BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

32 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 02clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai289Delhi195Chennai128Bangalore119Jaipur89Karnataka86Ahmedabad81Kolkata64Hyderabad62Pune51Surat37Chandigarh32Cochin31Lucknow29Cuttack26Calcutta16Indore14Amritsar10Rajkot8Visakhapatnam7Allahabad6Nagpur5Raipur5Rajasthan3Ranchi3Agra2Jabalpur2Dehradun2SC2Jodhpur2Telangana2Varanasi2Guwahati1

Key Topics

Section 12A47Section 26342Section 13(3)24Exemption22Section 143(3)20Section 1112Section 80G11Addition to Income9Section 250

CT EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,JALANDHAR vs. DCIT, CHANDIGARH

In the result, the appeal filed by the Assessee is Partly Allowed for\nStatistical Purposes as per the directions above

ITA 396/CHANDI/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh10 Dec 2025AY 2016-17
For Appellant: Shri Ashray Sarna, CA(Virtual Mode)For Respondent: Shri Manav Bansal, CIT, DR
Section 11Section 12ASection 13(1)(c)Section 13(2)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 2(15)Section 250

Section 2(15) (Para 5.3 and 5.6 of the\nCIT(A) Order).\nΟ\nDeleting the addition of Rs.21,02,000/- on account of salaries paid\nto specified persons.\nΟ\nAllowing the disallowance of Interest (Rs.10,61,466/-) and\nDepreciation (Rs.41,31,404/-) for statistical purposes, directing the AO to\nverify the additional evidence filed by the Assessee, while noting

Showing 1–20 of 32 · Page 1 of 2

8
Section 107
Limitation/Time-bar4
Natural Justice4

SIR AUROBINDO SOCIO ECONOMIC & MANAGEMENT RESEARCH INSTITUTE,LUDHIANA vs. DCIT, C-1 (E), CHANDIGARH

In the result, whereas the assessee's appeal in ITA

ITA 1348/CHANDI/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh01 May 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: SHRI A.D.JAIN (Vice President), SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Tej Mohan Singh, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Kusum Bansal, CIT, DR
Section 11Section 11(1)Section 11(2)

02,031/- had been generated in the form of buses rental income, DG Set usages receipt, interest income, and miscellaneous income; that the assessee was, thus, earning huge surplus from activities other than education; that the assessee was not fulfilling the conditions of Section 11(1) of the Income Tax Act and was not doing charitable activities; that

DCIT, C-1 (E), CHANDIGARH vs. M/S SHRI AUROBINDO SOCIO ECONOMIC & MANAGEMENT RESEARCH INSTITUTE, LUDHINA

In the result, whereas the assessee's appeal in ITA

ITA 1375/CHANDI/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh01 May 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: SHRI A.D.JAIN (Vice President), SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Tej Mohan Singh, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Kusum Bansal, CIT, DR
Section 11Section 11(1)Section 11(2)

02,031/- had been generated in the form of buses rental income, DG Set usages receipt, interest income, and miscellaneous income; that the assessee was, thus, earning huge surplus from activities other than education; that the assessee was not fulfilling the conditions of Section 11(1) of the Income Tax Act and was not doing charitable activities; that

PUNJAB HERITAGE & TOURISM PROMOTION BOARD,CHANDIGARH vs. CIT EXEMPTIONS, CHANDIGARH

The appeal stand allowed in terms of our above order

ITA 1126/CHANDI/2024[2024-25]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh07 Oct 2025AY 2024-25

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Rajpal Yadav & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.1126/Chandi/2024 Punjab Heritage & Tourism Promotion Board Cit (Exemptions) C/O Rajiv Goel & Associates बनाम/ Aaykar Bhawan. Sco 823-824,Sector 22-A Sector 17-E Vs. Chandigarh-160022. Chandigarh-160017 "ायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.Aaatp-6562-G (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (""थ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ"कीओरसे/ Appellant By : Shri Dhruv Goel (Ca) -Ld. Ar ""थ"कीओरसे/Respondent By : Smt. Kusum Bansal (Cit) (Virtual) – Ld. Dr सुनवाईकीतारीख/Date Of Hearing : 17-09-2025 घोषणाकीतारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 07/10/2025 आदेश / O R D E R Manoj Kumar Aggarwal () 1. Aggrieved By Cancellation Of Registrations U/S 12A As Well As U/S 12A(1)(Ac)(I) Vide Order Dated 04-11-2024 Of Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemption), Chandigarh, [Cit(E)], The Assessee Is In Further Appeal Before Us With Following Grounds Of Appeal: - 1. That The Learned Cit(E) Has Erred In Law & On Facts In Initiating Proceedings For Cancellation Of Registration U/S 12A & Observing That Assessee Had Committed A Specified Violation As Defined In Section 12Ab(4)(Ii). 2. That The Learned Cit(E) Has Erred In Law & On Facts In Cancelling The Registration U/S 12A Of The Assessee As Per Provisions Of Section 12Ab(4)(Ii) Of The Act. 3. That The Learned C1T(E) Has Erred In Law & On Facts In Cancelling The Registration U/S 12A With Retrospective Effect From Ay 2010-11 Onwards.

For Appellant: Shri Dhruv Goel (CA) -Ld. ARFor Respondent: Smt. Kusum Bansal (CIT) (Virtual) – Ld. DR
Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 148ASection 2(15)

02-07-2008 as well as registration granted by CPC on 06-04-2022 in the new regime. The assessee was accordingly show-caused. 2.3 The assessee defended its registration on the ground that the assessee’s Board was constituted by the Punjab State Government in the year 2002 and it was to be registered as a Public Charitable Trust

DCIT, C-1, (E), CHANDIGARH vs. M/S MANAV MANGAL SOCIETY, CHANDIGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed and all the appeals of the department are dismissed

ITA 136/CHANDI/2020[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh27 May 2021AY 2010-11
For Appellant: Shri Sudhir Sehgal, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sandeep Dahiya, CIT-DR
Section 13(3)

02 & 03/Chd/2020 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2010-11 & 2011-12 M/s Manav Mangal Society, Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax, बनाम Sector-21-C, Circle-1, (Exemptions), Chandigarh. Chandigarh. "थायी लेखा सं./PAN NO: AAAAM0564C अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent आयकर अपील सं./ ITA Nos. 136 & 137/Chd/2020 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2010-11 & 2011-12 Dy. Commissioner of Income

DCIT, C-1, (E), CHANDIGARH vs. M/S MANAV MANGAL SOCIETY, CHANDIGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed and all the appeals of the department are dismissed

ITA 28/CHANDI/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh27 May 2021AY 2014-15
For Appellant: Shri Sudhir Sehgal, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sandeep Dahiya, CIT-DR
Section 13(3)

02 & 03/Chd/2020 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2010-11 & 2011-12 M/s Manav Mangal Society, Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax, बनाम Sector-21-C, Circle-1, (Exemptions), Chandigarh. Chandigarh. "थायी लेखा सं./PAN NO: AAAAM0564C अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent आयकर अपील सं./ ITA Nos. 136 & 137/Chd/2020 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2010-11 & 2011-12 Dy. Commissioner of Income

DCIT, C-1, (E), CHANDIGARH vs. M/S MANAV MANGAL SOCIETY, CHANDIGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed and all the appeals of the department are dismissed

ITA 137/CHANDI/2020[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh27 May 2021AY 2011-12
For Appellant: Shri Sudhir Sehgal, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sandeep Dahiya, CIT-DR
Section 13(3)

02 & 03/Chd/2020 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2010-11 & 2011-12 M/s Manav Mangal Society, Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax, बनाम Sector-21-C, Circle-1, (Exemptions), Chandigarh. Chandigarh. "थायी लेखा सं./PAN NO: AAAAM0564C अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent आयकर अपील सं./ ITA Nos. 136 & 137/Chd/2020 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2010-11 & 2011-12 Dy. Commissioner of Income

DCIT, C-1, (E), CHANDIGARH vs. M/S MANAV MANGAL SOCIETY, CHANDIGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed and all the appeals of the department are dismissed

ITA 30/CHANDI/2020[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh27 May 2021AY 2016-17
For Appellant: Shri Sudhir Sehgal, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sandeep Dahiya, CIT-DR
Section 13(3)

02 & 03/Chd/2020 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2010-11 & 2011-12 M/s Manav Mangal Society, Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax, बनाम Sector-21-C, Circle-1, (Exemptions), Chandigarh. Chandigarh. "थायी लेखा सं./PAN NO: AAAAM0564C अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent आयकर अपील सं./ ITA Nos. 136 & 137/Chd/2020 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2010-11 & 2011-12 Dy. Commissioner of Income

M/S MANAV MANGAL SOCIETY,CHANDIGARH vs. DCIT, C-1, (E), CHANDIGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed and all the appeals of the department are dismissed

ITA 3/CHANDI/2020[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh27 May 2021AY 2011-12
For Appellant: Shri Sudhir Sehgal, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sandeep Dahiya, CIT-DR
Section 13(3)

02 & 03/Chd/2020 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2010-11 & 2011-12 M/s Manav Mangal Society, Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax, बनाम Sector-21-C, Circle-1, (Exemptions), Chandigarh. Chandigarh. "थायी लेखा सं./PAN NO: AAAAM0564C अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent आयकर अपील सं./ ITA Nos. 136 & 137/Chd/2020 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2010-11 & 2011-12 Dy. Commissioner of Income

DCIT, C-1, (E), CHANDIGARH vs. M/S MANAV MANGAL SOCIETY, CHANDIGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed and all the appeals of the department are dismissed

ITA 29/CHANDI/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh27 May 2021AY 2015-16
For Appellant: Shri Sudhir Sehgal, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sandeep Dahiya, CIT-DR
Section 13(3)

02 & 03/Chd/2020 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2010-11 & 2011-12 M/s Manav Mangal Society, Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax, बनाम Sector-21-C, Circle-1, (Exemptions), Chandigarh. Chandigarh. "थायी लेखा सं./PAN NO: AAAAM0564C अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent आयकर अपील सं./ ITA Nos. 136 & 137/Chd/2020 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2010-11 & 2011-12 Dy. Commissioner of Income

DCIT,CIRCLE-1(EXEMPTION), CHANDIGARH vs. M/S MANAV MANGAL SCHOOL( MANAV MANGAL SOCIETY), CHANDIGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed and all the appeals of the department are dismissed

ITA 27/CHANDI/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh27 May 2021AY 2013-14
For Appellant: Shri Sudhir Sehgal, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sandeep Dahiya, CIT-DR
Section 13(3)

02 & 03/Chd/2020 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2010-11 & 2011-12 M/s Manav Mangal Society, Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax, बनाम Sector-21-C, Circle-1, (Exemptions), Chandigarh. Chandigarh. "थायी लेखा सं./PAN NO: AAAAM0564C अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent आयकर अपील सं./ ITA Nos. 136 & 137/Chd/2020 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2010-11 & 2011-12 Dy. Commissioner of Income

M/S MANAV MANGAL SOCIETY,CHANDIGARH vs. DCIT, C-1, (E), CHANDIGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed and all the appeals of the department are dismissed

ITA 2/CHANDI/2020[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh27 May 2021AY 2010-11
For Appellant: Shri Sudhir Sehgal, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sandeep Dahiya, CIT-DR
Section 13(3)

02 & 03/Chd/2020 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2010-11 & 2011-12 M/s Manav Mangal Society, Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax, बनाम Sector-21-C, Circle-1, (Exemptions), Chandigarh. Chandigarh. "थायी लेखा सं./PAN NO: AAAAM0564C अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent आयकर अपील सं./ ITA Nos. 136 & 137/Chd/2020 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2010-11 & 2011-12 Dy. Commissioner of Income

RAINBOW INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR EDUCATION (RISE),KANGRA vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), CHANDIGARH

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 245/CHANDI/2020[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh30 Mar 2021AY 2017-18
For Appellant: Shri Parikshit Aggarwal, CAFor Respondent: Shri Sandeep Dahiya, CIT
Section 10

section 10(23C)(vi) of the Act, vide its application in Form No.56D dated 04.06.2018. The Ld.CIT(E) after taking note of the aims and objects of the applicant society proceeded to determine whether its activities were in sync with the stated objects and accordingly sought certain clarifications/documents to be provided by the assessee, which find mention at para

SANT KIRPAL VIDYAK MISSION,LUDHIANA vs. ITO (EXEMPTION), CHANDIGARH

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 561/CHANDI/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh02 May 2025AY 2017-18
Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 154Section 250

02-04-\n2019 declaring NIL income belatedly and also filed audit report in form 10B on\n31-08-2018 after due date. The case was selected for complete scrutiny.\n3.2 It is observed by the AO that the appellant filed its ITR for the A.Y. 2017-18\non 17.3.2018 belatedly and audit report in form 10B was filed

SH. LACHHMAN DASS BANSAL,BARNALA vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, PATIALA

The appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 34/CHANDI/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh12 Jan 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: SHRI. AAKASH DEEP JAIN (Vice President), SHRI. VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Sudhir Sehgal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Amanpreet Kaur, Sr. D.R
Section 115BSection 133ASection 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 69Section 69A

02,10,485/- as against the returned income of Rs. 27,39,850/- 4. Being aggrieved, the assessee carried the matter in appeal before the ld CIT(A) who has granted part relief to the assessee and against the additions sustained by the ld CIT(A), the assessee is now in appeal before us. 5. During the course of hearing

SHRI MAHAVIR NIRWAN MEMORIAL SOCIETY,MOHALI vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), CHANDIGARH

In the result, appeal filed by the Assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 251/CHANDI/2024[2024-24]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh03 Mar 2025AY 2024-24

Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Mohit Dhiman, C.AFor Respondent: Smt. Kusum Bansal, CIT, DR
Section 12A

02-Item (A) of sub- clause (vi) of clause (ac) of sub-section (1) of section 12A r.w.s 12AB of the income tax Act dated 01.06.2023 and the assessee had been granted provisional registration as per form 10AC issued on 08.06.2023 as applicable from AY 2024-25 to 2026-27. 5.1 The assesse had commenced its activities on 08.06.2023 when

SHRI MAHAVIR NIRWAN MEMORIAL SOCIETY,MOHALI vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), CHANDIGARH

In the result, appeal filed by the Assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 250/CHANDI/2024[2024-25]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh03 Mar 2025AY 2024-25

Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Mohit Dhiman, C.AFor Respondent: Smt. Kusum Bansal, CIT, DR
Section 12A

02-Item (A) of sub- clause (vi) of clause (ac) of sub-section (1) of section 12A r.w.s 12AB of the income tax Act dated 01.06.2023 and the assessee had been granted provisional registration as per form 10AC issued on 08.06.2023 as applicable from AY 2024-25 to 2026-27. 5.1 The assesse had commenced its activities on 08.06.2023 when

FI FOUNDATION,KALKA vs. JAISHREE SHARMA, CIT EXEMPTIONS, CHANDIGARH, CHANDIGARH

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 285/CHANDI/2024[2024-2025]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh30 Aug 2024AY 2024-2025

Bench: SHRI. VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member), SHRI. PARESH M. JOSHI (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Aman Singh, DirectorFor Respondent: Shri Rohit Sharma, CIT DR
Section 80Section 80G

02, Opp. Raju Marriage Chandigarh Palace, Tagra, Hakimpur Kalka "ायी लेखा सं./PAN NO: AAECF9756H अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""थ"/Respondent िनधा"रती की ओर से/Assessee by : Shri Aman Singh, Director राज" की ओर से/ Revenue by : Shri Rohit Sharma, CIT DR सुनवाई की तारीख/Date of Hearing : 22/08/2024 उदघोषणा की तारीख/Date of Pronouncement : 30/08/2024 आदेश/Order PER VIKRAM SINGH

KRISHNA CONSCIOUSNESS & WELFARE TRUST,LUDHIANA vs. ITO, WARD-6(1), LUDHIANA

In the result, appeal of the Assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 330/CHANDI/2023[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh20 Jan 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: The Ld. Cit(A) Who Has Since Sustained He Said Addition.

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Vivek Vardhan, Addl.CIT
Section 12ASection 143(3)

02,053/- was brought to tax in absence of 2 registration under section 12A of the Act. Being aggrieved, the assessee carried the matter in appeal before the Ld. CIT(A) who has since sustained he said addition. 3. Against the said findings, the assessee is in appeal before us. During the course of hearing, none appeared on behalf

M/S SHUBHAM COTTON MILLS PVT. LTD.,ELLENABAD vs. DCIT, CIRCLE, SIRSA

In the result appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1416/CHANDI/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh05 Oct 2021AY 2015-16
For Appellant: Shri Gautam Jain, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Ashok Kumar, Addl. CIT
Section 133ASection 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 145(3)Section 234Section 234B

02,920 5884.01 ii) 2013-14 127788.11 145,98,31,366 7780.47 iii) 2014-15 344485.01 207,06,67,668 6010.91 III. It is submitted that sale realization of guar gum in the instant year is as under: Period Amount Sr. Weight (in Average Rate No. qtls) i) 69165.15 105,05,70,605 15189.31 Pre survey upto