BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “disallowance”+ Section 43Dclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai133Chennai74Delhi63Bangalore43Hyderabad38Kolkata24Pune22Ahmedabad14Chandigarh6SC6Cochin5Rajkot5Karnataka4Telangana4Surat3Jabalpur3Himachal Pradesh2Jaipur2Dehradun2Patna2Nagpur2Punjab & Haryana1Kerala1Calcutta1Amritsar1Visakhapatnam1

Key Topics

Section 43D10Section 80I8Section 14A8Section 2636Deduction5Section 92C4Section 2534Section 2504Section 1474Addition to Income

ITO, WARD, PALAMPUR vs. THE KANGRA CENTRAL COOPERATIVE BANK LIMITED, KANGRA

In the result, appeal of the Department is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 583/CHANDI/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh31 May 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Us Is Filed Under Section 253 Of The Income Tax Act, As Amended From Time To Time. The Respondent Is A Cooperative Bank.

For Appellant: Shri Ashwani Kumar, C.A and Ms. Deepali Aggarwal, C.AFor Respondent: Smt. Kusum Bansal, CIT, DR
Section 14ASection 250Section 253

disallowance of expenditure under section 14A of the Act. So the addition made shall be deleted. 2. The another additions made is on the account of income on NPA as per section 43D

PUNJAB STATE COOP. BANK LTD.,CHANDIGARH vs. ACIT, CL-2(1), CHANDIGARH

3
Disallowance3
Transfer Pricing2

In the result the impugned order of Ld

ITA 293/CHANDI/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh21 Aug 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: SHRI. VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member), SHRI. PARESH M. JOSHI (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Atul Goyal, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Dharam Vir, JCIT, Sr. DR
Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 250Section 253Section 80P(2)(a)

Section 43D of the Income Tax Act 1961. The same uniform accounting principle is followed by the banks in India for accounting of amount received under OTS. Sir, the assessing officer has disallowed

ITO, WARD, PALAMPUR vs. THE KANGRA CENTRAL COOPERATIVE BANK LIMITED, KANGRA

In the result, the present appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 32/CHANDI/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh31 May 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: SHRI. VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member), SHRI. PARESH M. JOSHI (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Ashwani Kumar, CA and Ms. Deepali Aggarwal, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Kusum Bansal, CIT, DR
Section 143(1)Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 253Section 36(1)(viia)Section 43Section 43D

section 43D of the Income Tax Act' 1961. The addition be deleted. The Ld. Dy Commissioner of Income Tax has gravely erred, and without 2. appreciating the facts and circumstances of the case, in making the disallowance

ITO, WARD, PALAMPUR vs. THE KANGRA CENTRAL COOPERATIVE BANK LIMITED, KANGRA

In the result, the present appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 31/CHANDI/2023[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh31 May 2024AY 2008-09

Bench: SHRI. VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member), SHRI. PARESH M. JOSHI (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Ashwani Kumar, CA and Ms. Deepali Aggarwal, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Kusum Bansal, CIT, DR
Section 143(1)Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 253Section 36(1)(viia)Section 43Section 43D

section 43D of the Income Tax Act' 1961. The addition be deleted. The Ld. Dy Commissioner of Income Tax has gravely erred, and without 2. appreciating the facts and circumstances of the case, in making the disallowance

A.B. SUGARS LIMITED,PUNJAB vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -1, CHANDIGARH, CHANDIGARH

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 299/CHANDI/2024[2018-2019]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh16 Dec 2024AY 2018-2019

Bench: SHRI. VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member), SHRI. PARESH M. JOSHI (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri T.N. Singla, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Rohit Sharma, CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 263Section 80ISection 92C

43D including depreciation under Section 32 of the Act as so laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in case of Plastiblends India limited (supra) wherein it was held that there is no choice with the assessee to claim or not to claim depreciation and the same has to be necessary considered while computing the eligible profits for claim

A.B. SUGARS LIMITED,PUNJAB vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1, CHANDIGARH

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 300/CHANDI/2024[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh16 Dec 2024AY 2017-2018

Bench: SHRI. VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member), SHRI. PARESH M. JOSHI (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri T.N. Singla, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Rohit Sharma, CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 263Section 80ISection 92C

43D including depreciation under Section 32 of the Act as so laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in case of Plastiblends India limited (supra) wherein it was held that there is no choice with the assessee to claim or not to claim depreciation and the same has to be necessary considered while computing the eligible profits for claim