BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

176 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 43(6)(b)clear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai557Delhi469Mumbai357Kolkata230Hyderabad226Bangalore176Jaipur170Ahmedabad161Pune147Karnataka145Chandigarh134Nagpur67Amritsar46Cuttack41Raipur39Lucknow38Indore38Calcutta37Visakhapatnam33Surat32Cochin26SC24Guwahati16Rajkot15Patna12Varanasi12Telangana10Allahabad9Dehradun5Rajasthan5Jodhpur5Panaji4Orissa4Himachal Pradesh1Jabalpur1Andhra Pradesh1Agra1Ranchi1

Key Topics

Section 234E92Section 200A48Addition to Income47Section 25046Condonation of Delay41Section 143(3)30Section 14830Disallowance29Limitation/Time-bar

M/S. RMZ HOTELS PRIVATE LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. NATIONAL E-ASSESSMENT CENTRE, DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 954/BANG/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore22 Feb 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojariassessment Year: 2018-19

For Appellant: Shri V. Srinivasan, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Ganesh R. Ghale, Standing Counsel for Department
Section 234Section 255Section 255(3)Section 36

condone the above delay and admit the appeal for adjudication. 4. The first ground for our consideration is with regard to the disallowance of Rs.99,02,829/-, which is claimed by assessee as an interest payment. The assessee in the year under consideration advanced a sum of Rs.41 crores towards purchase of shares. The AO questioned the sources of Rs.41

Showing 1–20 of 176 · Page 1 of 9

...
28
TDS27
Deduction24
Section 10A23

EQUIPMENT FABRICATORS,BENGALURU vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC, BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 386/BANG/2021[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore21 Oct 2021AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillaiassessment Year: 2018-19

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Sankar Ganesh K. Jt.CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru
Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 234ASection 234BSection 23ASection 36(1)(va)Section 43B

condone the delay of 508 days in filing the appeal and admit the appeal for adjudication. 19. Coming to the merits of the issue, the grievance of the assessee is disallowance of Rs.11,78,481 being PF & ESI contribution of employees paid beyond the due date u/s. 36(1)(va) r.w.s. 43B of the Act. It was Page

SHRI. BORAIAH SHIVANANJAIAH,BENGALURU vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE- 3(2)(1), BANGALORE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is treated as partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 680/BANG/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore11 Apr 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Smt. Beena Pillai, Jm Boraiah Shivananjaiah, Asst.Commissioner Of K. Janatha Colony, Income Tax, Bidadi Hobli, Vs. Circle - 3(2)(1) Ramnagara Dist., Bengaluru Bengaluru Pan – Anaps2762E Appellant Respondent

For Respondent: Assessee by Sri Sreehari Kutsa, Advocate
Section 143(3)Section 234ASection 250Section 36(1)(va)Section 43ASection 43B

condone the delay and admit the appeal for adjudication. Accordingly, the appeal is admitted for adjudication. 6. Now we will proceed on merits of grounds raised by the assessee. The first ground is with regard to the disallowance of Employees’ Contribution to EPF beyond due date, by invoking Section 36(1)(va) of the Act. In our opinion

SRI.INDUDHAR,DAVANGERE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, DAVANGERE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 2281/BANG/2016[2009-2010]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore22 Mar 2017AY 2009-2010

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao

For Appellant: Shri Ravi Shankar,AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri AR.V.Sreenivasan, JCIT (D.R)
Section 271(1)Section 271(1)(c)

6 under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act will be levied by the A.O. Therefore the assessee decided not to challenge the assessment order. However, when the Assessing Officer levied the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act, the assessee challenged its decision and then filed the appeal. This change of decision based on the order passed

M/S APMG INDIA CERTIFICATIONS PVT LTD,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX TDS, BENGALURU

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 3143/BANG/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore21 Jun 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Arun Kumar Garodia & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadaleassessment Year : 2013-14 M/S. Apmg India Certifications Private Limited, The Deputy Regus Business Centre, E-1, Commissioner Of Ground Floor, Beech, Manyata Income Tax, Vs. Embassy Business Park, Centralized Outer Ring Road, Nagawara, Processing Cell-Tds, Bangalore – 560 045. Ghaziabad. Pan: Aaica5537D Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri Deepak Chopra, Ca Revenue By : Shri K.N. Dhandapani, Jcit (Dr) Date Of Hearing : 12.06.2019 Date Of Pronouncement : 21.06.2019

For Appellant: Shri Deepak Chopra, CAFor Respondent: Shri K.N. Dhandapani, JCIT (DR)
Section 200ASection 234ESection 263

B” BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI ARUN KUMAR GARODIA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI PAVAN KUMAR GADALE, JUDICIAL MEMBER Assessment Year : 2013-14 M/s. APMG India Certifications Private Limited, The Deputy Regus Business Centre, E-1, Commissioner of Ground Floor, Beech, Manyata Income Tax, Vs. Embassy Business Park, Centralized Outer Ring Road, Nagawara, Processing Cell-TDS, Bangalore – 560 045. Ghaziabad. PAN: AAICA5537D

M/S. INDIANOIL SKYTAKING PRIVATE LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE- 3(1)(1), BANGALORE

In the result, the appeals are partly allowed

ITA 299/BANG/2020[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore20 May 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri George George K. & Ms. Padmavathy S

For Appellant: Shri Padamchand Khincha, CAFor Respondent: Shri Sumer Singh Meena, CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru
Section 115Section 143(3)Section 36(1)(iii)Section 37(1)Section 80Section 80I

b) of the Act. 6. The CIT(A) erred in law and on facts in not appreciating that the provisions of section 80IA of the Act were introduced to encourage private participation for development of infrastructure and therefore the provisions had to be construed liberally. 7. The CIT(A) erred in law in not following the judicial precedents relied upon

INDIANOIL SKYTANKING PRIVATE LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE- 3(1)(1), BENGALURU

In the result, the appeals are partly allowed

ITA 407/BANG/2020[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore20 May 2022AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri George George K. & Ms. Padmavathy S

For Appellant: Shri Padamchand Khincha, CAFor Respondent: Shri Sumer Singh Meena, CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru
Section 115Section 143(3)Section 36(1)(iii)Section 37(1)Section 80Section 80I

b) of the Act. 6. The CIT(A) erred in law and on facts in not appreciating that the provisions of section 80IA of the Act were introduced to encourage private participation for development of infrastructure and therefore the provisions had to be construed liberally. 7. The CIT(A) erred in law in not following the judicial precedents relied upon

M/S INDIANOIL SKYTANKING PRIVATE LIMITED ,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-3(1)(1), BANGALORE

In the result, the appeals are partly allowed

ITA 583/BANG/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore09 May 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri George George K. & Ms. Padmavathy S

For Appellant: Shri Padamchand Khincha, CAFor Respondent: Shri Sumer Singh Meena, CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru
Section 115Section 143(3)Section 36(1)(iii)Section 37(1)Section 80Section 80I

b) of the Act. 6. The CIT(A) erred in law and on facts in not appreciating that the provisions of section 80IA of the Act were introduced to encourage private participation for development of infrastructure and therefore the provisions had to be construed liberally. 7. The CIT(A) erred in law in not following the judicial precedents relied upon

M/S. TATA ELXSI LIMITED., ,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-7(1)(1), BANGALORE

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 927/BANG/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore08 Jan 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri George George K. & Shri Chandra Poojari

For Appellant: Shri Padam Chand Kincha, A.RFor Respondent: Shri D.K. Mishra, D.R
Section 10ASection 30Section 80ASection 80H

Delay condoned. 2. In all these appeals issue relates to the interpretation that is to be accorded to the provisions of Section 80HH of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act'). Section 80HH and other related provisions, as it existed at the relevant time, are to be taken note of since we are concerned with

M/S. PRAKAT SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED ,BENGALURU vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3(1)(1), BENGALURU

In the result, all the appeals by the assessee are treated as allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 554/BANG/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore27 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri George George K & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri. Ramakrishna Kamat, CAFor Respondent: Shri. Subramanian S, Addl. CIT (DR), ITAT, Bengaluru
Section 200ASection 234ESection 250

B” BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI GEORGE GEORGE K, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI LAXMI PRASAD SAHU, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA Nos.531 to 533/Bang/2023, 554 to 567/Bang/2023 Assessment Years : 2012-13 to 2014-15 M/s. Prakat Solutions Pvt. Ltd., DCIT, 147, Rainbow Residency, Off. Circle – 3(1)(1), Sarjapura Road, Vs. Bengaluru. Junnasandra Village, Carmelaram, Bengaluru – 560 035. PAN : AAFCP 3783 R APPELLANT

M/S. PRAKAT SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED,BENGALURU vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE-3(1)(1), BENGALURU

In the result, all the appeals by the assessee are treated as allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 566/BANG/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore27 Sept 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri George George K & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri. Ramakrishna Kamat, CAFor Respondent: Shri. Subramanian S, Addl. CIT (DR), ITAT, Bengaluru
Section 200ASection 234ESection 250

B” BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI GEORGE GEORGE K, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI LAXMI PRASAD SAHU, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA Nos.531 to 533/Bang/2023, 554 to 567/Bang/2023 Assessment Years : 2012-13 to 2014-15 M/s. Prakat Solutions Pvt. Ltd., DCIT, 147, Rainbow Residency, Off. Circle – 3(1)(1), Sarjapura Road, Vs. Bengaluru. Junnasandra Village, Carmelaram, Bengaluru – 560 035. PAN : AAFCP 3783 R APPELLANT

M/S. PRAKAT SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED ,BENGALURU vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE-3(1)(1), BENGALURU

In the result, all the appeals by the assessee are treated as allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 555/BANG/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore27 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri George George K & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri. Ramakrishna Kamat, CAFor Respondent: Shri. Subramanian S, Addl. CIT (DR), ITAT, Bengaluru
Section 200ASection 234ESection 250

B” BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI GEORGE GEORGE K, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI LAXMI PRASAD SAHU, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA Nos.531 to 533/Bang/2023, 554 to 567/Bang/2023 Assessment Years : 2012-13 to 2014-15 M/s. Prakat Solutions Pvt. Ltd., DCIT, 147, Rainbow Residency, Off. Circle – 3(1)(1), Sarjapura Road, Vs. Bengaluru. Junnasandra Village, Carmelaram, Bengaluru – 560 035. PAN : AAFCP 3783 R APPELLANT

M/S. PRAKAT SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED,BENGALURU vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE-3(1)(1)(, BENGALURU

In the result, all the appeals by the assessee are treated as allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 559/BANG/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore27 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri George George K & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri. Ramakrishna Kamat, CAFor Respondent: Shri. Subramanian S, Addl. CIT (DR), ITAT, Bengaluru
Section 200ASection 234ESection 250

B” BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI GEORGE GEORGE K, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI LAXMI PRASAD SAHU, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA Nos.531 to 533/Bang/2023, 554 to 567/Bang/2023 Assessment Years : 2012-13 to 2014-15 M/s. Prakat Solutions Pvt. Ltd., DCIT, 147, Rainbow Residency, Off. Circle – 3(1)(1), Sarjapura Road, Vs. Bengaluru. Junnasandra Village, Carmelaram, Bengaluru – 560 035. PAN : AAFCP 3783 R APPELLANT

M/S. PRAKAT SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED,BENGALURU vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE-3(1)(1) , BENGALURU

In the result, all the appeals by the assessee are treated as allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 564/BANG/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore27 Sept 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri George George K & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri. Ramakrishna Kamat, CAFor Respondent: Shri. Subramanian S, Addl. CIT (DR), ITAT, Bengaluru
Section 200ASection 234ESection 250

B” BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI GEORGE GEORGE K, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI LAXMI PRASAD SAHU, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA Nos.531 to 533/Bang/2023, 554 to 567/Bang/2023 Assessment Years : 2012-13 to 2014-15 M/s. Prakat Solutions Pvt. Ltd., DCIT, 147, Rainbow Residency, Off. Circle – 3(1)(1), Sarjapura Road, Vs. Bengaluru. Junnasandra Village, Carmelaram, Bengaluru – 560 035. PAN : AAFCP 3783 R APPELLANT

M/S. PRAKAT SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED,BENGALURU vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE-3(1)(1)(1), BENGALURU

In the result, all the appeals by the assessee are treated as allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 561/BANG/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore27 Sept 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri George George K & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri. Ramakrishna Kamat, CAFor Respondent: Shri. Subramanian S, Addl. CIT (DR), ITAT, Bengaluru
Section 200ASection 234ESection 250

B” BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI GEORGE GEORGE K, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI LAXMI PRASAD SAHU, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA Nos.531 to 533/Bang/2023, 554 to 567/Bang/2023 Assessment Years : 2012-13 to 2014-15 M/s. Prakat Solutions Pvt. Ltd., DCIT, 147, Rainbow Residency, Off. Circle – 3(1)(1), Sarjapura Road, Vs. Bengaluru. Junnasandra Village, Carmelaram, Bengaluru – 560 035. PAN : AAFCP 3783 R APPELLANT

M/S. PRAKAT SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED ,BENGALURU vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE-3(1)(1) , BENGALURU

In the result, all the appeals by the assessee are treated as allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 556/BANG/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore27 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri George George K & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri. Ramakrishna Kamat, CAFor Respondent: Shri. Subramanian S, Addl. CIT (DR), ITAT, Bengaluru
Section 200ASection 234ESection 250

B” BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI GEORGE GEORGE K, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI LAXMI PRASAD SAHU, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA Nos.531 to 533/Bang/2023, 554 to 567/Bang/2023 Assessment Years : 2012-13 to 2014-15 M/s. Prakat Solutions Pvt. Ltd., DCIT, 147, Rainbow Residency, Off. Circle – 3(1)(1), Sarjapura Road, Vs. Bengaluru. Junnasandra Village, Carmelaram, Bengaluru – 560 035. PAN : AAFCP 3783 R APPELLANT

M/S. PRAKAT SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED,BENGALURU vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE-3(1)(1), BENGALURU

In the result, all the appeals by the assessee are treated as allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 558/BANG/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore27 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri George George K & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri. Ramakrishna Kamat, CAFor Respondent: Shri. Subramanian S, Addl. CIT (DR), ITAT, Bengaluru
Section 200ASection 234ESection 250

B” BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI GEORGE GEORGE K, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI LAXMI PRASAD SAHU, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA Nos.531 to 533/Bang/2023, 554 to 567/Bang/2023 Assessment Years : 2012-13 to 2014-15 M/s. Prakat Solutions Pvt. Ltd., DCIT, 147, Rainbow Residency, Off. Circle – 3(1)(1), Sarjapura Road, Vs. Bengaluru. Junnasandra Village, Carmelaram, Bengaluru – 560 035. PAN : AAFCP 3783 R APPELLANT

M/S. PRAKAT SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED,BENGALURU vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE-3(1)(1), BENGALURU

In the result, all the appeals by the assessee are treated as allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 565/BANG/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore27 Sept 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri George George K & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri. Ramakrishna Kamat, CAFor Respondent: Shri. Subramanian S, Addl. CIT (DR), ITAT, Bengaluru
Section 200ASection 234ESection 250

B” BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI GEORGE GEORGE K, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI LAXMI PRASAD SAHU, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA Nos.531 to 533/Bang/2023, 554 to 567/Bang/2023 Assessment Years : 2012-13 to 2014-15 M/s. Prakat Solutions Pvt. Ltd., DCIT, 147, Rainbow Residency, Off. Circle – 3(1)(1), Sarjapura Road, Vs. Bengaluru. Junnasandra Village, Carmelaram, Bengaluru – 560 035. PAN : AAFCP 3783 R APPELLANT

M/S. PRAKAT SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED,BENGALURU vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE-3(1)(1), BENGALURU

In the result, all the appeals by the assessee are treated as allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 560/BANG/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore27 Sept 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri George George K & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri. Ramakrishna Kamat, CAFor Respondent: Shri. Subramanian S, Addl. CIT (DR), ITAT, Bengaluru
Section 200ASection 234ESection 250

B” BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI GEORGE GEORGE K, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI LAXMI PRASAD SAHU, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA Nos.531 to 533/Bang/2023, 554 to 567/Bang/2023 Assessment Years : 2012-13 to 2014-15 M/s. Prakat Solutions Pvt. Ltd., DCIT, 147, Rainbow Residency, Off. Circle – 3(1)(1), Sarjapura Road, Vs. Bengaluru. Junnasandra Village, Carmelaram, Bengaluru – 560 035. PAN : AAFCP 3783 R APPELLANT

M/S. PRAKAT SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED,BENGALURU vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE-3(1)(1) , BENGALURU

In the result, all the appeals by the assessee are treated as allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 563/BANG/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore27 Sept 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri George George K & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri. Ramakrishna Kamat, CAFor Respondent: Shri. Subramanian S, Addl. CIT (DR), ITAT, Bengaluru
Section 200ASection 234ESection 250

B” BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI GEORGE GEORGE K, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI LAXMI PRASAD SAHU, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA Nos.531 to 533/Bang/2023, 554 to 567/Bang/2023 Assessment Years : 2012-13 to 2014-15 M/s. Prakat Solutions Pvt. Ltd., DCIT, 147, Rainbow Residency, Off. Circle – 3(1)(1), Sarjapura Road, Vs. Bengaluru. Junnasandra Village, Carmelaram, Bengaluru – 560 035. PAN : AAFCP 3783 R APPELLANT