BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “bogus purchases”+ Section 80Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai19Delhi14Jaipur9Varanasi6Chennai6Lucknow6Ahmedabad4Kolkata4Chandigarh2Bangalore1Cuttack1Hyderabad1

Key Topics

Section 80C3Section 683Section 242Section 250(6)2Addition to Income2

ANJULA GOEL ,PARWANOO vs. DCIT, CC-II, CHANDIGARH

In the result, both the above appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 1174/CHANDI/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh12 Mar 2021AY 2015-16
For Appellant: S/Shri Ashwani Kumar, CAFor Respondent: Smt.C.Chandrakanta, CIT DR
Section 132(1)Section 132(4)Section 153ASection 153A(1)(b)Section 24Section 245D(4)Section 250(6)Section 68Section 80CSection 80T

section 153A(l]of the Act only prohibits the AO to pass any assessment after search with respect to pending assessment and the AO is empowered to issue notice u/s 153A to assess or reassess the total income of six assessment year in which such search was conducted or requisition was made. Further, reliance is placed on the case

M/S GALLEY FINANCIERS & PROPERTY CONSULTANTS PVT. LTD.,PATIALA vs. ITO, PATIALA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 51/CHANDI/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh09 Jul 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Smt.Diva Singh & Smt.Annapurna Guptaआयकर अपील सं./ Ita No.51/Chd/2016 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2010-11

For Appellant: Shri Rishabh Kapoor, AdvFor Respondent: Smt.Chanderkanta, Sr.DR
Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 250(6)Section 68

bogus shareholders, whose names were given to the Assessing Officer, then Department was free to proceed to reopen their individual assessments in accordance with the law but this amount of share application money could not be regarded as undisclosed income under section 68, of the asseessee company.” 4. Referring to the above, the Ld.Counsel for the assessee pointed out that