BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

75 results for “condonation of delay”+ Disallowanceclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,988Chennai1,943Kolkata1,246Delhi1,168Bangalore706Pune516Hyderabad463Ahmedabad441Jaipur315Surat191Cochin183Chandigarh174Nagpur165Indore154Lucknow150Cuttack142Amritsar136Visakhapatnam132Raipur119Panaji94Rajkot83Calcutta75Patna52Agra32Jodhpur30Karnataka23Guwahati22Dehradun14Varanasi14Jabalpur13Ranchi12Allahabad12SC12Telangana10Kerala2Andhra Pradesh2Rajasthan1Himachal Pradesh1Orissa1

Key Topics

Section 260A41Disallowance31Addition to Income21Condonation of Delay14Section 14A13Section 6812Section 143(3)11Limitation/Time-bar10Long Term Capital Gains

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1, KOLKATA vs. M/S. BEEKAY STEEL INDUSTRIES LIMITED

In the result the appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed and

ITAT/177/2021HC Calcutta25 Jan 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

Section 260ASection 263Section 43B

condonation of delay is allowed and disposed of. ITAT 177 of 2021 This appeal by the revenue filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) is directed against the order dated 20th November, 2018 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal “C” Bench, Kolkata (Tribunal) in ITA/954/Kol/2017 for the assessment year 2012-13. The revenue

PRINCIPAL COMM OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL , KOLKATA 2 vs. M/S HOOGLY MILLS CO LTD

The appeal stands disposed of on the ground of low tax

ITAT/10/2018

Showing 1–20 of 75 · Page 1 of 4

9
Section 2638
Section 80I8
Section 43B8
HC Calcutta
14 Feb 2022

Bench: : The Hon’Ble Justice T.S. Sivagnanam

Section 14ASection 260A

condonation of delay is allowed. Re.: ITAT No.10 of 2018 This appeal filed by the revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act, for brevity) is directed against the order dated 2nd June, 2017 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘B’ Bench, Kolkata in ITA No. 423/Kol/2014 for the assessment year 2009-10. The revenue

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1, KOLKATA vs. M/S. DUNLOP INDIA LTD

ITAT/170/2021HC Calcutta25 Jan 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

For Appellant: Mr. P. B. Bhowmik, AdvFor Respondent: None appears
Section 260A

delay in filing this appeal is condoned. The application, IA NO.GA/1/2021 stands disposed of accordingly. RE: ITAT/170/2021 This appeal by the revenue filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, (the Act, in brevity) is directed against the order dated 31.7.2019 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C” Bench, Kolkata (Tribunal) in ITA Nos.621

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 9 KOLKATA vs. M/S STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA EMPLOYEES CO OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LTD

In the result, the appeals filed by the revenue are dismissed and the

ITAT/62/2023HC Calcutta10 Apr 2023

Bench: : The Hon’Ble Acting Chief Justice T.S. Sivagnanam & The Hon’Ble Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya Date : 10Th April, 2023 Appearance : Ms. Smita Das De, Adv. …For The Appellant Mr. Saumya Kejriwal, Adv. Mr. G.S. Gupta, Adv. …For The Respondent The Court : We Have Heard Ms. Smita Das De, Learned Standing Counsel For The Appellant & Mr. Saumya Kejriwal, Learned Counsel For The Respondent. There Is A Delay Of 168 Days In Filing These Appeals.

Section 14ASection 260A

Delay in filing the appeal is condoned. These appeals have been filed by the revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) challenging the common order dated 18th April, 2022 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, `B’ Bench, Kolkata in I.T.A No. 426 to 428/Kol/2020 and 268 to 269/Kol/2021 for the assessment year

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 9 KOLKATA vs. M/S STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA EMPLOYEES CO OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LTD

In the result, the appeals filed by the revenue are dismissed and the

ITAT/63/2023HC Calcutta10 Apr 2023

Bench: : The Hon’Ble Acting Chief Justice T.S. Sivagnanam & The Hon’Ble Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya Date : 10Th April, 2023 Appearance : Ms. Smita Das De, Adv. …For The Appellant Mr. Saumya Kejriwal, Adv. Mr. G.S. Gupta, Adv. …For The Respondent The Court : We Have Heard Ms. Smita Das De, Learned Standing Counsel For The Appellant & Mr. Saumya Kejriwal, Learned Counsel For The Respondent. There Is A Delay Of 168 Days In Filing These Appeals.

Section 14ASection 260A

Delay in filing the appeal is condoned. These appeals have been filed by the revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) challenging the common order dated 18th April, 2022 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, `B’ Bench, Kolkata in I.T.A No. 426 to 428/Kol/2020 and 268 to 269/Kol/2021 for the assessment year

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 5 KOLKATA vs. SHYAM KUMAR AND SONS HUF

ITAT/162/2022HC Calcutta26 Sept 2022

Bench: :

Section 260A

condonation of delay is allowed. ITAT/162/2022 This appeal by the revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act, for brevity) is directed against the order dated 26th June, 2019 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal “SMC” Bench, Kolkata (Tribunal) in ITA No. 1052 (Kol)/2019 for the assessment year 2015-2016. The revenue has raised

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 5,KOLKATA vs. SHRI RAJENDRA KUMAR HIRAWAT

The appeal is allowed and the

ITAT/101/2022HC Calcutta05 Aug 2022

Bench: : The Hon’Ble Justice T.S. Sivagnanam & The Hon’Ble Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya Date : August 05, 2022. Appearance :- Mr. Tilak Mitra, Adv. ….For Appellant.

Section 260A

condonation of delay being GA 1 of 2022 stands allowed. This appeal filed by the revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act, for brevity) is directed against the order dated 2 26th June, 2019 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal “SMC” Bench, Kolkata in I.T.A No.2628/Kol/2018 (Tribunal) for the assessment year

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 5,KOLKATA vs. ASHOK KUMAR REDH HUF

The appeal is allowed and the

ITAT/100/2022HC Calcutta05 Aug 2022

Bench: : The Hon’Ble Justice T.S. Sivagnanam & The Hon’Ble Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya Date : August 05, 2022. Appearance :- Mr. Tilak Mitra, Adv. ….For Appellant.

Section 260A

condonation of delay being GA 1 of 2022 stands allowed. This appeal filed by the revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act, for brevity) is directed against the order dated 26th June, 2019 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal “SMC” Bench, Kolkata in I.T.A No.2331 and (Kol) of 2018 (Tribunal) for the assessment year

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 5,KOLKATA vs. AMIT KUMAR JAIN

ITAT/113/2022HC Calcutta26 Sept 2022

Bench: :

Section 10(38)Section 143(3)Section 260ASection 68Section 69C

condonation of delay is allowed. ITAT/113/2022 This appeal by the revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act, for brevity) is directed against the order dated 28th February, 2019 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal “SMC” Bench, Kolkata (Tribunal) in ITA No. 2232/Kol/2018 for the assessment year 2014-2015. The revenue has raised the following

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1 KOLKATA vs. M/S EXIDE INDUSTRIES LTD

ITAT/45/2021HC Calcutta14 Feb 2022

Bench: : The Hon’Ble Justice T.S. Sivagnanam A N D The Hon’Ble Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya Date : February 14, 2022. [Via Video Conference] Appearance : Mr. S.N. Dutta, Adv. … For The Appellant Mr. Abhratosh Majumdar, Sr. Adv. Ms. Nilanjana Banerjee Pal, Adv. … For The Respondent The Court : We Have Heard Mr. S.N. Dutta, Learned Standing Counsel Appearing For The Appellant/Revenue & Mr. Abhratosh Majumdar, Learned Senior Counsel, Duly Assisted By Ms. Nilanjana Banerjee Pal, Learned Counsel For The Respondent/Assessee.

Section 143(3)Section 254

condone delay application sworn in by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Kolkata. To say the least there is absolutely no explanation for the inordinate delay. As pointed out by the learned senior counsel for the respondent, order passed by the Tribunal has been given effect to by the assessing officer by passing an order dated 08.03.2019 under Section 254/144C

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 2 KOLKATA vs. M/S KESORAM INDUSTRIES LTD

ITAT/232/2022HC Calcutta05 Dec 2022

Bench: : The Hon’Ble Justice T.S. Sivagnanam

Section 260ASection 37

condonation of delay being IA No.GA/1/2022 is allowed. This appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act, for brevity) is against the order dated 21st October, 2020 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘Virtual Court-A’ Bench, Kolkata (Tribunal) in ITA Nos.1195 & 1776/Kol/2019 for the assessment year 2011-12. The revenue has raised

MA/S SKYSCRAPER PROJECTS PVT LTD. vs. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-10(2), KOLKATA

ITAT/141/2025HC Calcutta28 Jul 2025

Bench: THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE T.S SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE CHAITALI CHATTERJEE (DAS)

For Appellant: Mr. Anil Kumar Dugar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Mr. Prithu Dudhoria, Advocate
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 260ASection 43B

condone delay application, GA 1 of 2025, is allowed. The issue involved in the instant case is whether the learned Tribunal was justified in setting aside the order passed by the Appellate authority namely, Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal - 4), Kolkata [CIT(A)] and remanding the matter to the Assessing Officer to consider whether addition is required to be made

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ASANSOL vs. M/S MAA LILORI ISPAT PVT LTD

ITAT/154/2023HC Calcutta17 Jul 2023

Bench: : The Hon’Ble Chief Justice T.S. Sivagnanam & The Hon’Ble Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya Date : 17Th July, 2023 Appearance : Mr. Prithu Dudhoria, Adv. … For The Appellant The Court : This Appeal Filed By The Revenue Under Section 260A Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (The Act) Is Directed Against The Order Dated January 5, 021, Passed By The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, `A’ Bench, Kolkata (Tribunal) In Ita No.1156/Kol./2019, For The Assessment Year 2013-14. The Revenue Has Raised The Following Substantial Questions Of Law For Consideration : A) Whether On The Facts & In The Circumstances Of The Case The Learned Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Has Erred In Law In

Section 260A

condonation of delay is allowed. As could be seen from the order passed by the learned Tribunal, there were four grounds, the first of which is with regard to the division of disallowance

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1,KOLKATA vs. M/S. TCG URBAN INFRASTRUCTURE HOLDINGS PVT LTD

Accordingly, the application for condonation of delay is dismissed

ITAT/127/2024HC Calcutta15 May 2024

Bench: : The Hon'Ble The Chief Justice T.S Sivagnanam -A N D- Hon'Ble Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya Date : 15Th May, 2024. Appearance : Mr. Tilak Mitra, Adv. Mr. Prithu Dudhoria, Adv. …For Appellant. Mr. Pratyush Jhunjhunwala, Adv. …For Respondent.

delay. At the request of the learned Advocates for the parties, we have also examined the facts of the case and the findings rendered by the learned Tribunal. 2 Considering the grounds which are urged before the Tribunal in comparison with the substantial questions of law raised in this appeal, we find there is a discrepancy in the amount

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1,KOLKATA vs. M/S. TCG URBAN INFRASTRUCTURE HOLDINGS PVT LTD

Accordingly, the application for condonation of delay is dismissed

ITAT/125/2024HC Calcutta15 May 2024

Bench: : The Hon'Ble The Chief Justice T.S Sivagnanam -A N D- Hon'Ble Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya Date : 15Th May, 2024. Appearance : Mr. Tilak Mitra, Adv. Mr. Prithu Dudhoria, Adv. …For Appellant. Mr. Pratyush Jhunjhunwala, Adv. …For Respondent.

delay. At the request of the learned Advocates for the parties, we have also examined the facts of the case and the findings rendered by the learned Tribunal. 2 Considering the grounds which are urged before the Tribunal in comparison with the substantial questions of law raised in this appeal, we find there is a discrepancy in the amount

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL 2 KOLKATA vs. SRI RAHUL SARAF

The appeal stands disposed of on the ground of low tax effect

ITAT/218/2024HC Calcutta20 Sept 2024

Bench: : The Hon'Ble The Chief Justice T.S Sivagnanam -A N D- Hon'Ble Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya Date : September 20, 2024. Appearance : Mr. Soumen Bhattacharjee, Adv. Ms. Doyel Dey, Adv. …For Appellant. Mr. Soumitra Chowdhury, Adv. Mr. Avra Mazumder, Adv. Mr. Pranabesh Sarkar, Adv. Mr. Suman Bhowmik, Adv. Mr. Samrat Das, Adv. Ms. Elina Dey, Adv. Mr. Sourendra Nath Banerjee, Adv. …For Respondent

Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 260ASection 54F

condonation of delay is allowed. This appeal has been filed by the revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) challenging the order dated 9th August, 2023 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” Bench Kolkata in ITA (S.S.) A. No.:117/Kol/2022 for the assessment year 2009-10. 2 The revenue has raised the following

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL -2, KOLKATA vs. M/S. HIMADRI SPECIALITY CHEMICALS LTD

ITAT/170/2022HC Calcutta31 Oct 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

Section 10BSection 115JSection 260ASection 263

condonation of delay (IA No.GA/1/2022) is allowed. This appeal filed by the revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the ‘Act’ for brevity) is directed against the order dated 3rd January, 2020 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” Bench, Kolkata (the Tribunal) in ITA No.1351/Kol/2019 for the assessment year 2012-13. The revenue

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -1, KOLKATA vs. THE JUTE CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD

Accordingly, the appeal fails and is hereby dismissed

ITAT/355/2017HC Calcutta08 Jun 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

Section 260A

condonation of delay (IA No.GA/1/2017) stands allowed. Re : ITAT/355/2017 This appeal filed by the revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the ‘Act’ for brevity) is directed against the order dated 25th May, 2016 , 2014 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A” Bench, Kolkata in ITA No.1348/Kol/2013 for the assessment year 2008-09. The revenue

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 1,KOLKATA vs. NISSIN ABC LOGISTICS P LTD

Accordingly, the appeal fails and dismissed

ITAT/185/2022HC Calcutta15 Nov 2022

Bench: : The Hon’Ble Justice T.S. Sivagnanam & The Hon’Ble Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya Dated : November 15, 2022. Appearance: Mr. Tilak Mitra, Adv. …For Appellant Mr. J. P. Khaitan, Sr. Adv. Mr. A. Gupta, Adv. Mr. I. Banerjee, Adv. …For Respondent Ga/1/2022 The Court :- We Have Heard Mr. Tilak Mitra, Learned Standing Counsel For The Appellant & Mr. J. P. Khaitan, Learned Senior Counsel For The Respondent. There Is A Delay Of 210 Days In Filing This Appeal. We Have Perused The Affidavit Filed In Support Of The Petition & Found Sufficient Cause Has Been Shown For Condonation Of Delay. Accordingly, The Application Is Allowed & The Delay In Filing The Appeal Is Condoned.

Section 260ASection 40Section 9(1)(i)Section 9(1)(vii)

delay in filing the appeal is condoned. ITAT/185/2022 This appeal filed by the revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) is directed against the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal “B” Bench Kolkata dated 10th August, 2021 in ITA No. 473Kol/2020 for the assessment year 2 2014-15. The revenue has raised

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-12,KOLKATA vs. M/S.SOORAJMULL NAGARMULL

In the result, the appeal is dismissed and the substantial questions of

ITAT/46/2020HC Calcutta23 Nov 2022

Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

Section 148Section 260ASection 41Section 41(1)

condoned the delay in filing the appeal. GA No. 01 of 2020 is allowed. 3. This appeal filed by the revenue under Section 260A of the Act is directed against the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal “B” Bench Kolkata (Tribunal), dated 20.07.2018 in ITA No. 1907/Kol/2016 for the assessment year 2001-2002. ITAT