DCIT, C-1 (EXEMPTIONS), CHANDIGARH vs. THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS SOCIETY, LUDHIANA

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

disallowed. These\npayments were termed in contravention to Section 13(2)(c)\nread with Section 13(3) of the Income

ARYANS EDUCATIONAL AND CHARITABLE TRUST REGD, MOHALI,MOHALI vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, EXEMPTIONS, CHANDIGARH

In the result, appeal is allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Krinwant Sahayआयकर अपील सं./ Ita No. 1136/Chd/2024 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2025-26 Aryans Educational & The Cit (Exemptions), Charitable Trust, Regd.Mohali Vs Chandigarh, C/O Shri Tej Mohan Singh, Advocate, # 527, Sector 10-D, Chandigarh. "थायी लेखा सं./Pan No: Aabta7550L अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent Assessee By : Shri Tej Mohan Singh, Advocate Revenue By : Shri Manav Bansal, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing : 07.08.2025 Date Of Pronouncement : 24.09.2025

13(3) of the Act which resulted in disallowance of exemption u/s 11 due to operation of section 13(l)(c) of the 1. T. Act and had also

J. K. EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,JAMMU vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-1, CHANDIGARH

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

Bench: SHRI. AAKASH DEEP JAIN (Vice President), SHRI. VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member)

section 13(l)(c) r.w.s. 13(3) of the IT Act, 1961 and the total addition made was deleted. As such, it is prayed that the addition made and confirmed may be deleted in view of the facts and circumstances and the cases relied upon. 6.8 Without prejudice to the above, it was submitted that in case any disallowance

J.K.EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,JAMMU vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTION), CHANDIGARH

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

Bench: SHRI. AAKASH DEEP JAIN (Vice President), SHRI. VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member)

section 13(l)(c) r.w.s. 13(3) of the IT Act, 1961 and the total addition made was deleted. As such, it is prayed that the addition made and confirmed may be deleted in view of the facts and circumstances and the cases relied upon. 6.8 Without prejudice to the above, it was submitted that in case any disallowance

J.K. EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,JAMMU & KASHMIR vs. DCIT (EXEMPTION)-CIRCLE-1,, CHANDIGARH

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

Bench: SHRI. AAKASH DEEP JAIN (Vice President), SHRI. VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member)

section 13(l)(c) r.w.s. 13(3) of the IT Act, 1961 and the total addition made was deleted. As such, it is prayed that the addition made and confirmed may be deleted in view of the facts and circumstances and the cases relied upon. 6.8 Without prejudice to the above, it was submitted that in case any disallowance

M/S ARYANS EDUCATIONAL AND CHARITABLE TRUST,MOHALI vs. DCIT, C-1, (E), CHANDIGARH

In the result, the appeal of the Assessee is partly allowed

Bench: Shri A.D. Jain & Dr Krinwant Sahayआयकर अपील सं./ Ita No. 823/Chd/2019 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2015-16 M/S Aryans Educational & Vs. The Dcit, बनाम Charitable Trust, Circle-1 (Exemptions), # 2129, Phase-10, Chandigarh Mohali "थायी लेखा सं./Pan No: Aabta7550L अपीलाथ"/ Appellant ""यथ"/ Repsondent

section 13(3) and it will nowhere lead to any conclusion that the assessee would loose its charity status. In other words, if a small amount is to be disallowed

KANDI FRIENDS EDUCATIONAL TRUST,ROPAR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSION OF INCOME TAX, CL. 1, EXEMPTION, CHANDIGARH

In the result, both the appeals are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Krinwant Sahay

disallowed u/s 13(1)(c) read with Section 13(3), then the disallowance is to be restricted qua that amount

KANDI FRIENDS EDUCATIONAL TRUST,ROPAR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CHANDIGARH

In the result, both the appeals are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Krinwant Sahay

disallowed u/s 13(1)(c) read with Section 13(3), then the disallowance is to be restricted qua that amount

K.C. SOCIAL WELFARE TRUST (REGD.),NAWANSHAHR vs. ACIT EXEMPTION, CIRCLE-1, CHANDIGARH, CHANDIGARH

In the result, both the appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Krinwant Sahayआयकर अपील सं./ Ita No. 1100/Chd/2024 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2017-18 K.C. Social Welfare Trust (Regd.), The Acit (Exemption), K.C. Tower, Chandigarh Road, Vs Circle -1, Nawan Shahr. Chandigarh. "थायी लेखा सं./Pan No: Aaatk6129L अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent Assessee By : Shri Rajinder Kumar Chopra, Ca Revenue By : Shri Vivek Vardhan, Addl. Cit, Sr.Dr Date Of Hearing : 05.08.2025 Date Of Pronouncement : 27.08.2025 Hybrid Hearing O R D E R Per Raj Pal Yadav, Vp

Section 11 and 12. The only exception is disallowance of any amount which was unduly extended by the assessee to the persons mentioned in clause 13(3

K.C.SOCIAL WELFARE TRUST (REGD.),NAWANSHAHR vs. DCIT (EXEMPTIONS), CIRCLE-1, CHANDIGARH

In the result, both the appeals are allowed for statistical

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Krinwant Sahay

Section 11 and 12. The only exception is disallowance of any amount which was unduly extended by the assessee to the persons mentioned in clause 13(3

ASSISSTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, EXEMPTION, CHANDIGARH, CHANDIGARH vs. K.C. SOCIAL WELFARE TRUST, K.C. TOWER

In the result, both the appeals are allowed for statistical

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Krinwant Sahay

Section 11 and 12. The only exception is disallowance of any amount which was unduly extended by the assessee to the persons mentioned in clause 13(3

VARDHMAN SPECIAL STEELS LTD.,LUDHIANA vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-1, LUDHIANA

3), and a demand notice was issued.\n\n4.\nAgainst the order of the AO the assessee went in appeal before\nthe Ld. CIT(A) who has since dismissed the appeal of the Assessee.\n5.\nAgainst the order of the Ld. CIT(A) the assessee preferred an\nappeal before the Tribunal.\n6. During the course of hearing the Ld. Counsel

M/S ARYANS EDUCATIONAL AND CHARITABLE TRUST,MOHALI vs. DCIT, C-1, (E), CHANDIGARH

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

Bench: Shri A.D. Jain & Dr Krinwant Sahayआयकर अपील सं./ Ita No. 821/Chd/2019 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2013-14 M/S Aryans Educational & Vs. The Dcit, Circle-1 Charitable Trust, बनाम (Exemptions), # 2129, Phase-10, Chandigarh Mohali "थायी लेखा सं./Pan No: Aabta7550L

disallowing the exemption by invoking the provisions of section 13(1)(c) or section 13(1)(d) of the Income Tax Act. In fact there was no diversion of funds to give any advantage to Sh. Anshu Kataria. Without prejudice to above; even the addition as made by the learned AO is arbitrary and highly exorbitant. The maximum addition that

JAMNA DASS NIKKAMAL JAIN SARAF PRIVATE LIMITED, LUDHIANA,LUDHIANA vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE 1, LUDHIANA, LUDHIANA

In the result, the appeal filed by Revenue is dismissed and the appeal filed by the Assessee is allowed

Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)

13,774 Page no 6 of A1(excess 64,366/- cash) Total 36,75,23,049/- As the addition includes addition made on account of section 69A, hence, penalty proceedings u/s 271AAC are to be initiated, which are being initiated separately. (Addition: Rs. 36,75,23,049-/) 22. Feeling aggrieved with the finding of the Assessing Officer the Assessee preferred

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, LUDHIANA, LUDHIANA vs. M/S JAMNA DASS NIKKAMAL JAIN SARAF PVT. LTD., LUDHIANA

In the result, the appeal filed by Revenue is dismissed and the appeal filed by the Assessee is allowed

Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)

13,774 Page no 6 of A1(excess 64,366/- cash) Total 36,75,23,049/- As the addition includes addition made on account of section 69A, hence, penalty proceedings u/s 271AAC are to be initiated, which are being initiated separately. (Addition: Rs. 36,75,23,049-/) 22. Feeling aggrieved with the finding of the Assessing Officer the Assessee preferred

SMT RAMANANDI ANANGPURIA CHARITABLE TRUST,TAGORE PUBLIC SCHOOL, PALWAL vs. DCIT (EXEMPTIONS), CIRCLE 2, CHANDIGARH

In the result, appeal of the Assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), SHRI. MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL (Accountant Member)

Disallowance of Interest 14.1 It was the submission of the learned AR that no undue benefit had been passed to the related parties to attract the mischief of section 13(1)(c) read with section 13(3

CT EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,JALANDHAR vs. DCIT, CHANDIGARH

In the result, the appeal filed by the Assessee is Partly Allowed for\nStatistical Purposes as per the directions above

13(3) of the Act.\n3.2 The AO computed the total assessed income at Rs.10,92,96,818/-, making\nthe following key additions:\nΟ\nSurplus taxed as AOP (Denial of Exemption): Rs.10,20,01,948/-\nDisallowance of Interest (on advances to specified persons): Rs.\n10,61,466/-\nΟ\nDisallowance of Salary to Specified Persons: Rs.21,02,000/- (Deletion\nupheld

DCIT, C-1, (E), CHANDIGARH vs. M/S ARYANS EDUCATIONAL AND CHARITABLE TRUST, MOHALI

In the result, Revenue’s appeal is dismissed

Bench: Shri A.D. Jain & Dr Krinwant Sahayआयकर अपील सं./ Ita No. 880/Chd/2019 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2014-15 The Dcit, Vs. M/S Aryans Educational & बनाम Circle-1 (Exemptions), Charitable Trust, Chandigarh # 2129, Phase-X, Mohali "थायी लेखा सं./Pan No: Aabta7550L अपीलाथ"/ Appellant ""यथ"/ Repsondent

disallowance of donation of Rs. 1,50,000/- made by AO, is deleted. Ground of appeal no. 3 is allowed.” 12. We have considered the findings of the Assessing Officer in the assessment order, the arguments put forward by ld. DR and the submissions filed by the Counsel of the Assessee. We find that the ratio decided

WINSOME TEXTILE INDUSTRIES LIMITED,CHANDIGARH vs. ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-4(1), CHANDIGARH, CHANDIGARH

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed and the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: SHRI. VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member), SHRI. PARESH M. JOSHI (Judicial Member)

Section 147 is attracted. The reasons to believe ought to also paraphrase any investigation report which may form the basis of the reasons and any enquiry conducted by the AO on the same and if so, the conclusions thereof; (iii) where the reasons make a reference to another document, whether as a letter or report, such document and/ or relevant