BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “disallowance”+ Section 194Iclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi108Mumbai106Kolkata76Bangalore28Raipur18Chennai14Jaipur9Ahmedabad6Cochin6Visakhapatnam6Pune5Hyderabad4Karnataka4Chandigarh3Jodhpur2Kerala1Surat1

Key Topics

Section 116Section 136Section 250(6)4Section 13(2)(c)4Disallowance3Addition to Income3Section 13(1)(c)2Section 13(3)2Exemption2

DCIT, C-1 (EXEMPTIONS), CHANDIGARH vs. CT EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY, JALANDHAR

In the result, both the appeals of the Revenue are

ITA 1135/CHANDI/2017[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh04 Oct 2021AY 2014-15
For Appellant: Shri Ashray Sarna,C.AFor Respondent: Smt. Meenakshi Vohra, Addl. CIT
Section 11Section 13Section 13(1)(c)Section 13(2)(c)Section 13(3)Section 250(6)

Section 194I(a) of the Act. 7. On the other hand the ld. counsel for the assessee has submitted that the TDS was duly deducted in respect of payments made by the Society to the sellers. However, in case of Smt. Parminder Kaur, whose Sale Deed was yet to be executed, the TDS was not deducted as the Society

DCIT, C-1 (EXEMPTIONS), CHANDIGARH vs. CT EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY, JALANDHAR

In the result, both the appeals of the Revenue are

ITA 700/CHANDI/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh04 Oct 2021AY 2015-16
For Appellant: Shri Ashray Sarna,C.AFor Respondent: Smt. Meenakshi Vohra, Addl. CIT
Section 11Section 13Section 13(1)(c)Section 13(2)(c)Section 13(3)Section 250(6)

Section 194I(a) of the Act. 7. On the other hand the ld. counsel for the assessee has submitted that the TDS was duly deducted in respect of payments made by the Society to the sellers. However, in case of Smt. Parminder Kaur, whose Sale Deed was yet to be executed, the TDS was not deducted as the Society

KAMLA RETAIL LTD., NOW KNOWN AS M/S ETHOS LTD.,,CHANDIGARH vs. ADDL. CIT, R-I, CHANDIGARH

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly

ITA 1023/CHANDI/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh20 Jan 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Smt.Diva Singh & Shri Vikram Singh Yadavm/S. Kamla Retail Ltd. Additional Cit, Range-1, बनाम Now Known As Ethos Limited, Chadigarh. Sco-88-89, Sector 8-C, Chandigarh. "थायी लेखा सं./Pan No: Aadck2345N

For Appellant: Shri Parikshit Aggarwal, CAFor Respondent: Smt.Priyanka Dhar, Sr.DR
Section 250(6)Section 30Section 40

Section 250(6) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 2. That on law, facts and circumstances of the case, the Worthy CIT(A) has erred in confirming the action of Ld. AO in making disallowance of Rs. 30,45,000/- as prior period expenses without considering the fact the expense was paid at a later date due to pending negotiation