DAWALSAHEB BABUSAHEB SULTANBHAI,DHARWAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(1), HUBLI
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed "
ITA 1181/BANG/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore24 Jul 2024AY 2017-18
Bench: Shri George George K & Shri Waseem Ahmedr Assessment Year : 2017-18 Shri. Dawalsaheb Babusaheb Sultanbhai, Vs. Ito, 1A, Mehaboobnagar, Ward – 1(1), Dharwad – 580 008. Hubli. Pan : Aqzps 4249 L Appellant Respondent Assessee By : None Revenue By : Shri. Ganesh R. Gale, Standing Counsel For Department Date Of Hearing : 23.07.2024 Date Of Pronouncement : 24.07.2024
For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri. Ganesh R. Gale, Standing Counsel for Department
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 250Section 271Section 271BSection 273BSection 274Section 44A
271 B of the Act for default u/s 44AB. The penalty is confirmed and all the grounds are dismissed.”
6. Aggrieved by the Order of the CIT(A) confirming the imposition of penalty under section 271B of the Act, assessee has preferred the present appeal before the Tribunal. Assessee had filed a letter dated 22.07.2024 requesting for an adjournment