Search: disallowance

59 results for “disallowance”+ Section 46Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Addition to Income36 Disallowance18 Section 40A(3)16 Deduction13 Section 142(1)12 Section 14712 Section 14A12 Section 143(3)11 Section 143(2)10

SH. JASDEV SINGH,CHANDIGARH vs. ITO-WARD-5(5), CHANDIGARH

In the result, both the appeals of the assessees are allowed

ITA 214/CHANDI/2021[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh13 Dec 2021AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri N.K. Saini & Shri Sudhanshu Srivastavaआयकर अपील सं./ Ita No. 214/Chd/2021 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2018-19 Sh. Jasdev Singh, The Ito, बनाम 234, Sector 46A Ward 5(5), Chandigarh 160046 Chandigarh

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Jain, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Priyanka Dhar, Sr.DR

Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 36(1)(va)

46A Ward 5(5), Chandigarh 160046 Chandigarh "थायी लेखा सं./PAN NO: AAHDPS4550P अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent Hearing though video Conferencing "नधा"रती क ओर से/Assessee by : Shri Ajay Jain, CA राज"व क ओर से/ Revenue by : Smt. Priyanka Dhar, Sr.DR सुनवाई क तार%ख/Date of Hearing : 13.12.2021 उदघोषणा क तार%ख/Date of Pronouncement

Showing 1–20 of 59 · Page 1 of 3

SH. JASDEV SINGH,CHANDIGARH vs. ITO-WARD-5(5), CHANDIGARH

SH. JASDEV SINGH,CHANDIGARH vs. ITO-WARD-5(5), CHANDIGARH

KHANNA INFRABUILD PRIVATE LIMITED 2000-1A, SUKHDEV NAGAR FEROZEPUR ROAD, LUDHIANA,LUDHIANA vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-2 LUDHIANA, LUDHIANA

KHANNA INFRABUILD PRIVATE LIMITED ,LUDHIANA vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL CIRCLE)-2, LUDHIANA, LUDHIANA

KHANNA INFRABUILD PRIVATE LIMITED ,LUDHIANA vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL CIRCLE)-2 LUDHIANA, LUDHIANA

SH. ANSHUL GOYAL,LUDHIANA vs. ACIT, C-VII, LUDHIANA

M/S ANSHUL GOYAL LAND & HOUSING LTD.,LUDHIANA vs. DCIT, C-VII, LUDHIANA

SH. AMAN SETH,LUDHIANA vs. ITO, W-1(1), LUDHIANA

THE HARYANA STATE CO-OPERATIVE AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT,PANCHKULA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE, PANCHKULA

THE HARYANA STATE CO-OPERATIVE AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT,PANCHKULA vs. DCIT, CIRCLE, PANCHKULA, PANCHKULA

THE HARYANA STATE CO-OPERATIVE AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT,PANCHKULA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE, PANCHKULA

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, PANCHKULA CIRCLE, PANCHKULA, PANCHKULA vs. THE HARYANA STATE CO-OPERATIVE AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT, PANCHKULA

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, PANCHKULA CIRCLE, PANCHKULA, PANCHKULA vs. THE HARYANA STATE CO-OPERATIVE AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT, PANCHKULA

THE HARYANA STATE CO-OPERATIVE AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT,PANCHKULA vs. DCIT,CIRCLE, PANCHKULA, PANCHKULA

THE HARYANA STATE CO-OPERATIVE AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT,PANCHKULA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE,, PANCHKULA

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, PANCHKULA CIRCLE, PANCHKULA, PANCHKULA vs. THE HARYANA STATE CO-OPERATIVE AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT, PANCHKULA

PAWAN KUMAR SINGLA,PANCHKULA vs. DCIT, CC-I, CHANDIGARH

BANGA HOSPITALS PRIVATE LIMITED,MANDI vs. ITO, MANDI

SURINDER KUMAR,LUDHIANA vs. DCIT, LUDHIANA

INCOME TAX OFFICER, LUDHIANA vs. SH SURENDER KUMAR PROP, LUDHIANA

BANUR BROTHER ,PATIALA vs. ITO-WARD-1, AMBALA