Search: TDS | BharatTax

6 results for “TDS”+ Section 25Fclear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 1034 Section 143(1)5 Addition to Income5 Section 143(3)4 Section 10(10)3 Exemption3 Section 25F2 Condonation of Delay2

SATINDER PAUL THROUGH L/H NEELAM SAINI,PINJORE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, PANCHKULA

In the result, the ground no

ITA 136/CHANDI/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh30 Oct 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: SH. SANJAY GARG (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Smt. Neelam Dhiman, C.AFor Respondent: Dr. Ranjit Kaur, Addl. CIT, Sr.DR

Section 10Section 10(10)Section 143(1)

TDS. Accordingly, the ld.CIT (Appeals) sustained the addition made by the AO, against which the assessee is in appeal before this Tribunal. 3. At the outset, the ld. Counsel for the assessee stated that the matter is squarely covered by the decision of the Co- ordinate Bench of this Tribunal dated 07.09.2022 in ITA No.514/CHD/2022 in the case of Deepak

SATINDER PAUL THROUGH L/H NEELAM SAINI,PINJORE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, PANCHKULA

DAYAL SINGH,VILL FATEHPUR PO BUREWALA vs. ITO WARD-1, PANCHKULA

SATINDER PAUL THROUGH L/H NEELAM SAINI,PINJORE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, PANCHKULA

DAYAL SINGH,VILL FATEHPUR PO BUREWALA vs. ITO WARD-1, PANCHKULA

NIRMALA RANI L/H OF SH. AZAD SINGH,PINJORE vs. ITO, WARD -1, , PANCHKULA

NARESH KUMAR KAMBOJ,ZIRAKPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER , PANCHKULA

SH. SOHAN LAL,PINJORE vs. ITO, WARD -3, PANCHKULA

SH. MARTIN EKKA S/O SH. LALSAY EKKA,PANCHKULA vs. ITO, WARD -1, PANCHKULA