SANT KIRPAL VIDYAK MISSION,LUDHIANA vs. ITO (EXEMPTION), CHANDIGARH

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

disallowed because it had filed delayed ITR and further\ndelayed audit report in form no. 108 without any reasonable cause for the same in\nviolation of section 12A

ARYA COLLEGE,LUDHIANA, PUNJAB vs. DCIT, EXEMPTIONS CIRCLE 1, CHANDIGARH, CHANDIGARH

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for\nstatistical purposes

disallowances to returned income.\n5.4 It may therefore be stated that the power of the appellate authority\nin respect of appeals against Intimation u/s 143(1) is limited to examine and\nverify whether the assessing officer has followed the provisions as mentioned\nin various sub clauses of clause (a) and clauses (b) to (e) of section 143(1)\nwhile making

EMSON TOOLS MFG. CORPN. LTD.,LUDHIANA vs. ACIT/DCIT- 1, LUDHIANA

In the result, both the appeals of the assessees are allowed

12A of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 and provisos (b) and (c) of Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and any other laws, which prescribe period(s) of limitation for instituting proceedings, outer limits (within which the court or tribunal can condone delay) and termination of proceedings. In view of the aforesaid directions of the Hon'ble Apex

SH. RAJIV KUMAR,MOHALI vs. ITO , WARD -1,, SANGRUR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessees are allowed

12A of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 and provisos (b) and (c) of Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and any other laws, which prescribe period(s) o f limitation for instituting proceedings, outer limits (within which the court or tribunal can condone delay) and termination o f proceedings. Copy of judgment is attached herewith as per Annexure

JCIT(OSD), C-1, (E), CHANDIGARH vs. THE SIKH EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY, PATIALA

Bench: The Ld. Cit(A) Against Assessment Order Dt. 30/03/2013 Which Was Passed By Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax, Patiala Range, Patiala, Punjab Which Order Is Hereinafter Referred To As “Ao’S Order”.

disallowed. Keeping in view, the above facts, the income of the Society for the purpose of section 11 is computed as under :- Particulars Income 1. Gross receipts 113416023 2. Expenditure- Total expenditure 43285738 70130285 75474465/- Rs. 3,21,88,727/- (Depreciation claimed on building under construction

THE SIKH EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,PATIALA vs. ADDL. CIT, RANGE, PATIALA

Bench: The Ld. Cit(A) Against Assessment Order Dt. 30/03/2013 Which Was Passed By Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax, Patiala Range, Patiala, Punjab Which Order Is Hereinafter Referred To As “Ao’S Order”.

disallowed. Keeping in view, the above facts, the income of the Society for the purpose of section 11 is computed as under :- Particulars Income 1. Gross receipts 113416023 2. Expenditure- Total expenditure 43285738 70130285 75474465/- Rs. 3,21,88,727/- (Depreciation claimed on building under construction

SHRI GURU NANAK NAM LEWA SEWAK JATHA,,FATEHGARH SAHIB vs. ITO, EXEMPTION WARD, CHANDIGARH

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: SHRI. VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member)

12A of the Act. The assessee’s case was selected for scrutiny and notice under section 143(2) was issued on 27/08/2018 and the assessment order was passed under section 143(3) on 27/11/2019 wherein the AO disallowed

M/S ASHA TECHNOLOGIES,KALA AMB vs. ITO, SIRMOUR

In the result, both the above appeals of the Assessee are partly allowed as aforesaid in respect of impugned orders dt

Bench: SHRI. VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member), SHRI. PARESH M. JOSHI (Judicial Member)

12A) of the Income Tax Act 1961. 15. That on 7th & 8th December 2009, survey u/s 133A of the Income Tax Act 1961 was carried out in the business-cum-office premises of M/s. Asha Technologies, Vill: Johron, Trilokpur Road, Kala Amb (H.P.). During the course of survey operation, a day book pertaining to Asst. Year 2007-08 was found

M/S ASHA TECHNOLOGIES,SIRMOUR vs. ADDL. CIT, SOLAN

In the result, both the above appeals of the Assessee are partly allowed as aforesaid in respect of impugned orders dt

Bench: SHRI. VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member), SHRI. PARESH M. JOSHI (Judicial Member)

12A) of the Income Tax Act 1961. 15. That on 7th & 8th December 2009, survey u/s 133A of the Income Tax Act 1961 was carried out in the business-cum-office premises of M/s. Asha Technologies, Vill: Johron, Trilokpur Road, Kala Amb (H.P.). During the course of survey operation, a day book pertaining to Asst. Year 2007-08 was found

DCIT, C-1 (EXEMPTIONS), CHANDIGARH vs. THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS SOCIETY, LUDHIANA

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

disallowed or not.\n5. The brief facts of the case are that assessee is a Society\nregistered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860 since\nthe year 2005. It was granted registration for the purpose of\nIncome Tax Act under Section 12A

ARYANS EDUCATIONAL AND CHARITABLE TRUST REGD, MOHALI,MOHALI vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, EXEMPTIONS, CHANDIGARH

In the result, appeal is allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Krinwant Sahayआयकर अपील सं./ Ita No. 1136/Chd/2024 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2025-26 Aryans Educational & The Cit (Exemptions), Charitable Trust, Regd.Mohali Vs Chandigarh, C/O Shri Tej Mohan Singh, Advocate, # 527, Sector 10-D, Chandigarh. "थायी लेखा सं./Pan No: Aabta7550L अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent Assessee By : Shri Tej Mohan Singh, Advocate Revenue By : Shri Manav Bansal, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing : 07.08.2025 Date Of Pronouncement : 24.09.2025

12A r.w.s 12AB of the Act. In the above incomplete statement of facts and position extracted verbatim in the notice from the order of assessment, reference has been made to the disallowance of exemption u/s 11 and 12 -an assessment related matter - on account of the application of Sections

ITO, WARD (E), CHANDIGARH vs. SANT BABA SUNDER SINGH, BARNALA

In the result the appeal of the revenue is dismissed said order was pronounced in the open court at the time of hearing itself

Bench: Ms. Diva Singhassessment Year: 2008-09

section 10(23C) are separately applicable to each institute and the receipt of the different institute of the same assessee cannot be claimed while arriving at the figure of annual receipt of the institute. iii. That on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Ld. CIT(A) has erred in law in not following the judgment

DCIT, C-1 (E), CHANDIGARH vs. M/S IMPROVEMENT TRUST, PATIALA

In the result, appeals filed by the revenue for the Assessment years 2013-14 and 2015-16 are dismissed and appeal pertaining to the Assessment year 2014-15 is partly allowed for statistical purposes

disallowance of donation expenditure of Rs. 4 crore, these appeals were clubbed, heard together and are being disposed of by this common order for the sake of convenience. ITA No. 468/Chd/2018 AY 2013-14 3. Brief facts of the lead case pertaining to the Assessment year 2013-14 are that the assessee society registered under section 12A

DCIT, (E), C-1, CHANDIGARH vs. THE PATIALA IMPROVEMENT TRUST, PATIALA

In the result, appeals filed by the revenue for the Assessment years 2013-14 and 2015-16 are dismissed and appeal pertaining to the Assessment year 2014-15 is partly allowed for statistical purposes

disallowance of donation expenditure of Rs. 4 crore, these appeals were clubbed, heard together and are being disposed of by this common order for the sake of convenience. ITA No. 468/Chd/2018 AY 2013-14 3. Brief facts of the lead case pertaining to the Assessment year 2013-14 are that the assessee society registered under section 12A

JCIT (OSD), (EXEMPTIONS), C-1, CHANDIGARH vs. PATIALA IMPROVEMENT TRUST, PATIALA

In the result, appeals filed by the revenue for the Assessment years 2013-14 and 2015-16 are dismissed and appeal pertaining to the Assessment year 2014-15 is partly allowed for statistical purposes

disallowance of donation expenditure of Rs. 4 crore, these appeals were clubbed, heard together and are being disposed of by this common order for the sake of convenience. ITA No. 468/Chd/2018 AY 2013-14 3. Brief facts of the lead case pertaining to the Assessment year 2013-14 are that the assessee society registered under section 12A

KANDI FRIENDS EDUCATIONAL TRUST,ROPAR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CHANDIGARH

In the result, both the appeals are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Krinwant Sahay

disallowed the benefit of Section 11 in toto. 9. We have duly considered the rival contentions and gone through the record carefully. As observed earlier, assessee enjoys registration u/s 12A

KANDI FRIENDS EDUCATIONAL TRUST,ROPAR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSION OF INCOME TAX, CL. 1, EXEMPTION, CHANDIGARH

In the result, both the appeals are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Krinwant Sahay

disallowed the benefit of Section 11 in toto. 9. We have duly considered the rival contentions and gone through the record carefully. As observed earlier, assessee enjoys registration u/s 12A

DCIT, C-1 (EXPEMTION), CHANDIGARH vs. M/S IMPROVEMENT TRUST HOSHIARPUR, HOSHIARPUR

The appeals of the Revenue are hereby dismissed

Bench: Smt. Diva Singh & Dr. B.R.R. Kumarassessment Year: 2014-15

disallowance of exemption. 74. It cannot possibly be suggested that the Government of Punjab formed the trusts under the Punjab Town Improvement Act, 1922 because it wanted to carry on the business as colonizers or developers under the mask of the category "objects of general public utility". 75. Section 28(2)(iii) of the Punjab Town Improvement Act, 1922 permits

DCIT, C-1 (EXEMPTION), CHANDIGARH vs. M/S IMPROVEMENT TRUST KARTARPUR, KARTARPUR

The appeals of the Revenue are hereby dismissed

Bench: Smt. Diva Singh & Dr. B.R.R. Kumarassessment Year: 2014-15

disallowance of exemption. 74. It cannot possibly be suggested that the Government of Punjab formed the trusts under the Punjab Town Improvement Act, 1922 because it wanted to carry on the business as colonizers or developers under the mask of the category "objects of general public utility". 75. Section 28(2)(iii) of the Punjab Town Improvement Act, 1922 permits