M/S GALLEY FINANCIERS & PROPERTY CONSULTANTS PVT. LTD.,PATIALA vs. ITO, PATIALA
In the result, the appeal of the assessee partly allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 51/CHANDI/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh09 Jul 2019AY 2010-11
Bench: Smt.Diva Singh & Smt.Annapurna Guptaआयकर अपील सं./ Ita No.51/Chd/2016 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2010-11
For Appellant: Shri Rishabh Kapoor, AdvFor Respondent: Smt.Chanderkanta, Sr.DR
Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 250(6)Section 68
bogus shareholders, whose names were given to the Assessing Officer, then Department was free to proceed to reopen their individual assessments in accordance with the law but this amount of share application money could not be regarded as undisclosed income under section 68, of the asseessee company.”
4. Referring to the above, the Ld.Counsel for the assessee
pointed out that