BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

99 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 43(6)(b)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi281Chennai254Mumbai224Chandigarh122Jaipur115Ahmedabad106Hyderabad104Bangalore99Kolkata93Pune82Amritsar39Raipur36Indore29Lucknow29SC25Cochin24Surat21Rajkot15Nagpur15Visakhapatnam14Patna12Guwahati8Cuttack7Varanasi5Dehradun4Panaji4Jodhpur2Jabalpur1Ranchi1

Key Topics

Section 234E97Section 200A51Section 25047Addition to Income45Condonation of Delay40Disallowance37Section 143(3)32Limitation/Time-bar28TDS

M/S. RMZ HOTELS PRIVATE LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. NATIONAL E-ASSESSMENT CENTRE, DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 954/BANG/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore22 Feb 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojariassessment Year: 2018-19

For Appellant: Shri V. Srinivasan, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Ganesh R. Ghale, Standing Counsel for Department
Section 234Section 255Section 255(3)Section 36

condone the above delay and admit the appeal for adjudication. 4. The first ground for our consideration is with regard to the disallowance of Rs.99,02,829/-, which is claimed by assessee as an interest payment. The assessee in the year under consideration advanced a sum of Rs.41 crores towards purchase of shares. The AO questioned the sources of Rs.41

Showing 1–20 of 99 · Page 1 of 5

28
Section 80P27
Section 14A27
Section 143(1)25

THE KARNATAKA STATE CO-OPERATIVE AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK,BENGALURU vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-5(2)(1), BANGALORE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee stands partly\nallowed as indicated herinabove

ITA 1053/BANG/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore29 Apr 2024AY 2013-14
For Appellant: Shri Bharadwaj SheshadriFor Respondent: Shri D.K. Mishra, CIT – DR
Section 80PSection 80P(4)

delay in filing the above appeals before this\nTribunal stands condoned.\n5. The Ld.AR submitted that the order of the Ld.CIT(A) dated\n11.05.2023 impugned in ITA No.1054/Bang/2023 was signed at\n17.28 hours, while the order impugned in ITA No.\n1053/Bang/2023 was signed at 17.38 hours on the same day. It\nis submitted that both the orders are identical (except

THE KARNATAKA STATE CO-OPERATIVE AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK,BENGALURU vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-5(2)(1), BANGALORE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee stands partly\nallowed as indicated herinabove

ITA 1059/BANG/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore29 Apr 2024AY 2018-19
For Appellant: \nShri K. Sheshadri, CA &For Respondent: \nShri D.K. Mishra, CIT – DR
Section 80PSection 80P(4)

delay in filing the above appeals before this\nTribunal stands condoned.\n5. The Ld.AR submitted that the order of the Ld.CIT(A) dated\n11.05.2023 impugned in ITA No.1054/Bang/2023 was signed at\n17.28 hours, while the order impugned in ITA No.\n1053/Bang/2023 was signed at 17.38 hours on the same day. It\nis submitted that both the orders are identical (except

THE KARNATAKA STATE CO-OPERATIVE AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK ,BENGALURU vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICE, WARD-5(2)(1), BENGALURU

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee stands partly\nallowed as indicated herinabove

ITA 1052/BANG/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore29 Apr 2024AY 2012-13
For Appellant: Shri K. Sheshadri, CA &For Respondent: Shri D.K. Mishra, CIT – DR
Section 80PSection 80P(4)

delay in filing the above appeals before this\nTribunal stands condoned.\n5. The Ld.AR submitted that the order of the Ld.CIT(A) dated\n11.05.2023 impugned in ITA No.1054/Bang/2023 was signed at\n17.28 hours, while the order impugned in ITA No.\n1053/Bang/2023 was signed at 17.38 hours on the same day. It\nis submitted that both the orders are identical (except

THE KARNATAKA STATE CO-OPERATIVE AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK,BENGALURU vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-5(2)(1), BANGALORE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee stands partly\nallowed as indicated herinabove

ITA 1060/BANG/2023[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore29 Apr 2024AY 2020-21
For Appellant: \nShri K. Sheshadri, CA &For Respondent: \nShri D.K. Mishra, CIT – DR
Section 80PSection 80P(4)

delay in filing the above appeals before this\nTribunal stands condoned.\n5. The Ld.AR submitted that the order of the Ld.CIT(A) dated\n11.05.2023 impugned in ITA No.1054/Bang/2023 was signed at\n17.28 hours, while the order impugned in ITA No.\n1053/Bang/2023 was signed at 17.38 hours on the same day. It\nis submitted that both the orders are identical (except

THE KARNATAKA STATE CO-OPERATIVE AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK,BENGALURU vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-5(2)(1) , BANGALORE

ITA 1055/BANG/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore29 Apr 2024AY 2014-15
For Appellant: \nShri Bharadwaj SheshadriFor Respondent: \nShri D.K. Mishra, CIT – DR
Section 80PSection 80P(4)

delay in filing the above appeals before this\nTribunal stands condoned.\n5. The Ld.AR submitted that the order of the Ld.CIT(A) dated\n11.05.2023 impugned in ITA No.1054/Bang/2023 was signed at\n17.28 hours, while the order impugned in ITA No.\n1053/Bang/2023 was signed at 17.38 hours on the same day. It\nis submitted that both the orders are identical (except

THE KARNATAKA STATE CO-OPERATIVE AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK,BENGALURU vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD- 5(2)(1), BANGALORE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee stands partly\nallowed as indicated herinabove

ITA 1057/BANG/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore29 Apr 2024AY 2016-17
For Appellant: \nShri K. Sheshadri, CA &For Respondent: \nShri D.K. Mishra, CIT – DR
Section 80PSection 80P(4)

delay in filing the above appeals before this\nTribunal stands condoned.\n5. The Ld.AR submitted that the order of the Ld.CIT(A) dated\n11.05.2023 impugned in ITA No.1054/Bang/2023 was signed at\n17.28 hours, while the order impugned in ITA No.\n1053/Bang/2023 was signed at 17.38 hours on the same day. It\nis submitted that both the orders are identical (except

THE KARNATAKA STATE CO-OPERATIVE AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK,BENGALURU vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD-5(2)(1), BANGALORE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee stands partly\nallowed as indicated herinabove

ITA 1054/BANG/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore29 Apr 2024AY 2013-14
Section 80PSection 80P(4)

delay in filing the above appeals before this\nTribunal stands condoned.\n5. The Ld.AR submitted that the order of the Ld.CIT(A) dated\n11.05.2023 impugned in ITA No.1054/Bang/2023 was signed at\n17.28 hours, while the order impugned in ITA No.\n1053/Bang/2023 was signed at 17.38 hours on the same day. It\nis submitted that both the orders are identical (except

THE KARNATAKA STATE CO-OPERATIVE AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK,BENGALURU vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-5(2)(1), BANGALORE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee stands partly\nallowed as indicated herinabove

ITA 1056/BANG/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore29 Apr 2024AY 2015-16
For Appellant: \nShri K. Sheshadri, CA &For Respondent: \nShri D.K. Mishra, CIT – DR
Section 80PSection 80P(4)

delay in filing the above appeals before this\nTribunal stands condoned.\n5. The Ld.AR submitted that the order of the Ld.CIT(A) dated\n11.05.2023 impugned in ITA No.1054/Bang/2023 was signed at\n17.28 hours, while the order impugned in ITA No.\n1053/Bang/2023 was signed at 17.38 hours on the same day. It\nis submitted that both the orders are identical (except

THE KARNATAKA STATE CO-OPERATIVE AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK,BENGALURU vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-5(2)(1), BANGALORE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee stands partly\nallowed as indicated herinabove

ITA 1058/BANG/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore29 Apr 2024AY 2017-18
For Appellant: \nShri K. Sheshadri, CA &For Respondent: \nShri D.K. Mishra, CIT – DR
Section 80PSection 80P(4)

delay in filing the above appeals before this\nTribunal stands condoned.\n\n5. The Ld.AR submitted that the order of the Ld.CIT(A) dated\n11.05.2023 impugned in ITA No.1054/Bang/2023 was signed at\n17.28 hours, while the order impugned in ITA No.\n1053/Bang/2023 was signed at 17.38 hours on the same day. It\nis submitted that both the orders are identical

M/S. TATA ELXSI LIMITED., ,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-7(1)(1), BANGALORE

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 927/BANG/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore08 Jan 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri George George K. & Shri Chandra Poojari

For Appellant: Shri Padam Chand Kincha, A.RFor Respondent: Shri D.K. Mishra, D.R
Section 10ASection 30Section 80ASection 80H

Delay condoned. 2. In all these appeals issue relates to the interpretation that is to be accorded to the provisions of Section 80HH of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act'). Section 80HH and other related provisions, as it existed at the relevant time, are to be taken note of since we are concerned with

M/S. PRAKAT SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED,BENGALURU vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE-3(1)(1), BENGALURU

In the result, all the appeals by the assessee are treated as allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 565/BANG/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore27 Sept 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri George George K & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri. Ramakrishna Kamat, CAFor Respondent: Shri. Subramanian S, Addl. CIT (DR), ITAT, Bengaluru
Section 200ASection 234ESection 250

B” BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI GEORGE GEORGE K, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI LAXMI PRASAD SAHU, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA Nos.531 to 533/Bang/2023, 554 to 567/Bang/2023 Assessment Years : 2012-13 to 2014-15 M/s. Prakat Solutions Pvt. Ltd., DCIT, 147, Rainbow Residency, Off. Circle – 3(1)(1), Sarjapura Road, Vs. Bengaluru. Junnasandra Village, Carmelaram, Bengaluru – 560 035. PAN : AAFCP 3783 R APPELLANT

M/S. PRAKAT SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED,BENGALURU vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE-3(1)(1) , BENGALURU

In the result, all the appeals by the assessee are treated as allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 567/BANG/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore27 Sept 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri George George K & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri. Ramakrishna Kamat, CAFor Respondent: Shri. Subramanian S, Addl. CIT (DR), ITAT, Bengaluru
Section 200ASection 234ESection 250

B” BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI GEORGE GEORGE K, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI LAXMI PRASAD SAHU, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA Nos.531 to 533/Bang/2023, 554 to 567/Bang/2023 Assessment Years : 2012-13 to 2014-15 M/s. Prakat Solutions Pvt. Ltd., DCIT, 147, Rainbow Residency, Off. Circle – 3(1)(1), Sarjapura Road, Vs. Bengaluru. Junnasandra Village, Carmelaram, Bengaluru – 560 035. PAN : AAFCP 3783 R APPELLANT

M/S. PRAKAT SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED,BENGALURU vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE-3(1)(1) , BENGALURU

In the result, all the appeals by the assessee are treated as allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 564/BANG/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore27 Sept 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri George George K & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri. Ramakrishna Kamat, CAFor Respondent: Shri. Subramanian S, Addl. CIT (DR), ITAT, Bengaluru
Section 200ASection 234ESection 250

B” BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI GEORGE GEORGE K, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI LAXMI PRASAD SAHU, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA Nos.531 to 533/Bang/2023, 554 to 567/Bang/2023 Assessment Years : 2012-13 to 2014-15 M/s. Prakat Solutions Pvt. Ltd., DCIT, 147, Rainbow Residency, Off. Circle – 3(1)(1), Sarjapura Road, Vs. Bengaluru. Junnasandra Village, Carmelaram, Bengaluru – 560 035. PAN : AAFCP 3783 R APPELLANT

M/S. PRAKAT SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED,BENGALURU vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE-3(1)(1) , BENGALURU

In the result, all the appeals by the assessee are treated as allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 563/BANG/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore27 Sept 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri George George K & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri. Ramakrishna Kamat, CAFor Respondent: Shri. Subramanian S, Addl. CIT (DR), ITAT, Bengaluru
Section 200ASection 234ESection 250

B” BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI GEORGE GEORGE K, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI LAXMI PRASAD SAHU, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA Nos.531 to 533/Bang/2023, 554 to 567/Bang/2023 Assessment Years : 2012-13 to 2014-15 M/s. Prakat Solutions Pvt. Ltd., DCIT, 147, Rainbow Residency, Off. Circle – 3(1)(1), Sarjapura Road, Vs. Bengaluru. Junnasandra Village, Carmelaram, Bengaluru – 560 035. PAN : AAFCP 3783 R APPELLANT

M/S. PRAKAT SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED ,BENGALURU vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE-3(1)(1) , BENGALURU

In the result, all the appeals by the assessee are treated as allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 556/BANG/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore27 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri George George K & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri. Ramakrishna Kamat, CAFor Respondent: Shri. Subramanian S, Addl. CIT (DR), ITAT, Bengaluru
Section 200ASection 234ESection 250

B” BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI GEORGE GEORGE K, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI LAXMI PRASAD SAHU, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA Nos.531 to 533/Bang/2023, 554 to 567/Bang/2023 Assessment Years : 2012-13 to 2014-15 M/s. Prakat Solutions Pvt. Ltd., DCIT, 147, Rainbow Residency, Off. Circle – 3(1)(1), Sarjapura Road, Vs. Bengaluru. Junnasandra Village, Carmelaram, Bengaluru – 560 035. PAN : AAFCP 3783 R APPELLANT

M/S. PRAKAT SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED,BENGALURU vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE-3(1)(1), BENGALURU

In the result, all the appeals by the assessee are treated as allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 558/BANG/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore27 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri George George K & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri. Ramakrishna Kamat, CAFor Respondent: Shri. Subramanian S, Addl. CIT (DR), ITAT, Bengaluru
Section 200ASection 234ESection 250

B” BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI GEORGE GEORGE K, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI LAXMI PRASAD SAHU, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA Nos.531 to 533/Bang/2023, 554 to 567/Bang/2023 Assessment Years : 2012-13 to 2014-15 M/s. Prakat Solutions Pvt. Ltd., DCIT, 147, Rainbow Residency, Off. Circle – 3(1)(1), Sarjapura Road, Vs. Bengaluru. Junnasandra Village, Carmelaram, Bengaluru – 560 035. PAN : AAFCP 3783 R APPELLANT

M/S. PRAKAT SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED,BENGALURU vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE 3(1)(1), BENGALURU

In the result, all the appeals by the assessee are treated as allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 557/BANG/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore27 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri George George K & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri. Ramakrishna Kamat, CAFor Respondent: Shri. Subramanian S, Addl. CIT (DR), ITAT, Bengaluru
Section 200ASection 234ESection 250

B” BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI GEORGE GEORGE K, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI LAXMI PRASAD SAHU, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA Nos.531 to 533/Bang/2023, 554 to 567/Bang/2023 Assessment Years : 2012-13 to 2014-15 M/s. Prakat Solutions Pvt. Ltd., DCIT, 147, Rainbow Residency, Off. Circle – 3(1)(1), Sarjapura Road, Vs. Bengaluru. Junnasandra Village, Carmelaram, Bengaluru – 560 035. PAN : AAFCP 3783 R APPELLANT

M/S. PRAKAT SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED,BENGALURU vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE-3(1)(1), BENGALURU

In the result, all the appeals by the assessee are treated as allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 566/BANG/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore27 Sept 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri George George K & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri. Ramakrishna Kamat, CAFor Respondent: Shri. Subramanian S, Addl. CIT (DR), ITAT, Bengaluru
Section 200ASection 234ESection 250

B” BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI GEORGE GEORGE K, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI LAXMI PRASAD SAHU, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA Nos.531 to 533/Bang/2023, 554 to 567/Bang/2023 Assessment Years : 2012-13 to 2014-15 M/s. Prakat Solutions Pvt. Ltd., DCIT, 147, Rainbow Residency, Off. Circle – 3(1)(1), Sarjapura Road, Vs. Bengaluru. Junnasandra Village, Carmelaram, Bengaluru – 560 035. PAN : AAFCP 3783 R APPELLANT

M/S. PRAKAT SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED,BENGALURU vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE-3(1)(1), BENGALURU

In the result, all the appeals by the assessee are treated as allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 562/BANG/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore27 Sept 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri George George K & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri. Ramakrishna Kamat, CAFor Respondent: Shri. Subramanian S, Addl. CIT (DR), ITAT, Bengaluru
Section 200ASection 234ESection 250

B” BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI GEORGE GEORGE K, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI LAXMI PRASAD SAHU, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA Nos.531 to 533/Bang/2023, 554 to 567/Bang/2023 Assessment Years : 2012-13 to 2014-15 M/s. Prakat Solutions Pvt. Ltd., DCIT, 147, Rainbow Residency, Off. Circle – 3(1)(1), Sarjapura Road, Vs. Bengaluru. Junnasandra Village, Carmelaram, Bengaluru – 560 035. PAN : AAFCP 3783 R APPELLANT