BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “house property”+ Section 80Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi47Mumbai35Jaipur33Bangalore26Pune10Chennai9Cochin9Lucknow7Kolkata6Telangana6Hyderabad5Cuttack4Surat4Nagpur3Ahmedabad3Indore3Raipur3Visakhapatnam2Chandigarh2Jodhpur2SC1Karnataka1Amritsar1Allahabad1

Key Topics

Section 2634Section 80C3Section 143(3)3Section 682Section 242

ANJULA GOEL ,PARWANOO vs. DCIT, CC-II, CHANDIGARH

In the result, both the above appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 1174/CHANDI/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh12 Mar 2021AY 2015-16
For Appellant: S/Shri Ashwani Kumar, CAFor Respondent: Smt.C.Chandrakanta, CIT DR
Section 132(1)Section 132(4)Section 153ASection 153A(1)(b)Section 24Section 245D(4)Section 250(6)Section 68Section 80CSection 80T

section 80C of the Act, of the ITA Nos.1174 & 1175/Chd/2019 A.Ys. 2015-16 & 2016-17 Page 14 of 18 interest paid on housing loan & repayment of housing loan, for the reason that the interest certificate mentions the loan sanctioned to the husband of the assessee. 23. Undisputed is the fact that the residential property

SH. GURDEEP SINGH,SIRMOUR vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CHANDIGARH-1

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 453/CHANDI/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh23 Nov 2022AY 2017-18

Bench: The Appeal Is Finally Disposed Off.

For Appellant: Shri Nikhil Goyal, Advocate &For Respondent: Shri Vivek Nangia, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 263

property and it was held that it is a matter of opinion and hence, no question of law arose. The extract reproduced in page 11 para 9 of the impugned order, it was submitted, is an extract of the obiter wherein the Hon'ble Court made observations in passing. The said decision, it was argued in no way lends