BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

13 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 80G(5)(iii)clear

Sorted by relevance

Pune178Mumbai155Chennai151Ahmedabad143Kolkata87Jaipur80Delhi48Bangalore44Surat30Hyderabad28Lucknow16Nagpur15Rajkot13Chandigarh13Indore9Agra6Jabalpur6Amritsar5Panaji4Jodhpur3Cochin3Visakhapatnam2Cuttack2Guwahati1SC1Allahabad1

Key Topics

Section 12A53Section 80G21Section 12A(1)(ac)17Exemption13Natural Justice9Section 80G(5)8Limitation/Time-bar8Section 2507Condonation of Delay

JONANG BUDDHIST EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,KANGRA, HIMACHAL PRADESH vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, EXEMPTIONS, CHANDIGARH , CHANDIGARH

In the result, Assessee’s appeal is dismissed

ITA 1350/CHANDI/2025[2025-26]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh07 Jan 2026AY 2025-26

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Laliet Kumar, Jm & Hon’Ble Shri Krinwant Sahay, Am आयकर अपील सं./ Ita No.1350/Chd/2025 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2025-26) Jonang Buddhist Educational Commissioner Of Society Income बनाम/ C/O Tejmohan Singh, Advocate Tax Exemptions, Vs. #527, Sector 10-D, Chandigarh Chandigarh 160011 "ायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Aafaj-8024-M (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ" / Respondent) : अपीलाथ"कीओरसे/ : Sh. Tej Mohan Singh (Advocate) Appellant By ""थ"कीओरसे/Respondent : Sh. Manav Bansal (Cit) Dr By सुनवाईकीतारीख/Date Of Hearing : 16-12-2025 घोषणाकीतारीख /Date Of : 07- 01-2026 Pronouncement आदेश / O R D E R Krinwant Sahay () Appeal In This Case Has Been Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Dated 03.09.2025 Passed By The Ld.

For Respondent: Sh. Manav Bansal (CIT) DR by
Section 10ASection 12ASection 80GSection 80G(5)(iii)

iii) of first proviso to sub-section (5) of section 80G of the Act and also the applicant has not filed its application within the extended time limit provided by CBDT as discussed in Para 6 above.” 8. Per contra, the Ld. CIT DR filed certain case laws in the case of ‘State of U.P. v. Harish Chandra

7
Section 2533
Section 53
Section 80G(5)(i)2

IDREAM SOCIAL EDTECH FOUNDATION,PANCHKULA vs. CIT(E), CHANDIGARH

In the result, both appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 809/CHANDI/2023[2024-25]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh02 Apr 2024AY 2024-25

Bench: SHRI A.D.JAIN (Vice President), SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Amit Parsad Advocate &For Respondent: Shri Rohit Sharma, CIT-DR
Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 282

5) of section 80G of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by the in law inasmuch as the application of final approval/registration for the assessment years 2021-22 to ITA 808 & 809/CHD/2023 A.Y.2021-22 & 2024-25 8 2023-24 [in terms of Section 12A(1)(ac)(iii)] under Section 12AB of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was not heard on merits, rejection

IDREAM SOCIAL EDTECH FOUNDATION,PANCHKULA vs. CIT(E), CHANDIGARH

In the result, both appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 808/CHANDI/2023[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh02 Apr 2024AY 2021-22

Bench: SHRI A.D.JAIN (Vice President), SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Amit Parsad Advocate &For Respondent: Shri Rohit Sharma, CIT-DR
Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 282

5) of section 80G of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by the in law inasmuch as the application of final approval/registration for the assessment years 2021-22 to ITA 808 & 809/CHD/2023 A.Y.2021-22 & 2024-25 8 2023-24 [in terms of Section 12A(1)(ac)(iii)] under Section 12AB of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was not heard on merits, rejection

KDDL ETHOS FOUNDATION,CHANDIGARH vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, EXEMPTIONS, CHANDIGARH

In the result, all the captioned appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 7/CHANDI/2025[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh08 Jul 2025AY 2022-23

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Krinwant Sahayआयकर अपील सं./ Ita Nos. 7 To 10/Chd/2025 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2022-23 [ U/S 12Aa & 80G ] Kddl Ethos Foundation, The Cit C/O Tej Mohan Singh, बनाम (Exemptions), Advocate, Chandigarh Vs. 527, Sector 10-D, Chandigarh "थायी लेखा सं./ Pan No: Aactk7915Q अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

For Appellant: Sh. Tej Mohan Singh, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Meenakshi Vohra, CIT DR
Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 80GSection 80G(5)

iii) and two are for Registration u/s 80G(5) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short 'the Act'). 3. The Registry has marked two appeals i.e., in ITA Nos. 9 and 10/Chd/2025, time barred by 643 days. During proceeding before us, the ld. Counsel for the Assessee has brought it on record that the Applications for condonation of delay

KDDL ETHOS FOUNDATION,CHANDIGARH vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, EXEMPTIONS,, CHANDIGARH

In the result, all the captioned appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 10/CHANDI/2025[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh08 Jul 2025AY 2022-23

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Krinwant Sahayआयकर अपील सं./ Ita Nos. 7 To 10/Chd/2025 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2022-23 [ U/S 12Aa & 80G ] Kddl Ethos Foundation, The Cit C/O Tej Mohan Singh, बनाम (Exemptions), Advocate, Chandigarh Vs. 527, Sector 10-D, Chandigarh "थायी लेखा सं./ Pan No: Aactk7915Q अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

For Appellant: Sh. Tej Mohan Singh, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Meenakshi Vohra, CIT DR
Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 80GSection 80G(5)

iii) and two are for Registration u/s 80G(5) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short 'the Act'). 3. The Registry has marked two appeals i.e., in ITA Nos. 9 and 10/Chd/2025, time barred by 643 days. During proceeding before us, the ld. Counsel for the Assessee has brought it on record that the Applications for condonation of delay

KDDL ETHOS FOUNDATION,CHANDIGARH vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, EXEMPTIONS , CHANDIGARH

In the result, all the captioned appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 8/CHANDI/2025[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh08 Jul 2025AY 2022-23

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Krinwant Sahayआयकर अपील सं./ Ita Nos. 7 To 10/Chd/2025 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2022-23 [ U/S 12Aa & 80G ] Kddl Ethos Foundation, The Cit C/O Tej Mohan Singh, बनाम (Exemptions), Advocate, Chandigarh Vs. 527, Sector 10-D, Chandigarh "थायी लेखा सं./ Pan No: Aactk7915Q अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

For Appellant: Sh. Tej Mohan Singh, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Meenakshi Vohra, CIT DR
Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 80GSection 80G(5)

iii) and two are for Registration u/s 80G(5) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short 'the Act'). 3. The Registry has marked two appeals i.e., in ITA Nos. 9 and 10/Chd/2025, time barred by 643 days. During proceeding before us, the ld. Counsel for the Assessee has brought it on record that the Applications for condonation of delay

KDDL ETHOS FOUNDATION,CHANDIGARH vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, EXEMPTIONS , CHANDIGARH

In the result, all the captioned appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 9/CHANDI/2025[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh08 Jul 2025AY 2022-23

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Krinwant Sahayआयकर अपील सं./ Ita Nos. 7 To 10/Chd/2025 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2022-23 [ U/S 12Aa & 80G ] Kddl Ethos Foundation, The Cit C/O Tej Mohan Singh, बनाम (Exemptions), Advocate, Chandigarh Vs. 527, Sector 10-D, Chandigarh "थायी लेखा सं./ Pan No: Aactk7915Q अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

For Appellant: Sh. Tej Mohan Singh, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Meenakshi Vohra, CIT DR
Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 80GSection 80G(5)

iii) and two are for Registration u/s 80G(5) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short 'the Act'). 3. The Registry has marked two appeals i.e., in ITA Nos. 9 and 10/Chd/2025, time barred by 643 days. During proceeding before us, the ld. Counsel for the Assessee has brought it on record that the Applications for condonation of delay

SHRI ISHWAR HARI CHARITABLE TRUST,SANGRUR vs. CIT EXEMPTIONS, CHANDIGARH

ITA 475/CHANDI/2023[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh24 Mar 2025AY 2022-23

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Krinwant Sahay

For Appellant: Shri T.N.Singla, CAFor Respondent: Shri Chandrajit Singh, CIT DR
Section 12ASection 249Section 253Section 3Section 5Section 80G

iii) and dated 28.09.2022 (passed in Form No. 10AD for grant of registration under Section 80G. 2. The Registry has pointed out that ITA 475/CHD/2023 is time barred by 228 days. In order to explain the delay, the assessee has filed an application contending therein that both the appeals were required to be filed simultaneously because there is only

GASTROENTEROLOGY PATIENT CARE WELFARE AND RESEARCH TRUST,CHANDIGARH vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX EXEMPTIONS, CHANDIGARH

In the result, the appeal of the Assessee is allowed

ITA 98/CHANDI/2024[2023-24]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh17 May 2024AY 2023-24

Bench: Shri A.D. Jain & Dr Krinwant Sahayआयकर अपील सं./ Ita No. 98/Chd/2024 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2023-24 Gastroenterology Patient Care Vs. The Commissioner Welfare & Research Trust, बनाम Of Income Tax Department Of Gastroenterology, Exemptions, F-Block, Nehru Hospital, Chandigarh Pgimer, Sector 12, Chandigarh "थायी लेखा सं./Pan No: Aadtg8271C अपीलाथ" ./ Appellant ""यथ" / Respondent ( Hybrid Mode ) "नधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee By : Sh. S.K Bhasin, C.A. राज"व क" ओर से/ Revenue By : Shri Rohit Sharma, Cit Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 16.05.2024 उदघोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement : 17.05.2024

For Appellant: Sh. S.K Bhasin, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Rohit Sharma, CIT DR
Section 80G(5)

delay in filing the appeal is condoned and as such, we proceeded to hear the appeal on merits. 3. Brief facts of the case are that the Assessee is a Trust created by eminent doctors of Department of Gastroenterology, PGIMER, Chandigarh. The Assessee made an application under clause (iii) of the first proviso to section 80G(5

WOMEN SPORTS FOUNDATION,KARNAL vs. ITO, CHANDIGARH

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 777/CHANDI/2023[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh12 Aug 2024AY 2022-23

Bench: Shri Vikram Singh Yadav & Shri Paresh M. Joshiआयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.777/Chd/2023 िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year:2022-23 Women Sports Vs. The Cit, बनाम Exemption, Foundation, Chandigarh Kbc-4 Chd City, Sector 45, Karnal, Haryana "थायीलेखासं./Pan No: Aaaaw3913F ""यथ"/Repsondent अपीलाथ"/Appellant ( Virtual Hearing ) िनधा"रतीक"ओरसे/Assessee By : None राज"वक"ओरसे/ Revenue By : Smt. Kusum Bansal, Cit Dr सुनवाईक"तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 05.08.2024 उदघोषणाक"तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 12.08.2024 आदेश/Order

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Smt. Kusum Bansal, CIT DR
Section 253Section 80GSection 80G(5)

iii) of first proviso to section 80G(5) of the Act that where the trust or institution has been provisionally approval u/s 80G it has to make an application for registration u/s 80G within six months of commencement of activities. In the absence of any submission from the applicant it is not possible to ascertain the objects and activities carried

SHRI ISHWAR HARI CHARITABLE TRUST,SNAGRUR vs. CIT EXEMPTIONS, CHANDIGARH

ITA 719/CHANDI/2022[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh24 Mar 2025AY 2022-23
For Appellant: Shri T.N.Singla, CAFor Respondent: Shri Chandrajit Singh, CIT DR
Section 249Section 253Section 3Section 5Section 80G

iii) and dated 28.09.2022 (passed in Form No. 10AD\nfor grant of registration under Section 80G.\n2. The Registry has pointed out that ITA 475/CHD/2023 is\ntime barred by 228 days. In order to explain the delay, the\nassessee has filed an application contending therein that both\nthe appeals were required to be filed simultaneously because\nthere is only

SANT KIRPAL VIDYAK MISSION,LUDHIANA vs. ITO (EXEMPTION), CHANDIGARH

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 561/CHANDI/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh02 May 2025AY 2017-18
Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 154Section 250

80G of IT Act if applicable\nd. Certificate of Registration from Charity Commissioner\ne. Certificate Details of any amendment made in the Trust Deed since\nincorporation.\n3.5 The assessee vide its reply dated 03.03.2021 had complied with the notice\nissued by the Assessing Officer. The reply of the assessee is available at page 41\nand 42, the typed copy

SHREE OM BABA JI EDUCATION & WELFARE TRUST,PANCHKULA vs. CIT EXEMPTION CHANDIGARH, CHANDIGARH

The appeal stands allowed

ITA 368/CHANDI/2025[NOT APPLICABLE]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh15 Jul 2025

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Rajpal Yadav & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am आयकरअपीलसं./ Ita No.368 /Chandi/2025 Shree Om Baba Ji Education & Cit (Exemption) बनाम/ Welfare Trust Room No1 5Th Floor # 104-A, Ghs-86, Sector 20 Cr Building, Himalaya Marg Vs. Panchkula 134120 Sector 17-E, Chandigarh-160017. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Aacts-7923-G (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ" / Respondent) : अपीलाथ"कीओरसे/ Appellant By : Shri S.P. Goyal – Ld. Ar ""थ"कीओरसे/Respondent By : Shri Sarabjeet Singh (Cit) – Ld. Dr सुनवाईकीतारीख/Date Of Hearing : 10-07-2025 घोषणाकीतारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 15-07-2025 आदेश / O R D E R Manoj Kumar Aggarwal () 1. Aggrieved By Rejection Of An Application Filed By The Assessee Seeking Registration U/S 12A(1)(Ac)(Iii) Vide Impugned Order Dated 20- 02-2023 Of Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemption), Chandigarh, [Cit(E)], The Assessee Is In Further Appeal Before Us. The Registry Has Noted Delay Of 682 Days In The Appeal, The Condonation Of Which Has Been Sought By Ld. Ar Which Is Supported By An Affidavit Of Trustee Of Assessee-Trust. It Has Been Stated That Delay Occurred Due To Incorrect Understanding Of Registration Procedure Under New Regime.

For Appellant: Shri S.P. Goyal – Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri Sarabjeet Singh (CIT) – Ld. DR
Section 12(1)(ac)Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 80G(5)(i)

iii) vide impugned order dated 20- 02-2023 of Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Chandigarh, [CIT(E)], the assessee is in further appeal before us. The registry has noted delay of 682 days in the appeal, the condonation of which has been sought by Ld. AR which is supported by an affidavit of trustee of assessee-trust