SIR AUROBINDO SOCIO ECONOMIC & MANAGEMENT RESEARCH INSTITUTE,LUDHIANA vs. DCIT, C-1 (E), CHANDIGARH
In the result, whereas the assessee's appeal in ITA
ITA 1348/CHANDI/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh01 May 2024AY 2015-16
Bench: SHRI A.D.JAIN (Vice President), SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member)
For Appellant: Shri Tej Mohan Singh, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Kusum Bansal, CIT, DR
Section 11Section 11(1)Section 11(2)
02,031/- had been
generated in the form of buses rental income, DG Set usages
receipt, interest income, and miscellaneous income; that the
assessee was, thus, earning huge surplus from activities
other than education; that the assessee was not fulfilling the
conditions of Section 11(1) of the Income Tax Act and was
not doing charitable activities; that