J. K. EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,JAMMU vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-1, CHANDIGARH

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

Bench: SHRI. AAKASH DEEP JAIN (Vice President), SHRI. VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member)

section 13(l)(c) r.w.s. 13(3) of the IT Act, 1961 and the total addition made was deleted. As such, it is prayed that the addition made and confirmed may be deleted in view of the facts and circumstances and the cases relied upon. 6.8 Without prejudice to the above, it was submitted that in case any disallowance

J.K. EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,JAMMU & KASHMIR vs. DCIT (EXEMPTION)-CIRCLE-1,, CHANDIGARH

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

Bench: SHRI. AAKASH DEEP JAIN (Vice President), SHRI. VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member)

section 13(l)(c) r.w.s. 13(3) of the IT Act, 1961 and the total addition made was deleted. As such, it is prayed that the addition made and confirmed may be deleted in view of the facts and circumstances and the cases relied upon. 6.8 Without prejudice to the above, it was submitted that in case any disallowance

J.K.EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,JAMMU vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTION), CHANDIGARH

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

Bench: SHRI. AAKASH DEEP JAIN (Vice President), SHRI. VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member)

section 13(l)(c) r.w.s. 13(3) of the IT Act, 1961 and the total addition made was deleted. As such, it is prayed that the addition made and confirmed may be deleted in view of the facts and circumstances and the cases relied upon. 6.8 Without prejudice to the above, it was submitted that in case any disallowance

VARDHMAN SPECIAL STEELS LTD.,LUDHIANA vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-1, LUDHIANA

13)......During assessment proceedings, the assesse\nhad explained the basis for making the impugned disallowance\nsubmitting a calculation of the same also. The assesse had explained\nthat it had made certain investments directly while others had been\nmade through Portfolio Mangement Services. In relation to those\ninvestments which had been made directly, it had disallowed expenses\nof Rs.50,000/- while

M/S ARYANS EDUCATIONAL AND CHARITABLE TRUST,MOHALI vs. DCIT, C-1, (E), CHANDIGARH

In the result, the appeal of the Assessee is partly allowed

Bench: Shri A.D. Jain & Dr Krinwant Sahayआयकर अपील सं./ Ita No. 823/Chd/2019 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2015-16 M/S Aryans Educational & Vs. The Dcit, बनाम Charitable Trust, Circle-1 (Exemptions), # 2129, Phase-10, Chandigarh Mohali "थायी लेखा सं./Pan No: Aabta7550L अपीलाथ"/ Appellant ""यथ"/ Repsondent

disallowing the exemption by invoking the provisions of section 13(l)(c) or section 13(l)(d) of the Income

KANDI FRIENDS EDUCATIONAL TRUST,ROPAR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSION OF INCOME TAX, CL. 1, EXEMPTION, CHANDIGARH

In the result, both the appeals are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Krinwant Sahay

disallowed u/s 13(1)(c) read with Section 13(3), then the disallowance is to be restricted qua that amount

KANDI FRIENDS EDUCATIONAL TRUST,ROPAR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CHANDIGARH

In the result, both the appeals are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Krinwant Sahay

disallowed u/s 13(1)(c) read with Section 13(3), then the disallowance is to be restricted qua that amount

K.C. SOCIAL WELFARE TRUST (REGD.),NAWANSHAHR vs. ACIT EXEMPTION, CIRCLE-1, CHANDIGARH, CHANDIGARH

In the result, both the appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Krinwant Sahayआयकर अपील सं./ Ita No. 1100/Chd/2024 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2017-18 K.C. Social Welfare Trust (Regd.), The Acit (Exemption), K.C. Tower, Chandigarh Road, Vs Circle -1, Nawan Shahr. Chandigarh. "थायी लेखा सं./Pan No: Aaatk6129L अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent Assessee By : Shri Rajinder Kumar Chopra, Ca Revenue By : Shri Vivek Vardhan, Addl. Cit, Sr.Dr Date Of Hearing : 05.08.2025 Date Of Pronouncement : 27.08.2025 Hybrid Hearing O R D E R Per Raj Pal Yadav, Vp

Section 11 and 12. The only exception is disallowance of any amount which was unduly extended by the assessee to the persons mentioned in clause 13

DCIT, C-1, (E), CHANDIGARH vs. M/S ARYANS EDUCATIONAL AND CHARITABLE TRUST, MOHALI

In the result, Revenue’s appeal is dismissed

Bench: Shri A.D. Jain & Dr Krinwant Sahayआयकर अपील सं./ Ita No. 880/Chd/2019 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2014-15 The Dcit, Vs. M/S Aryans Educational & बनाम Circle-1 (Exemptions), Charitable Trust, Chandigarh # 2129, Phase-X, Mohali "थायी लेखा सं./Pan No: Aabta7550L अपीलाथ"/ Appellant ""यथ"/ Repsondent

disallowing the exemption by invoking the provisions of section 13(l)(c) or section 13(l)(d) of the Income

ASSISSTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, EXEMPTION, CHANDIGARH, CHANDIGARH vs. K.C. SOCIAL WELFARE TRUST, K.C. TOWER

In the result, both the appeals are allowed for statistical

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Krinwant Sahay

Section 11 and 12. The only exception is disallowance of any amount which was unduly extended by the assessee to the persons mentioned in clause 13

K.C.SOCIAL WELFARE TRUST (REGD.),NAWANSHAHR vs. DCIT (EXEMPTIONS), CIRCLE-1, CHANDIGARH

In the result, both the appeals are allowed for statistical

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Krinwant Sahay

Section 11 and 12. The only exception is disallowance of any amount which was unduly extended by the assessee to the persons mentioned in clause 13

M/S ARYANS EDUCATIONAL AND CHARITABLE TRUST,MOHALI vs. DCIT, C-1, (E), CHANDIGARH

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

Bench: Shri A.D. Jain & Dr Krinwant Sahayआयकर अपील सं./ Ita No. 821/Chd/2019 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2013-14 M/S Aryans Educational & Vs. The Dcit, Circle-1 Charitable Trust, बनाम (Exemptions), # 2129, Phase-10, Chandigarh Mohali "थायी लेखा सं./Pan No: Aabta7550L

disallowing the exemption by invoking the provisions of section 13(1)(c) or section 13(1)(d) of the Income

SMT RAMANANDI ANANGPURIA CHARITABLE TRUST,TAGORE PUBLIC SCHOOL, PALWAL vs. DCIT (EXEMPTIONS), CIRCLE 2, CHANDIGARH

In the result, appeal of the Assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), SHRI. MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL (Accountant Member)

disallowance, the CIT(A) held that the assessee had paid Rs.19,82,813/- to trustees and their relatives, which attracted section 13

DCIT, C-V, LUDHIANA vs. M/S HERO CYCLES LTD., LUDHIANA

In the result, appeal of the Department is dismissed and the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: SHRI. RAJPAL YADAV (Vice President), SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY, AM आयकर अपील सं. / ITA No. 588/Chd/2018 निर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Years : 2012-13 The DCIT C-V, Ludhiana बनाम M/s Hero Cycles Ltd. Hero Nagar, G.T. Road Ludhiana स्थायी लेखा सं./PAN NO: AAACH4073P अपीलार्थी/Appellant प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent आयकर अपील सं. / ITA No. 473/Chd/2018 निर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Years : 2012-13 M/s Hero Cycles Ltd. Hero Nagar, G.T. Road Ludhiana बनाम The ACIT C-V, Ludhiana स्थायी लेखा सं./PAN NO: AAACH4073P

section 14A an be made, we do not find any need to adjudicate these issues. 10. As regards administrative expenses, it is a fact on record that the assessee himself had disallowed an amount of Rs.2,73,13

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1), CHANDIGARH, CHANDIGARH vs. UNIPRO TECHNO INFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD, CHANDIGARH

In the result, the order of the ld CIT(A) is confirmed and the grounds of appeal taken by the Revenue are dismissed

Bench: SHRI. VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member), SHRI. PARESH M. JOSHI (Judicial Member)

13) of section 80IA of the Act. The learned Pr. CIT has held that as per the aforesaid explanation to the section work contracts are not eligible for deduction under section 80IA(4) and apparently the project undertaken by the assessee is covered under the definition of "works contract". Moreover the Assessing Officer has not examined this aspect during

ITO, WARD, PALAMPUR vs. THE KANGRA CENTRAL COOPERATIVE BANK LIMITED, KANGRA

In the result, appeal of the Department is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Us Is Filed Under Section 253 Of The Income Tax Act, As Amended From Time To Time. The Respondent Is A Cooperative Bank.

13 of the Balance sheet which was attached with this reply filed to the AO. So the addition made shall be deleted. 5. The Ld. CIT(A) in respect of above ground No. 1 wherein the Respondent has contested the disallowance of Rs. 44,08,23,002/- being the amount of expenditure incurred in relation to exempt income, under section

M/S BARNALA BUILDERS AND CONSULTANT,ZIRAKPUR vs. DCIT/ACIT (CEN)-1, CHANDIGARH

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

Bench: SHRI. VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member), SHRI. PARESH M. JOSHI (Judicial Member)

13. The ld. AR referred to section 5 of the Payment of Wages Act, 1936, to contend that deduction made from an employee’s salary for the month of October should suffer disallowance

M/S HERO CYCLES LTD.,LUDHIANA vs. ACIT, C-V, LUDHIANA

In the result, appeal of the Department is dismissed and the\nappeal of the assessee is allowed

section 14A an be made, we do not find any\nneed to adjudicate these issues.\n10. As regards administrative expenses, it is a fact on record that\nthe assessee himself had disallowed an amount of Rs.2,73,13