 Section 80I3 Deduction3 Section 2502 Section 2532 Section 142(1)2

MAHESH T. PRASANA,MUMBAI vs. ITO, WARD-1, PARWANOO

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 419/CHANDI/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh18 Oct 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri A.D.Jain & Shri Krinwant Sahayआयकर अपील सं./Ita No. 419/Chd/2023 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2012-13

For Appellant: Shri Nikhil Goyal, Advocate, &For Respondent: Dr. Ranjit Kaur, Addl.CIT, Sr. DR

Section 143(2)Section 80I

penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the ITA 419/CHD/2023 A.Y. 2012-13 6 Income Tax Act. 6. We have considered the submissions filed by the Revenue on this issue as well as the detailed affidavit filed by the assessee on this issue of condonation of delay. We find that the Revenue has conceded that the Dispatch Register

M/S ASHA TECHNOLOGIES,SIRMOUR vs. ADDL. CIT, SOLAN

In the result, both the above appeals of the Assessee are partly allowed as aforesaid in respect of impugned orders dt

MAHESH T. PRASANA,MUMBAI vs. ITO, WARD-1, PARWANOO

M/S ASHA TECHNOLOGIES,SIRMOUR vs. ADDL. CIT, SOLAN

MAHESH T. PRASANA,MUMBAI vs. ITO, WARD-1, PARWANOO

M/S ASHA TECHNOLOGIES,SIRMOUR vs. ADDL. CIT, SOLAN

M/S ASHA TECHNOLOGIES,KALA AMB vs. ITO, SIRMOUR