BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “TDS”+ Section 272A(2)(k)clear

Sorted by relevance

Pune199Delhi100Chennai87Mumbai69Bangalore48Karnataka26Allahabad22Ahmedabad19Kolkata18Cochin17Jaipur13Surat11Panaji10Agra8Visakhapatnam7Cuttack7Raipur7Nagpur6Lucknow5Hyderabad5Chandigarh5Varanasi5Jodhpur2Kerala1Indore1Guwahati1

Key Topics

Section 2509Section 272A(2)(k)9Section 1486Penalty3TDS3Section 115J2Reassessment2Addition to Income2Natural Justice2

M/S BNK INVESTMENTS,CHANDIGARH vs. JCIT (TDS), CHANDIGARH

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1385/CHANDI/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh04 Apr 2019AY 2011-12
For Appellant: Shri Tej Mohan SinghFor Respondent: Shri Yogender Mittal,Sr.DR
Section 206ASection 272A(2)(k)

272A(2)(k) had been levied, to the non- availability of correct PAN numbers of the deductees which was compulsorily required for filing/uploading the TDS returns in the impugned year. The Revenue has controverted the above facts stating that in earlier years also, the assessee was filing TDS returns indicating PAN of the deductee and that as per Section

RAJESH BANSAL,CHANDIGARH vs. ADDL. CIT (TDS), CHANDIGARH

In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands allowed

ITA 1447/CHANDI/2018[2012-13]Status: Disposed
ITAT Chandigarh
05 Apr 2019
AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri N.K. Saini & Shri Sanjay Gargआयकर अपील सं./ Ita No.1447/Chd/2018 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2012-13

For Appellant: Shri Pritish Goyal, CAFor Respondent: Shri Manjit Singh, CIT DR
Section 200(3)Section 250Section 272A(2)(k)

section 200(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) read with rule 31A of the Income Tax Rules, 1962. The A.O., therefore, levied the penalty for late filing of the TDS returns u/s 272A(2)(k

THE COMMANDER WORKS ENGINEERS,PATIALA vs. JCIT (TDS), CHANDIGARH

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1573/CHANDI/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh04 Jul 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Ms. Annapurna Guptathe Commander Works Engineers, Vs. The Jcit (Tds), Headquarter Bldg No.26, Chandigarh. New Lal Bagh, Patiala. Pan: Ptlh12424G (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Vibhor Garg, CAFor Respondent: Shri Surinder Meena, JCIT
Section 200Section 272A(2)(k)Section 274

272A(2)(k) read with section 274 of the Act not to be levied for late filing of the quarterly statements. In response, it was submitted that TDS

WARYAM STEEL CASTINGS PRIVATE LIMITED,LUDHIANA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-4, LUDHIANA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed and the Cross appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 715/CHANDI/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh14 May 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: SHRI. RAJPAL YADAV (Vice President), SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Ashwani Kumar, C.A and Ms. Muskan Garg, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Ved Parkash Kalia, Sr. DR
Section 115JSection 148Section 250

272A(1)(d) were initiated for under-reporting income, failure to file an audit report, and non-compliance with statutory notices, respectively. Interest under sections 234A, 234B, and 234C was also charged. 4. Against the order of the Ld. AO the assessee went in appeal before the Ld. CIT(A). The Ld. CIT(A) in the impugned order held

ASTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-4, LUDHIANA, AAYAKAR BHAWAN vs. WARYAM STEEL CASTING PRIVATE LIMITED, KANGANWAL ROAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed and the Cross appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 757/CHANDI/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh14 May 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: SHRI. RAJPAL YADAV (Vice President), SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Ashwani Kumar, C.A and Ms. Muskan Garg, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Ved Parkash Kalia, Sr. DR
Section 115JSection 148Section 250

272A(1)(d) were initiated for under-reporting income, failure to file an audit report, and non-compliance with statutory notices, respectively. Interest under sections 234A, 234B, and 234C was also charged. 4. Against the order of the Ld. AO the assessee went in appeal before the Ld. CIT(A). The Ld. CIT(A) in the impugned order held