JAMNA DASS NIKKAMAL JAIN SARAF PRIVATE LIMITED, LUDHIANA,LUDHIANA vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE 1, LUDHIANA, LUDHIANA

In the result, the appeal filed by Revenue is dismissed and the appeal filed by the Assessee is allowed

Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)

section 69A, hence, penalty proceedings u/s 271AAC are to be initiated, which are being initiated separately. (Addition: Rs. 36,75,23,049-/) 22. Feeling aggrieved with the finding of the Assessing Officer the Assessee preferred the appeal before the Ld. CIT(A) and the Ld. CIT(A) has granted 22 the relief to the assessee. The finding

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, LUDHIANA, LUDHIANA vs. M/S JAMNA DASS NIKKAMAL JAIN SARAF PVT. LTD., LUDHIANA

In the result, the appeal filed by Revenue is dismissed and the appeal filed by the Assessee is allowed

Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)

section 69A, hence, penalty proceedings u/s 271AAC are to be initiated, which are being initiated separately. (Addition: Rs. 36,75,23,049-/) 22. Feeling aggrieved with the finding of the Assessing Officer the Assessee preferred the appeal before the Ld. CIT(A) and the Ld. CIT(A) has granted 22 the relief to the assessee. The finding

DCIT, C-1 (EXEMPTIONS), CHANDIGARH vs. THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS SOCIETY, LUDHIANA

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

disallowed or not.\n5. The brief facts of the case are that assessee is a Society\nregistered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860 since\nthe year 2005. It was granted registration for the purpose of\nIncome Tax Act under Section 12A by the Commissioner of\nIncome Tax (Exemptions) w.e.f. 04.03.2009. The 1d. AO had\na confusion with regard

DCIT, CIRCLE, YAMUNANAGAR vs. M/S SYMBIOSIS PHARMACEUTICALS PVT. LTD., YAMUNANAGAR

In the result, appeal is dismissed

Bench: The Due Date As Prescribed In Section 139(1) Of The I.T. Act, 1961 Whereas The Assessee Has Filed Its Return Of Income After The Due Date.

4 u/s 80IC was being disallowed and added to the income of the assessee. 5. The ld. CIT(A), by virtue of the impugned order, deleted the disallowance, bringing the Department in appeal before us by way of Ground Nos. 1 to 3. 6. Challenging the impugned order, the ld. DR has contended that on the facts

SCOTT EDIL ADVANCE RESEARCH LABORATORIES AND EDUCATION LIMITED,CHANDIGARH vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, CHANDIGARH

3: Difference in valuation of factory building in Village Dasora, Majra Hiltop,\nNear Venus Remedies, JharmBaddi as per DVO’s report and as books of the appellant.\nIssue 4: Enhancement u/s 251(1) regarding alleged understatement of investment in\nproperty at 28/6, Industrial Area, Phase-2, Chandigarh.\nIssue 5 : Directions by CIT(A) to AO to initiate 147/148 proceedings taking

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-I, CHANDIGARH , CHANDIGARH vs. MS SCOTT EDIL ADVANCE RESEARCH LABORATOTRIES AND EDUCATION LTD., , CHANDIGARH

3: Difference in valuation of factory building in Village Dasora, Majra Hiltop,\nNear Venus Remedies, JharmBaddi as per DVO’s report and as books of the appellant.\nIssue 4: Enhancement u/s 251(1) regarding alleged understatement of investment in\nproperty at 28/6, Industrial Area, Phase-2, Chandigarh.\nIssue 5 : Directions by CIT(A) to AO to initiate 147/148 proceedings taking

SCOTT EDIL PHARMACIA LTD.,CHANDIGARH vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, CHANDIGARH

3: Difference in valuation of factory building in Village Dasora, Majra Hiltop,\nNear Venus Remedies, JharmBaddi as per DVO’s report and as books of the appellant.\n18\nIssue 4: Enhancement u/s 251(1) regarding alleged understatement of investment in\nproperty at 28/6, Industrial Area, Phase-2, Chandigarh.\nIssue 5 : Directions by CIT(A) to AO to initiate 147/148 proceedings

SHRI BALRAM KRISHAN,CHANDIGARH vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, CHANDIGARH, CHANDIGARH

3: Difference in valuation of factory building in Village Dasora, Majra Hiltop,\nNear Venus Remedies, JharmBaddi as per DVO’s report and as books of the appellant.\n\n\n20\nIssue 4: Enhancement u/s 251(1) regarding alleged understatement of investment in\nproperty at 28/6, Industrial Area, Phase-2, Chandigarh.\nIssue 5 : Directions by CIT(A) to AO to initiate

SANJEEV AGGARWAL,CHANDIGARH vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, CHANDIGARH

3: Difference in valuation of factory building in Village Dasora, Majra Hiltop,\nNear Venus Remedies, JharmBaddi as per DVO’s report and as books of the appellant.\n20\nIssue 4: Enhancement u/s 251(1) regarding alleged understatement of investment in\nproperty at 28/6, Industrial Area, Phase-2, Chandigarh.\nIssue 5 : Directions by CIT(A) to AO to initiate 147/148 proceedings

SCOTT EDIL PHARMACIA LTD.,CHANDIGARH vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, CHANDIGARH

3: Difference in valuation of factory building in Village Dasora, Majra Hiltop,\nNear Venus Remedies, JharmBaddi as per DVO’s report and as books of the appellant.\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n20\nIssue 4: Enhancement u/s 251(1) regarding alleged understatement of investment in\nproperty at 28/6, Industrial Area

SCOTT EDIL PHARMACIA LTD.,CHANDIGARH vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, CHANDIGARH

3: Difference in valuation of factory building in Village Dasora, Majra Hiltop,\nNear Venus Remedies, JharmBaddi as per DVO’s report and as books of the appellant.\nIssue 4: Enhancement u/s 251(1) regarding alleged understatement of investment in\nproperty at 28/6, Industrial Area, Phase-2, Chandigarh.\nIssue 5 : Directions by CIT(A) to AO to initiate 147/148 proceedings taking

SHRI BALRAM KRISHAN,CHANDIGARH vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, CHANDIGARH, CHANDIGARH

Section 132 of the Act in Scott Edil Group of cases\non 15.11.2017. Since the facts involved in all these captioned appeals\nare identical and there are common issues, hence the same were heard\ntogether and the same are being disposed of by this common order.\n2. The grounds/issues raised in all the appeals are summarized as\nunder:\nITA

SCOTT EDIL ADVANCE RESEARCH LABORATORIES AND EDUCATION LIMITED,CHANDIGARH vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, CHANDIGARH

3: Difference in valuation of factory building in Village Dasora, Majra Hiltop,\nNear Venus Remedies, JharmBaddi as per DVO’s report and as books of the appellant.\nIssue 4: Enhancement u/s 251(1) regarding alleged understatement of investment in\nproperty at 28/6, Industrial Area, Phase-2, Chandigarh.\nIssue 5 : Directions by CIT(A) to AO to initiate 147/148 proceedings taking

S.P. SINGLA CONSTRUCTION PRIVATE LIMITED,DELHI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CHANDIGARH

In the result, the appeal is allowed

Bench: SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH (Vice President), SHRI KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)

4 and accordingly, assessment proceedings were completed under Section 147 read with Section 143(3) of the Act dated 17.12.2019. Thereby, the AO after verifying the details of bogus Sub Contractor Firms numbering in 39 disallowed

SCOTT EDIL ADVANCE RESEARCH LABORATORIES AND EDUCATION LIMITED,CHANDIGARH vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, CHANDIGARH

3: Difference in valuation of factory building in Village Dasora, Majra Hiltop,\nNear Venus Remedies, JharmBaddi as per DVO’s report and as books of the appellant.\nIssue 4: Enhancement u/s 251(1) regarding alleged understatement of investment in\nproperty at 28/6, Industrial Area, Phase-2, Chandigarh.\nIssue 5 : Directions by CIT(A) to AO to initiate 147/148 proceedings taking

SHRI BALRAM KRISHAN,CHANDIGARH vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, CHANDIGARH, CHANDIGARH

3: Difference in valuation of factory building in Village Dasora, Majra Hiltop,\nNear Venus Remedies, JharmBaddi as per DVO’s report and as books of the appellant.\nIssue 4: Enhancement u/s 251(1) regarding alleged understatement of investment in\nproperty at 28/6, Industrial Area, Phase-2, Chandigarh.\nIssue 5 : Directions by CIT(A) to AO to initiate 147/148 proceedings taking

SHRI BALRAM KRISHAN,CHANDIGARH vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, CHANDIGARH, CHANDIGARH

3: Difference in valuation of factory building in Village Dasora, Majra Hiltop,\nNear Venus Remedies, JharmBaddi as per DVO’s report and as books of the appellant.\nIssue 4: Enhancement u/s 251(1) regarding alleged understatement of investment in\nproperty at 28/6, Industrial Area, Phase-2, Chandigarh.\nIssue 5 : Directions by CIT(A) to AO to initiate 147/148 proceedings taking

SHRI BALRAM KRISHAN,CHANDIGARH vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, CHANDIGARH, CHANDIGARH

3: Difference in valuation of factory building in Village Dasora, Majra Hiltop,\nNear Venus Remedies, JharmBaddi as per DVO’s report and as books of the appellant.\n19\nIssue 4: Enhancement u/s 251(1) regarding alleged understatement of investment in\nproperty at 28/6, Industrial Area, Phase-2, Chandigarh.\nIssue 5 : Directions by CIT(A) to AO to initiate 147/148 proceedings

MAXPORT INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,CHANDIGARH vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1,CHANDIGARH, CHANDIGARH

3: Difference in valuation of factory building in Village Dasora, Majra Hiltop,\nNear Venus Remedies, JharmBaddi as per DVO’s report and as books of the appellant.\n19\nIssue 4: Enhancement u/s 251(1) regarding alleged understatement of investment in\nproperty at 28/6, Industrial Area, Phase-2, Chandigarh.\nIssue 5 : Directions by CIT(A) to AO to initiate 147/148 proceedings