M/S APEX BUILDERS, LUDHIANA vs. ITO, W-2(1), LUDHIANA
The appeal is partly allowed
ITA 1284/CHANDI/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh28 May 2025AY 2012-13
Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member)
For Appellant: Shri Vinamar Gupta, CA (Virtual Mode)For Respondent: Shri Vivek Vardhan, Addl. CIT, Sr. DR
Section 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 194ASection 271(1)(c)Section 36(1)(iii)Section 40Section 40A(3)
section 40A(3) of the Act. The total amount of such purchases aggregated to Rs . 16,33,037/-.
No satisfactory explanation for seeking the deduction and falling under the exception mentioned in Rule 6DD was provided by the assessee. Therefore, the Assessing Officer had disallowed the entire amount of Rs. 16,33,037/-.
4.3 Additionally, the AO observed another