GOPAL S. PANDITH vs. DCIT,
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal held that Section 153D does not mandate an opportunity of hearing for the assessee before the Joint Commissioner approves an assessment order under Section 153A. It also directed verification of deposit dates for family members' accounts.
What were the facts?
The assessee challenged assessment orders under Section 153A, primarily on the grounds of lack of opportunity for hearing before approval and the classification of agricultural land sale income. The tribunal also considered issues related to Pooja income, mutual fund losses, and deposits in family members' names.
What were the issues?
Whether an opportunity of hearing is required before approval of an assessment order under Section 153A, and the correct classification of income from agricultural land sale.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 153A,Section 153D,Section 143(3),Section 10(35),Section 54B,Section 139,Section 234B
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Anil Kumar Bhatia537 citing352 ITR 493 · 2013 · HC · Read judgment
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, BANGALORE BENCH “ B ”
Before: SHRI A.K. GARODIA & SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO
Per Shri Vijay Pal Rao, J.M. : These five appeals by the assessee are directed against the composite order
of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) dt.19.5.2013 arising from Assessment
Order passed under Section 153 r.w.s. 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short 'the Act') from 20.5.2006 to A.Y. 2009-10 respectively.
First we take up the appeal for Assessment Year 2005-06 wherein the assessee has raised the following grounds :
The learned Commissioner of income Tax (appeals) erred in holding that non issue of an opportunity of being heard
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 153A
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Ashok Singh, Jaipur vs ACIT, Circle-2 Jaipur, JaipurITA 1540/JPR/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Ig3 Infra Limited, KanchipuramITA 2578/CHNY/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Ig3 Infra Limited, OggiamthoraipakkaITA 2577/CHNY/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Shanmugham Thiagarajan, ChennaiITA 2576/CHNY/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sanjay Maheshwari vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Iyyanan Eswaran vs. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (St) (GST)Madras · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Dc Security Services vs. Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shreekanth Enterprises vs. Joint Commissioner AppealsUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- Sharad Ashok Agarwal vs. State Of Maharashtra Through G.P. And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026