ACIT, HUBLI vs. SHRI. MALLANAGOUDA S. SANKAGOUDASHANI, HUBLI
In the result the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed and the revenue’s appeal is dismissed
ITA 291/BANG/2014[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore28 Apr 2017AY 2007-08
Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri S. Jayaramanassessment Year: 2007-08 Shri Mallanagouda S. Sankagoudashani, No.222, 2Nd Floor, The Deputy Commissioner Of Bhavani Arcade, Income Tax, Vs. Near Basav Vana, N.C.M., Circle 1(1), Hubli – 580 029. Hubli.
For Appellant: Shri Ashok Kulkarni, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri G. Kamaladhar, Standing Counsel
Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 147Section 148
reassessment is not sustainable. At the outset, we
note that though the assessee has relied upon the decision of Hon’ble
Bombay High court in case of CIT Vs Jet Airways (I) Ltd. (supra)
however the Hon’ble jurisdictional High Court in case of N.
Govindaraju Vs ITO (supra) while dealing with an identical issue has
held in para