BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

10 results for “TDS”+ Section 190clear

Sorted by relevance

Patna322Delhi279Mumbai279Chennai132Bangalore131Karnataka92Hyderabad70Jaipur53Kolkata51Cochin46Pune42Ahmedabad40Raipur39Visakhapatnam29Indore23Cuttack21Lucknow20Surat10Chandigarh10Dehradun9Nagpur9Telangana7Allahabad4Jabalpur3SC2Guwahati2Jodhpur2Rajkot1Ranchi1Amritsar1

Key Topics

Section 2019Section 1488Section 115B8Addition to Income8Section 1477Section 143(3)6Section 69C6Section 201(1)6TDS6Disallowance

CHARAN SINGH,SIRSA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, SIRSA,

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 685/CHANDI/2025[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh26 Aug 2025AY 2022-23

Bench: The Tribunal.

For Appellant: Sh. Nikhil Garg, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Surinder Kaur Waraich, Addl. CIT
Section 143(1)Section 194QSection 44A

190 and claiming a refund of ₹63,590 on the basis of TDS credit of ₹72,215. The CPC, Bengaluru, while processing the return under section

M/S THE H.P. STATE CO-OPERATIVE BANK,CHAMBA vs. ITO (TDS), PALAMPUR

In the result all the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

4
Section 1323
Business Income2
ITA 330/CHANDI/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh05 Mar 2018AY 2010-11

Bench: Ms. Diva Singh & Dr. B.R.R.Kumar

For Appellant: Shri P.N. Arora (Advocate)For Respondent: Smt. Chandrakanta
Section 201Section 201(1)

TDS). 10. That even the software has wrongly deducted the tax on interest of saving accounts and term deposit accounts having interest paid less than Rs. 10000/- in the financial year. 11. That the AO has merely relied upon the audited balance-sheet and also the observation of the Auditor and has miserably failed to collect the factual position

M/S THE H.P. STATE CO-OPERATIVE BANK, BANIKHET BRANCH,CHAMBA vs. ITO (TDS), PALAMPUR

In the result all the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 334/CHANDI/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh05 Mar 2018AY 2010-11

Bench: Ms. Diva Singh & Dr. B.R.R.Kumar

For Appellant: Shri P.N. Arora (Advocate)For Respondent: Smt. Chandrakanta
Section 201Section 201(1)

TDS). 10. That even the software has wrongly deducted the tax on interest of saving accounts and term deposit accounts having interest paid less than Rs. 10000/- in the financial year. 11. That the AO has merely relied upon the audited balance-sheet and also the observation of the Auditor and has miserably failed to collect the factual position

M/S THE H.P. STATE CO-OPERATIVE BANK, DALHOUSIE BRANCH,CHAMBA vs. ITO (TDS), PALAMPUR

In the result all the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 326/CHANDI/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh05 Mar 2018AY 2010-11

Bench: Ms. Diva Singh & Dr. B.R.R.Kumar

For Appellant: Shri P.N. Arora (Advocate)For Respondent: Smt. Chandrakanta
Section 201Section 201(1)

TDS). 10. That even the software has wrongly deducted the tax on interest of saving accounts and term deposit accounts having interest paid less than Rs. 10000/- in the financial year. 11. That the AO has merely relied upon the audited balance-sheet and also the observation of the Auditor and has miserably failed to collect the factual position

S.P. SINGLA CONSTRUCTION PRIVATE LIMITED,DELHI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CHANDIGARH

In the result, the appeal is allowed

ITA 514/CHANDI/2023[2012-2013]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh02 Jan 2025AY 2012-2013

Bench: SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH (Vice President), SHRI KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Ashwani Kumar, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Kusum Bansal, CIT-DR
Section 127Section 132Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 148(2)Section 153Section 153A

TDS and proof of depositing the same was enclosed at assessee's Paper Book pages 1638- 1776. The ld. Counsel for the assessee stated that there are so many sub contractors and as per the alleged documents found from the premises of the Chartered Accountant Shri Gurinder Kumar Garg, the total parties are more than 150 which include the alleged

ACIT, CIRCLE 1(1), CHANDIGARH vs. M/S SML ISUZU LTD., CHANDIGARH

ITA 644/CHANDI/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh18 Sept 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: SHRI. VIKRAM SINGH YADAV (Accountant Member), SHRI. PARESH M. JOSHI (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Rohit Jain, Advocate and Ms. Somya Jain, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Vivek Vardhan, JCIT, Sr. DR
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 253Section 3

TDS particulars was wholly unjustified. [Para 7] As regards second ground for reopening the assessment, the dividend income received during the year was claimed as exempt and the same was accepted in the assessment order passed under section 143(3). The reason for reopening the assessment was that in the absence of particulars it could not be said that

DCIT, C-1 (EXEMPTIONS), CHANDIGARH vs. THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS SOCIETY, LUDHIANA

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 52/CHANDI/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh14 May 2025AY 2017-18
For Appellant: Shri Sudhir Sehgal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Kusum Bansal, CIT DR
Section 11Section 12ASection 13(3)Section 143(3)

TDS credit of 10,16,475/-. It should be noted that the receipt from appellant\nis only Rs.2.57 cr whereas that from Balaji Studies Consultants Pvt Ltd\n64,81,750/- Institution of Mechanical Engineers (India) is Rs.2,45,27,904/- and\nICE India 2,03,42,000/-.Apparently all are related to Exams and Students. This\ncan be assumed

SWATI INDUSTRIES D-74, PHASE-V FOCAL POINT, LUDHIANA,PUNJAB vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-3, LUDHIANA , PUNJAB

In the result, the grounds of appeal of the department are dismissed and that of assessee are allowed

ITA 216/CHANDI/2024[2019-2020]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh27 Jun 2025AY 2019-2020

Bench: SHRI. RAJPAL YADAV (Vice President), SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY, AM आयकर अपील सं. / ITA No. 216/Chd/2024 निर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Year : 2019-20 Swati Industries D-74, Phase-V, Focal Point, Ludhiana, Punjab-141010 बनाम The DCIT Central Circle-3 Ludhiana, Punjab स्थायी लेखा सं./PAN NO: AADFS5870M अपीलार्थी/Appellant प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent आयकर अपील सं. / ITA No. 547/Chd/2024 निर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Year : 2019-20 बनाम The DCIT Central Circle-3 Ludhiana, Punjab स्थायी लेखा सं./PAN NO: AADFS5870

For Appellant: Shri Sudhir Sehgal, Advocate and Shri Rohit Kapoor, C.AFor Respondent: Dr. Ranjit Kaur, Addl. CIT, Sr. DR
Section 115BSection 40Section 68Section 69ASection 69C

section 115BBE. It was further argued by the ld. DR that the extrapolation for 12 months in respect of wages/salary paid to labourers have rightly been confirmed by the CIT(A). As regards, the deletion of addition on account of loose document and the cash credit in the name of Sh. Ashutosh Gupta, addition on account of commission

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE 3, LUDHIANA, LUDHIANA vs. SWATI INDUSTRIES, PUNJAB

In the result, the grounds of appeal of the department are dismissed and that of assessee are allowed

ITA 547/CHANDI/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh27 Jun 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: SHRI. RAJPAL YADAV (Vice President), SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY, AM आयकर अपील सं. / ITA No. 216/Chd/2024 निर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Year : 2019-20 Swati Industries D-74, Phase-V, Focal Point, Ludhiana, Punjab-141010 बनाम The DCIT Central Circle-3 Ludhiana, Punjab स्थायी लेखा सं./PAN NO: AADFS5870M प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent अपीलार्थी/Appellant आयकर अपील सं. / ITA No. 547/Chd/2024 निर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Year : 2019-20 बनाम The DCIT Central Circle-3 Ludhiana, Punjab स्थायी लेखा सं./PAN NO: AADFS5870

For Appellant: Shri Sudhir Sehgal, Advocate and Shri Rohit Kapoor, C.AFor Respondent: Dr. Ranjit Kaur, Addl. CIT, Sr. DR
Section 115BSection 40Section 68Section 69ASection 69C

section 115BBE. It was further argued by the ld. DR that the extrapolation for 12 months in respect of wages/salary paid to labourers have rightly been confirmed by the CIT(A). As regards, the deletion of addition on account of loose document and the cash credit in the name of Sh. Ashutosh Gupta, addition on account of commission

AMAN THUKRAL,LUDHIANA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 2(1), LUDHIANA , LUDHIANA

Accordingly, Additional Ground No. 1 is allowed for statistical

ITA 886/CHANDI/2024[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh11 Mar 2026AY 2021-22

Bench: SHRI. LALIET KUMAR (Judicial Member), SHRI. KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Sh. Pankaj Bhalla, CAFor Respondent: Sh. Manav Mangal, CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 144BSection 250(6)Section 69C

TDS details in support of the commission payments. The identity of the payees and the fact 886-CHD-2024 29 that payments were made through banking channels after deduction of tax at source are not in dispute. Further, the corresponding sales generated through the agents have also been accepted by the department, and the books of account of the assessee