BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

1,119 results for “disallowance”+ Section 142clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai4,229Delhi3,003Kolkata1,192Bangalore1,119Chennai801Ahmedabad745Jaipur728Hyderabad648Pune604Indore415Chandigarh409Visakhapatnam376Surat352Rajkot254Cochin228Raipur167Cuttack139Amritsar135Agra134Lucknow118Nagpur106Guwahati89Jodhpur72Allahabad72Patna71Ranchi59Karnataka55Calcutta52Panaji51Telangana32Jabalpur25SC22Dehradun19Varanasi16Punjab & Haryana6Kerala5Orissa4Rajasthan2Uttarakhand2Andhra Pradesh1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1Tripura1H.L. DATTU S.A. BOBDE1Bombay1Himachal Pradesh1

Key Topics

Addition to Income60Section 143(3)54Disallowance52Section 80P(2)(a)48Deduction47Section 143(1)40Section 143(2)31Section 25030Section 80P28

M/S. BHARAT BEEDI WORKS PRIVATE LIMITED ,MANGALURU vs. ASSISTANT COMMISIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - 2(1) , MANGALURU

ITA 642/BANG/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore21 Apr 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu\Nand\Nshri Soundararajan K.\Nita Nos.642 To 645/Bang/2024\N Assessment Years : 2017-18 To\N2020-21\Nm/S. Bharat Beedi Works\Nprivate Limited,\Ngolden Jubilee Building,\Nbharath Bagh,\Nkadri Road,\Nmangaluru – 575 002.\Npan: Aaacb9001B\Nappellant\Nassessee By\Nrevenue By\N: Shri Chythanya .K, Sr.\Nadvocate\N: Shri E. Shridhar, Cit-Dr\Ndate Of Hearing\Ndate Of Pronouncement\Norder\Nper Bench\Nthese Are The Appeals Filed By The Assessee Challenging The Orders Of\Nthe Ld.Cit(A) -2, Panaji Dated 30/01/2024 In Respect Of The A.Ys.2017-18,\N2018-19, 2019-20 & 2020-21. The Grounds Raised By The Assessee For\Neach Of The Assessment Years Are Extracted Hereunder For The Sack Of\Nconvenience.\Npage 2 Of 74\Nita Nos.642 To 645/Bang/2024\N Assessment Year 2017-18:\N“1. The Impugned Orders Of The Lower Authorities Are Not\Njustified In Law & On The Facts & Circumstances Of The\Ncase.\N2. The Impugned Assessment Proceedings & The\Nimpugned Assessment Order Under Section 143(3) Dated\N29.11.2021 Are Bad & Non-Est Since The Notice Under\Nsection 143(2) Dated 13.08.2018 Was Issued Without\Naffixing Any Signature Either Manually Or Digitally.\N3. Without Prejudice To The Above, Impugned Assessment\Nproceedings & The Impugned Assessment Order Under\Nsection 143(3) Dated 29.11.2021 Are Bad & Non-Est\Nbeing Based On The Notice Under Section 143(2) Dated\N13.08.2018 Which Is Vague, Without Of Application Of Mind\Nand Contrary To Section 143(2) & Applicable Board\Ncirculars & Instructions.\N4. As Regards Disallowance Under Section 14A U/S Rule\N8D(2)(Ii):\N4.

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 14A

disallowance under Section 14A can be made\ntowards the interest expenditure where the Appellant's\ninterest-free funds exceed its interest-free investments.\nFor the above Grounds and for such other Grounds which\nmay be allowed by the Honourable Members to be urged\nat the time of hearing, it is prayed that the aforesaid\nappeal be allowed.”\n Assessment Year

Showing 1–20 of 1,119 · Page 1 of 56

...
Section 10A28
Section 142(1)26
Natural Justice25

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3(1)(1), BENGALURU, BENGALURU vs. INFOSYS LIMITED, BENGALURU

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed and the appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed

ITA 245/BANG/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore06 Aug 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Keshav Dubeyassessment Year: 2019-20

For Appellant: Sri Padam Chand Khincha – CAFor Respondent: Smt. Srinandini Das – CIT - DR
Section 1Section 10ASection 155Section 250

disallowance made under section 10AA of the Act ignoring that since no new master service agreement was made, the benefit of claim u/s 10AA from the old SEZ cannot be allowed. 5. The CIT(A) erred in remitting the matter to assessing officer on issue relating to section 80G of the Act ignoring that in instant case assessee

M/S. BRIGADE ENTERPRISES LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 2(3), BANGALORE

In the result appeal filed by assessee stands partly allowed

ITA 2364/BANG/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore11 Oct 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillaiassessment Year : 2013-14 M/S. Brigade Enterprises Ltd., 26/1, 30Th Floor Wtc, The Dy. Commissioner Of Dr. Rajkumar Road, Income-Tax, Malleshwaram, Circle-2(3), Rajajinagar, Bengaluru. Vs. Bengaluru-560 100. Pan – Aaacb 7459 F Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri P.C Kincha, C.A Revenue By : Ms. Neera Malhotra, Cit(Dr) Date Of Hearing : 20-07-2021 Date Of Pronouncement : 11-10-2021 Order Per Beena Pillaipresent Appeal Has Been Filed By Assessee Against Order Dated 30/08/2019 Passed By The Ld.Cit(A)-11, Bangalore For Assessment Year 2013-14 On Following Grounds Of Appeal: “1. General Ground 1.1. The Order Passed By The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) ["Cit(A) For Short Hereinafter"] To The Extent Prejudicial To The Appellant Is Bad In Law & Liable To Be Quashed. 2. Disallowance Under Section 14A R.W. Rule 8D 2.1. The Learned Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Central Circle - 2(3), Bangalore ["Ao" For Short Hereinafter] Has Erred In Making A Disallowance Of Rs. 2,02,22,837/- Under Se Tion 14A Comprising Of Disallowa,,Ø-1S. 1,73,98,969/- Under Rule 8D(2)(Ii) & Rs. 28,23,868/- Under Rule 8D(2)(Iii) & The Learned Cit(A) Has Erred In Confirming The Said Disallowance.

For Appellant: Shri P.C Kincha, C.AFor Respondent: Ms. Neera Malhotra, CIT(DR)
Section 14ASection 35DSection 36Section 36(1)(iii)Section 80

Disallowance of deduction under section 80-lB amounting to Rs. 8,07.80,427 be deleted.” Brief facts of the case are as under: 2. The assessee is a company and filed its return of income for year under consideration declaring total income of Rs.1,45,82,610/-. Book profit for the year was shown at Rs.59,89,64,843/-. Ld.AO

M/S. GOLDMAN SACHS SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, SPECIAL RANGE-3, BANGALORE

In the result, the assessee's appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2355/BANG/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore15 Jun 2020AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri A.K. Garodia & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadaleit(Tp)A No.2355/Bang/2019 (Assessment Year: 2015-16) M/S. Goldman Sachs Services Pvt. Ltd., Wing A, B & C, Helios Business Park, 150, Orr, Kadubeesanahalli, Bangalore-560103 ….Appellant Pan Aaccg 2435N Vs. Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax, Special Range 3, Bangalore. ……Respondent.

For Appellant: Shri Sharath Rao, C.AFor Respondent: Ms. Neera Malhotra, CIT (D.R)
Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 144C(5)Section 92CSection 92C(3)

disallow the claim under section 80G of the Act, in respect of CSR contributions. 6.4 The Honorable DRP and the learned AO have erred in law by disregarding the fact that the deductions claimed under section 80G of the Act pertained to eligible payments specified under section 80G of the Act. 6.5 The Honorable DRP and the learned AO have

M/S UKN PROPERTIES PVT. LTD.,,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,, BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is treated as allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2012/BANG/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore02 Jul 2021AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan & Shri B.R. Baskaranassessment Year: 2011-12

For Appellant: Shri Narendra Sharma, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Kannan Narayanan, D.R
Section 10Section 14ASection 40

142 ITD 49 (Mum) as well as the decision of the Delhi Bench of ITAT in the case of SMS Demang (P.) Ltd. V DCIT (2010) 38 SOT 496. The learned Authorised Representative has contended that the issue of disallowance of depreciation by applying the provisions of section

M/S. SYNGENE INTERNATIONAL LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, SPECIAL RANGE- 6, BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 147/BANG/2020[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore13 Jun 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Shri George George K.Assessment Year: 2010-11

For Appellant: Sri Padamchand Khincha, A.RFor Respondent: Sri Sumer Singh Meena, DR
Section 10ASection 10BSection 14ASection 250Section 32(1)(iia)Section 80

section 142(1) dated 30.1.2013, the Assessee was asked to show cause as to why disallowance under section 14A read

THE UNITED THEOLOGICAL COLLEGE,BANGALORE vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, (EXEMPTIONS), WARD-2, BENGALURU

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 518/BANG/2023[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore01 Dec 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillaiassessment Year: 2010-11

For Appellant: Shri Joseph Vargese, A.RFor Respondent: Shri D.S. Karthik, D.R
Section 11(5)Section 147Section 148Section 250

disallowance. The assessee being aggrieved by the said assessment order passed under section 147 r.w.s 143(3) of the Act dated 30.11.2017 served on the assessee on 28.12.2017 preferred an appeal before the learned Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) on 25.01.2018. The learned Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) issued hearing notices under section 250 of the Act dated

SRI. KALABHAIRAWESHWARA MULTI-PURPOSE CO-OP SOCIETY LTD., ,CHIKKAMAGALURU vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, , CHIKKAMAGALURU

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 1344/BANG/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore17 Oct 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri George George K & Ms. Padmavathi. Sr Assessment Year : 2018-19 Sri Kalabhairaveshwara Multi-Purpose Co- Vs. Ito, Operative Society Ltd., Ward Officer, K. M. Road,Chikmagalur District Office Ward – 1, S. O. 577 101, Karnataka. Chikmagaluru. Pan : Aapas 3058 L Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri. Mahesh R. Uppin, Advocate Revenue By : Ms. Neha Sahay, Jcit(Dr)(Itat), Bengaluru. Date Of Hearing : 16.10.2024 Date Of Pronouncement : 17.10.2024

For Appellant: Shri. Mahesh R. Uppin, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms. Neha Sahay, JCIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru
Section 139(1)Section 143Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 80ASection 80A(5)Section 80P

disallowance of deduction claimed u/s. 80P of the Act by virtue of provision contained in Sec. 80AC of the Act was left out to be pleaded in the grounds of appeal before the First Appellate Authority due to oversight. The belated filing of ITR will not disentitle the appellant from claiming the benefit u/s. 80P of the Act as held

CHIKKAMUDNOOR MILK PRODUCERS CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED, ,CHIKKAMUDNOOR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1 , PUTTUR

In the result appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 104/BANG/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore22 Dec 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishiassessment Year : 2019-20

For Appellant: Shri Krishna Kantila, CAFor Respondent: Shri Ganesh R. Ghale, Advocate, Standing Counsel
Section 139Section 139(1)Section 143Section 154Section 80Section 80ASection 80PSection 80p

section 142, such return shall be processed in the following manner, namely:— (a) the total income or loss shall be computed after making the following adjustments, namely:— (i) any arithmetical error in the return; (ii) an incorrect claim, if such incorrect claim is apparent from any information in the return; (iii) disallowance

KEDAMBADI MILK PRODUCERS CO-OPERATIVE WOMEN SOCIETY LIMITED,KEDAMBADI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1 PUTTUR, PUTTUR

In the result appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 280/BANG/2025[2019-2020]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore22 Dec 2025AY 2019-2020

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishiassessment Year : 2019-20

For Appellant: Shri Krishna Kantila, CAFor Respondent: Shri Ganesh R. Ghale, Advocate, Standing Counsel
Section 139Section 139(1)Section 143Section 154Section 80Section 80ASection 80PSection 80p

section 142, such return shall be processed in the following manner, namely:— (a) the total income or loss shall be computed after making the following adjustments, namely:— (i) any arithmetical error in the return; (ii) an incorrect claim, if such incorrect claim is apparent from any information in the return; (iii) disallowance

NEW MANGALORE PORT AUTHORITY,MANGALORE vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-1 & TPS, MANGALORE

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue on this for the Assessment Years

ITA 726/BANG/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore23 Jul 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri. Laxmi Prasad Sahu & Shri. Soundararajan K

For Appellant: Smt. Priyanka Jain and Shri. Pankaj Soni, AdvocatesFor Respondent: Shri. Kiran D, CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bangalore
Section 142(1)Section 14ASection 80I

Disallowance of interest on reserve fund Revenue’s Appeal 6. 482/Bang/2025 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2024- U/s 80IA(4)(1) of 3,91,46,781/- 2015-16 25/107184756(1) the Act dated 03.01.2025 7. 483/Bang/2025 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2024- -do- 6,34,12,432/- 2016-17 25/1071842164(1) dated 03.01.2025 8. 484/Bang/2025 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2024- -do- 3,15,40,795/- 2017-18 25/1071843769(1) dated 03.01.2025 9. 485/Bang/2025 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2024-

NEW MANGALORE PORT AUTHORITY,MANGALORE vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-1 & TPS, MANGALURU

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue on this for the Assessment Years

ITA 724/BANG/2025[201617]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore23 Jul 2025

Bench: Shri. Laxmi Prasad Sahu & Shri. Soundararajan K

For Appellant: Smt. Priyanka Jain and Shri. Pankaj Soni, AdvocatesFor Respondent: Shri. Kiran D, CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bangalore
Section 142(1)Section 14ASection 80I

Disallowance of interest on reserve fund Revenue’s Appeal 6. 482/Bang/2025 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2024- U/s 80IA(4)(1) of 3,91,46,781/- 2015-16 25/107184756(1) the Act dated 03.01.2025 7. 483/Bang/2025 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2024- -do- 6,34,12,432/- 2016-17 25/1071842164(1) dated 03.01.2025 8. 484/Bang/2025 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2024- -do- 3,15,40,795/- 2017-18 25/1071843769(1) dated 03.01.2025 9. 485/Bang/2025 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2024-

DCIT, CIRCLE-1(1), MANGALURU vs. NEW MANGALORE PORT AUTHORITY, MANGALURU

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue on this for the Assessment Years

ITA 482/BANG/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore23 Jul 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri. Laxmi Prasad Sahu & Shri. Soundararajan K

For Appellant: Smt. Priyanka Jain and Shri. Pankaj Soni, AdvocatesFor Respondent: Shri. Kiran D, CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bangalore
Section 142(1)Section 14ASection 80I

Disallowance of interest on reserve fund Revenue’s Appeal 6. 482/Bang/2025 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2024- U/s 80IA(4)(1) of 3,91,46,781/- 2015-16 25/107184756(1) the Act dated 03.01.2025 7. 483/Bang/2025 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2024- -do- 6,34,12,432/- 2016-17 25/1071842164(1) dated 03.01.2025 8. 484/Bang/2025 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2024- -do- 3,15,40,795/- 2017-18 25/1071843769(1) dated 03.01.2025 9. 485/Bang/2025 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2024-

NEW MANGALORE PORT AUTHORITY,MANGALORE vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-1 & TPS, MANGALORE

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue on this for the Assessment Years

ITA 727/BANG/2025[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore23 Jul 2025AY 2022-23

Bench: Shri. Laxmi Prasad Sahu & Shri. Soundararajan K

For Appellant: Smt. Priyanka Jain and Shri. Pankaj Soni, AdvocatesFor Respondent: Shri. Kiran D, CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bangalore
Section 142(1)Section 14ASection 80I

Disallowance of interest on reserve fund Revenue’s Appeal 6. 482/Bang/2025 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2024- U/s 80IA(4)(1) of 3,91,46,781/- 2015-16 25/107184756(1) the Act dated 03.01.2025 7. 483/Bang/2025 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2024- -do- 6,34,12,432/- 2016-17 25/1071842164(1) dated 03.01.2025 8. 484/Bang/2025 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2024- -do- 3,15,40,795/- 2017-18 25/1071843769(1) dated 03.01.2025 9. 485/Bang/2025 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2024-

DCIT, CIRCLE 1(1) & TPS, MANGALURU vs. NEW MANGALORE PORT AUTHORITY, MANGALURU

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue on this for the Assessment Years

ITA 483/BANG/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore23 Jul 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri. Laxmi Prasad Sahu & Shri. Soundararajan K

For Appellant: Smt. Priyanka Jain and Shri. Pankaj Soni, AdvocatesFor Respondent: Shri. Kiran D, CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bangalore
Section 142(1)Section 14ASection 80I

Disallowance of interest on reserve fund Revenue’s Appeal 6. 482/Bang/2025 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2024- U/s 80IA(4)(1) of 3,91,46,781/- 2015-16 25/107184756(1) the Act dated 03.01.2025 7. 483/Bang/2025 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2024- -do- 6,34,12,432/- 2016-17 25/1071842164(1) dated 03.01.2025 8. 484/Bang/2025 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2024- -do- 3,15,40,795/- 2017-18 25/1071843769(1) dated 03.01.2025 9. 485/Bang/2025 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2024-

DCIT, CIRCLE 1(1) & TPS, MANGALURU vs. NEW MANGALORE PORT AUTHORITY, MANGALURU

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue on this for the Assessment Years

ITA 485/BANG/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore23 Jul 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri. Laxmi Prasad Sahu & Shri. Soundararajan K

For Appellant: Smt. Priyanka Jain and Shri. Pankaj Soni, AdvocatesFor Respondent: Shri. Kiran D, CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bangalore
Section 142(1)Section 14ASection 80I

Disallowance of interest on reserve fund Revenue’s Appeal 6. 482/Bang/2025 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2024- U/s 80IA(4)(1) of 3,91,46,781/- 2015-16 25/107184756(1) the Act dated 03.01.2025 7. 483/Bang/2025 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2024- -do- 6,34,12,432/- 2016-17 25/1071842164(1) dated 03.01.2025 8. 484/Bang/2025 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2024- -do- 3,15,40,795/- 2017-18 25/1071843769(1) dated 03.01.2025 9. 485/Bang/2025 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2024-

NEW MANGALORE PORT AUTHORITY,MANGALORE vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-1 & TPS, MANGALORE

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue on this for the Assessment Years

ITA 723/BANG/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore23 Jul 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri. Laxmi Prasad Sahu & Shri. Soundararajan K

For Appellant: Smt. Priyanka Jain and Shri. Pankaj Soni, AdvocatesFor Respondent: Shri. Kiran D, CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bangalore
Section 142(1)Section 14ASection 80I

Disallowance of interest on reserve fund Revenue’s Appeal 6. 482/Bang/2025 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2024- U/s 80IA(4)(1) of 3,91,46,781/- 2015-16 25/107184756(1) the Act dated 03.01.2025 7. 483/Bang/2025 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2024- -do- 6,34,12,432/- 2016-17 25/1071842164(1) dated 03.01.2025 8. 484/Bang/2025 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2024- -do- 3,15,40,795/- 2017-18 25/1071843769(1) dated 03.01.2025 9. 485/Bang/2025 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2024-

DCIT, CIRCLE 1(1) & TPS, MANGALURU vs. NEW MANGALORE PORT AUTHORITY, MANGALURU

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue on this for the Assessment Years

ITA 486/BANG/2025[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore23 Jul 2025AY 2022-23

Bench: Shri. Laxmi Prasad Sahu & Shri. Soundararajan K

For Appellant: Smt. Priyanka Jain and Shri. Pankaj Soni, AdvocatesFor Respondent: Shri. Kiran D, CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bangalore
Section 142(1)Section 14ASection 80I

Disallowance of interest on reserve fund Revenue’s Appeal 6. 482/Bang/2025 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2024- U/s 80IA(4)(1) of 3,91,46,781/- 2015-16 25/107184756(1) the Act dated 03.01.2025 7. 483/Bang/2025 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2024- -do- 6,34,12,432/- 2016-17 25/1071842164(1) dated 03.01.2025 8. 484/Bang/2025 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2024- -do- 3,15,40,795/- 2017-18 25/1071843769(1) dated 03.01.2025 9. 485/Bang/2025 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2024-

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MANGALURU vs. NEW MANGALORE PORT AUTHORITY, MANGALURU

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue on this for the Assessment Years

ITA 484/BANG/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore23 Jul 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri. Laxmi Prasad Sahu & Shri. Soundararajan K

For Appellant: Smt. Priyanka Jain and Shri. Pankaj Soni, AdvocatesFor Respondent: Shri. Kiran D, CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bangalore
Section 142(1)Section 14ASection 80I

Disallowance of interest on reserve fund Revenue’s Appeal 6. 482/Bang/2025 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2024- U/s 80IA(4)(1) of 3,91,46,781/- 2015-16 25/107184756(1) the Act dated 03.01.2025 7. 483/Bang/2025 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2024- -do- 6,34,12,432/- 2016-17 25/1071842164(1) dated 03.01.2025 8. 484/Bang/2025 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2024- -do- 3,15,40,795/- 2017-18 25/1071843769(1) dated 03.01.2025 9. 485/Bang/2025 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2024-

NEW MANGALORE PORT AUTHORITY,MANGALORE vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-1 & TPS, MANGALORE

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue on this for the Assessment Years

ITA 725/BANG/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore23 Jul 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri. Laxmi Prasad Sahu & Shri. Soundararajan K

For Appellant: Smt. Priyanka Jain and Shri. Pankaj Soni, AdvocatesFor Respondent: Shri. Kiran D, CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bangalore
Section 142(1)Section 14ASection 80I

Disallowance of interest on reserve fund Revenue’s Appeal 6. 482/Bang/2025 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2024- U/s 80IA(4)(1) of 3,91,46,781/- 2015-16 25/107184756(1) the Act dated 03.01.2025 7. 483/Bang/2025 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2024- -do- 6,34,12,432/- 2016-17 25/1071842164(1) dated 03.01.2025 8. 484/Bang/2025 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2024- -do- 3,15,40,795/- 2017-18 25/1071843769(1) dated 03.01.2025 9. 485/Bang/2025 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2024-