DCIT, C-1 (EXEMPTIONS), CHANDIGARH vs. THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS SOCIETY, LUDHIANA

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

13.(1) Nothing contained in Section 11 or Section 12 shall operate so as toexclude\nfrom the total income of the previous year of the person in receipt thereof—\n(c) in the case of a trust for charitable

M/S ARYANS EDUCATIONAL AND CHARITABLE TRUST,MOHALI vs. DCIT, C-1, (E), CHANDIGARH

In the result, the appeal of the Assessee is partly allowed

Bench: Shri A.D. Jain & Dr Krinwant Sahayआयकर अपील सं./ Ita No. 823/Chd/2019 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2015-16 M/S Aryans Educational & Vs. The Dcit, बनाम Charitable Trust, Circle-1 (Exemptions), # 2129, Phase-10, Chandigarh Mohali "थायी लेखा सं./Pan No: Aabta7550L अपीलाथ"/ Appellant ""यथ"/ Repsondent

Section 13(1)(c) and 13(1)(d) r.w.s. 13(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short 'the Act'). 4. Brief facts of the case, as enumerated in the order of the CIT(A) are as under:- 823--Chd-2019 – M/s Aryans Educational and Charitable Trust

J.K. EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,JAMMU & KASHMIR vs. DCIT (EXEMPTION)-CIRCLE-1,, CHANDIGARH

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

Bench: SHRI. AAKASH DEEP JAIN (Vice President), SHRI. VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member)

section 13(1)(c). 6.6 It was further submitted that under the same and similar circumstances, the Ld. CIT(A) accepted the appeal of the assessee in the case of M/s Om Parkash Bansal Charitable Trust

J. K. EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,JAMMU vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-1, CHANDIGARH

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

Bench: SHRI. AAKASH DEEP JAIN (Vice President), SHRI. VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member)

section 13(1)(c). 6.6 It was further submitted that under the same and similar circumstances, the Ld. CIT(A) accepted the appeal of the assessee in the case of M/s Om Parkash Bansal Charitable Trust

J.K.EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,JAMMU vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTION), CHANDIGARH

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

Bench: SHRI. AAKASH DEEP JAIN (Vice President), SHRI. VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member)

section 13(1)(c). 6.6 It was further submitted that under the same and similar circumstances, the Ld. CIT(A) accepted the appeal of the assessee in the case of M/s Om Parkash Bansal Charitable Trust

CHANDIGARH EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,MOHALI vs. PR.CIT(CENTRAL)-GURGAON, AT CHANDIGARH

Charitable Trust Vs. Director of Income Tax [2008] 297 ITR 66 (Del) • Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. M/s Audh Educational Society [2011] 203 Taxman 0166 (All.) • Tekprolu Bapanaiah, Vidyadharma Nidhi Trust Vs. CIT [1987] 167 ITR 482 399(AP). 5.16 The Ld. Pr CIT was of the view that once the provisions of section 13(1)(c

CHANDIGARH EDUCATIONAL TRUST,MOHALI vs. PR.CIT-CENTRAL,GURGAON, AT CHANDIGARH

Charitable Trust Vs. Director of Income Tax [2008] 297 ITR 66 (Del) • Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. M/s Audh Educational Society [2011] 203 Taxman 0166 (All.) • Tekprolu Bapanaiah, Vidyadharma Nidhi Trust Vs. CIT [1987] 167 ITR 482 399(AP). 5.16 The Ld. Pr CIT was of the view that once the provisions of section 13(1)(c

SHRI GURU RAM DASS EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,MOHALI vs. PR.CIT(CENTRAL) GURGAON, AT CHANDIGARH

Charitable Trust Vs. Director of Income Tax [2008] 297 ITR 66 (Del) • Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. M/s Audh Educational Society [2011] 203 Taxman 0166 (All.) • Tekprolu Bapanaiah, Vidyadharma Nidhi Trust Vs. CIT [1987] 167 ITR 482 399(AP). 5.16 The Ld. Pr CIT was of the view that once the provisions of section 13(1)(c

DCIT, CHANDIGARH vs. M/S SHRI GURU GOBIND SINGH FOUNDATION, MOGA

In the result all the above appeals filed by the Revenue

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Ms. Annapurna Gupta

section 13(1)(c) of the Act, for the purpose of claiming exemption, The AO also denied the exemption since he found that the said advance was in violation of the prescribed modes of investments of funds of trusts claiming exemption u/s 10(230) of the Act, as prescribed u/s 13

DCIT, CHANDIGARH vs. M/S SHIVA EDUCATIONAL TRUST, MOGA

In the result all the above appeals filed by the Revenue

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Ms. Annapurna Gupta

section 13(1)(c) of the Act, for the purpose of claiming exemption, The AO also denied the exemption since he found that the said advance was in violation of the prescribed modes of investments of funds of trusts claiming exemption u/s 10(230) of the Act, as prescribed u/s 13

DCIT, CHANDIGARH vs. ACE EDUCATIONAL & CHARITABLE SOCIETY, MOGA

In the result all the above appeals filed by the Revenue

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Ms. Annapurna Gupta

section 13(1)(c) of the Act, for the purpose of claiming exemption, The AO also denied the exemption since he found that the said advance was in violation of the prescribed modes of investments of funds of trusts claiming exemption u/s 10(230) of the Act, as prescribed u/s 13

DCIT, C-1 (EXEMPTIONS), CHANDIGARH vs. ACE EDUCATIONAL & CHARITABLE SOCIETY, MOGA

In the result all the above appeals filed by the Revenue

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Ms. Annapurna Gupta

section 13(1)(c) of the Act, for the purpose of claiming exemption, The AO also denied the exemption since he found that the said advance was in violation of the prescribed modes of investments of funds of trusts claiming exemption u/s 10(230) of the Act, as prescribed u/s 13

DCIT, C-1 (EXEMPTIONS), CHANDIGARH vs. M/S SHIVA EDUCATIONAL TRUST, MOGA

In the result all the above appeals filed by the Revenue

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Ms. Annapurna Gupta

section 13(1)(c) of the Act, for the purpose of claiming exemption, The AO also denied the exemption since he found that the said advance was in violation of the prescribed modes of investments of funds of trusts claiming exemption u/s 10(230) of the Act, as prescribed u/s 13

M/S CHANDIGARH LAWN TENNIS ASSOCIATION,CHANDIGARH vs. ITO (EXEMPTIONS), CHANDIGARH

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Ms. Annapurna Guptaassessment Year : 2013-14 Chandigarh Lawn Tennis Vs. The Ito (Exemptions), Association, Ward, Chandigarh Sector 10, Chandigarh Pan No. Aaatc4943J (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By : Sh. Y.K. Sud, Ca Respondent By : Smt. Chanderkanta, Addl. Cit (On 22.3.2018) & Sh.Yoginder Mittal, Sr. Dr (On 13.7.2018) Date Of Hearing : 22.03.2018 & 13.7.2018 Date Of Pronouncement : 26.07.2018

13(8) is upheld. Ground of appeal No. 1, 2, 3 and 4 are dismissed.” ITA No. 1382/Chd/2016- Chandigarh Lawn Tennis Association, Chandigarh 6 5. Being aggrieved by the said order of the Ld. CIT(A), the assessee has come in appeal before us. 6. Sh. Y.K. Sud, the Ld. Counsel for the assessee has made oral as well

M/S ARYANS EDUCATIONAL AND CHARITABLE TRUST,MOHALI vs. DCIT, C-1, (E), CHANDIGARH

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

Bench: Shri A.D. Jain & Dr Krinwant Sahayआयकर अपील सं./ Ita No. 821/Chd/2019 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2013-14 M/S Aryans Educational & Vs. The Dcit, Circle-1 Charitable Trust, बनाम (Exemptions), # 2129, Phase-10, Chandigarh Mohali "थायी लेखा सं./Pan No: Aabta7550L

Charitable Trust, Mohali 14 whether only that part of income which goes to the benefit of specified person will only lose the exemption. The IT AT felt that of section 13(1)(c

DCIT, C-1, (E), CHANDIGARH vs. M/S MANAV MANGAL SOCIETY, CHANDIGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed and all the appeals of the department are dismissed

Charitable or Religious trust-Denial of exemption (sub-section (1)(c)-Assessment year 2010-11- Assessee Trust was running a school-t paid rent to HUF whose Karta was trust of assessee trust-Assessing Officer taking a view that such payment breached section 13

DCIT, C-1, (E), CHANDIGARH vs. M/S MANAV MANGAL SOCIETY, CHANDIGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed and all the appeals of the department are dismissed

Charitable or Religious trust-Denial of exemption (sub-section (1)(c)-Assessment year 2010-11- Assessee Trust was running a school-t paid rent to HUF whose Karta was trust of assessee trust-Assessing Officer taking a view that such payment breached section 13

DCIT, C-1, (E), CHANDIGARH vs. M/S MANAV MANGAL SOCIETY, CHANDIGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed and all the appeals of the department are dismissed

Charitable or Religious trust-Denial of exemption (sub-section (1)(c)-Assessment year 2010-11- Assessee Trust was running a school-t paid rent to HUF whose Karta was trust of assessee trust-Assessing Officer taking a view that such payment breached section 13

DCIT,CIRCLE-1(EXEMPTION), CHANDIGARH vs. M/S MANAV MANGAL SCHOOL( MANAV MANGAL SOCIETY), CHANDIGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed and all the appeals of the department are dismissed

Charitable or Religious trust-Denial of exemption (sub-section (1)(c)-Assessment year 2010-11- Assessee Trust was running a school-t paid rent to HUF whose Karta was trust of assessee trust-Assessing Officer taking a view that such payment breached section 13