Search: condonation of delay

2 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 144C(13)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi71 Mumbai29 Hyderabad19 Kolkata17 Chennai15 Jaipur10 Bangalore8 Pune5 Ahmedabad4 Indore3 Visakhapatnam2 Chandigarh2 Dehradun2 Rajkot2 Cochin1 Raipur1 Agra1 SC1 Nagpur1

Key Topics

Section 80G7 Section 37(1)2

DCIT, C-1(1) , CHANDIGARH vs. M/S FIDELITY INFORMATION SERVICES INDIA PVT. LTD., CHANDIGARH

In the result, the cross-objection filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 1328/CHANDI/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh07 Jun 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: SHRI. AAKASH DEEP JAIN (Vice President), SHRI. VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Vishal Kalra, Advocate and Ms. Sumisha, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Rohit Sharma, CIT DR

Section 37(1)

144C(13) r.w.s. 143(3) dated 31.10.2012 & for A.Y. 2008-09, that the AO has held that the assessee had failed to show how the inclusion of the expenses was done in the cost charged by the assessee company to its client. Further, the AO held that the assessee failed to explain how these expenses related to the normal business

JONANG BUDDHIST EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,KANGRA, HIMACHAL PRADESH vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, EXEMPTIONS, CHANDIGARH , CHANDIGARH

In the result, Assessee’s appeal is dismissed