SMT. AARTI SINGAL,CHANDIGARH vs. DCIT, CC-1, CHANDIGARH

section 245D(4) for the A.Y. 2004-05 to 2011-12 in the case of M/s BPSL and gave the following decision relating to income surrendered by the Assessee in the individual capacity: “19.5 It may be mentioned that Shri Sanjay Singhal and Smt. Arti Singhal have in their individual hands made a declaration

SH. SANJAY SINGAL,CHANDIGARH vs. DCIT, CC-1, CHANDIGARH

section 245D(4) for the A.Y. 2004-05 to 2011-12 in the case of M/s BPSL and gave the following decision relating to income surrendered by the Assessee in the individual capacity: “19.5 It may be mentioned that Shri Sanjay Singhal and Smt. Arti Singhal have in their individual hands made a declaration

SH. SANJAY SINGAL,CHANDIGARH vs. DCIT, CC-1, CHANDIGARH

section 245D(4) for the A.Y. 2004-05 to 2011-12 in the case of M/s BPSL and gave the following decision relating to income surrendered by the Assessee in the individual capacity: “19.5 It may be mentioned that Shri Sanjay Singhal and Smt. Arti Singhal have in their individual hands made a declaration

SMT. AARTI SINGAL,CHANDIGARH vs. DCIT, CC-1, CHANDIGARH

section 245D(4) for the A.Y. 2004-05 to 2011-12 in the case of M/s BPSL and gave the following decision relating to income surrendered by the Assessee in the individual capacity: “19.5 It may be mentioned that Shri Sanjay Singhal and Smt. Arti Singhal have in their individual hands made a declaration

SMT. AARTI SINGAL,CHANDIGARH vs. DCIT, CC-1, CHANDIGARH

section 245D(4) for the A.Y. 2004-05 to 2011-12 in the case of M/s BPSL and gave the following decision relating to income surrendered by the Assessee in the individual capacity: “19.5 It may be mentioned that Shri Sanjay Singhal and Smt. Arti Singhal have in their individual hands made a declaration

SH. SANJAY SINGAL,CHANDIGARH vs. DCIT, CC-1, CHANDIGARH

section 245D(4) for the A.Y. 2004-05 to 2011-12 in the case of M/s BPSL and gave the following decision relating to income surrendered by the Assessee in the individual capacity: “19.5 It may be mentioned that Shri Sanjay Singhal and Smt. Arti Singhal have in their individual hands made a declaration

DCIT, CHANDIGARH vs. SH. KULWANT SINGH, MOHALI

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar

section 271(1)(c) of the Act also provides that if a person fails to offer an explanation or explanation offered is found to be false by the Income-tax Authority or he fails to substantiate such explanation, and that fails to prove the such explanation is bonafide, then the amount added or disallowed in computing the total income

DCIT, CHANDIGARH vs. SH. KULWANT SINGH, MOHALI

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar

section 271(1)(c) of the Act also provides that if a person fails to offer an explanation or explanation offered is found to be false by the Income-tax Authority or he fails to substantiate such explanation, and that fails to prove the such explanation is bonafide, then the amount added or disallowed in computing the total income

DCIT, CHANDIGARH vs. SH. PARAMJIT SINGH, MOHALI

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar

section 271(1)(c) of the Act also provides that if a person fails to offer an explanation or explanation offered is found to be false by the Income-tax Authority or he fails to substantiate such explanation, and that fails to prove the such explanation is bonafide, then the amount added or disallowed in computing the total income

DCIT, CHANDIGARH vs. SMT. JASWANT KAUR, MOHALI

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar

section 271(1)(c) of the Act also provides that if a person fails to offer an explanation or explanation offered is found to be false by the Income-tax Authority or he fails to substantiate such explanation, and that fails to prove the such explanation is bonafide, then the amount added or disallowed in computing the total income

DCIT, CHANDIGARH vs. SMT. MANJIT KAUR, CHANDIGARH

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar

section 271(1)(c) of the Act also provides that if a person fails to offer an explanation or explanation offered is found to be false by the Income-tax Authority or he fails to substantiate such explanation, and that fails to prove the such explanation is bonafide, then the amount added or disallowed in computing the total income

DCIT, CHANDIGARH vs. SH. PARAMJIT SINGH, MOHALI

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar

section 271(1)(c) of the Act also provides that if a person fails to offer an explanation or explanation offered is found to be false by the Income-tax Authority or he fails to substantiate such explanation, and that fails to prove the such explanation is bonafide, then the amount added or disallowed in computing the total income

DCIT, CHANDIGARH vs. SMT. JASWANT KAUR, MOHALI

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar

section 271(1)(c) of the Act also provides that if a person fails to offer an explanation or explanation offered is found to be false by the Income-tax Authority or he fails to substantiate such explanation, and that fails to prove the such explanation is bonafide, then the amount added or disallowed in computing the total income

ANJULA GOEL ,PARWANOO vs. DCIT, CC-II, CHANDIGARH

In the result, both the above appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

disallowance of Rs.1,60,000/- on account of deduction u/s. 80C for Rs. 1,50,000/-and Rs.10,000/- u/s.80TTA of the Income Tax Act ,1961. 8. That the appellant craves leave to add, amend or delete any of the grounds of appeal before the same is heard & disposed off.” 6. Ground Nos.2, 3 and 4 raised by the assessee