ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BENGALURU vs. CMR JNANADHARA TRUST, BENGALURU

In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue is hereby dismissed

Bench: Shri George George K & Shri Waseem Ahmed

2) lists conditions which are deemed to be violation under sections 13(1)(c) or 13(1)(d). (i) Section 13(1)(c) - Benefit to interested persons Section 13 (1)(c) of the Act has carved out an exception from exemption in cases where a part. of income of a charitable or religious trust

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BENGALURU vs. CMR JNANADHARA TRUST, BENGALURU

In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue is hereby dismissed

Bench: Shri George George K & Shri Waseem Ahmed

2) lists conditions which are deemed to be violation under sections 13(1)(c) or 13(1)(d). (i) Section 13(1)(c) - Benefit to interested persons Section 13 (1)(c) of the Act has carved out an exception from exemption in cases where a part. of income of a charitable or religious trust

SHRI HINGULAMBIKA EDUCATION SOCIETY,GULBARGA vs. ITO (EXEMPTIONS), WARD-1, KALBURGI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillaiassessment Year: 2020-21

1 of Section 12 A, Sub-section 2 of section 12 A extends benefit even when application for registration of Trust or Institution has been made on or after first day of June 2007. It would however be in relation to the income of the Trust or the Institution from the assessment year immediately following the financial year in which

M/S ATRIA POWER CORPROATION LTD.,,BANGALORE vs. ITO, BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Sunil Kumar Yadav & Shri A.K. Garodiaassessment Year : 2010-11

Trust: 247 ITR 785 [TS-5005-SC-2001-O] Page 21 of 48 - UOI v. Onkar Kanwar : [TS-5021-SC-2002-O] - CIT v. A. J. Abraham Anthraper : [TS-5230-HC-2004(Kerala)-O] - Vijay Omprakash Bansal v. CIT : [TS-6051-HC-2001(Bombay)-O] - CIT v. L.G Balakrishnan: [TS-5374-HC-2001(Madras)-O] - CIT v. Quantas Airlines

INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-1(1)(2), BANGALORE vs. M/S ATRIA HYDEL POWER LIMITED , BANGALORE

In the result, ITA Nos.534 to 556/Bang/2018 and CO Nos

Bench: Shri N. V. Vasudevan & Shri Jason P. Boazassessment Years : 2010-11 Income-Tax Officer, Vs. M/S. Atria Hydel Power Ltd., Ward - 1(1)(2), #1, Palace Road, Bengaluru. Bangalore-560 001. Pan : Aacca 3754 E Appellant Respondent

Trust: 247 ITR 785 [TS-5005-SC- 2001-O] - UOI v. Onkar Kanwar : [TS-5021-SC-2002-O] - CIT v. A. J. Abraham Anthraper : [TS-5230-HC- 2004(Kerala)-O] - Vijay Omprakash Bansal v. CIT : [TS-6051-HC- 2001(Bombay)-O] - CIT v. L.G Balakrishnan: [TS-5374-HC- 2001(Madras)-O] - CIT v. Quantas Airlines

M/S. RUKMINI EDUCATIONAL CHARITABLE TRUST,BENGALURU vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL , BENGALURU

2 of 81\nITA Nos.2106 to 2109/Bang/2024\n06.\nREFERENCE FOR CANCELLATION OF APPROVAL GRANTED U/S 12A IN THE CASE OF M/S\nRUKMINI EDUCATIONAL CHARITABLE TRUST FOR THE AY 2019-20\n1. Introduction\n1.1 The Assessee Trust, Rukmini Educational Charitable Society founded in 2003 is a charitable\ntrust engaged in managing the REVA Group of Educational Institutions, which is responsible\nfor

M/S. RUKMINI EDUCATIONAL CHARITABLE TRUST ,BENGALURU vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL , BANGALORE

2 of 81\nITA Nos.2106 to 2109/Bang/2024\n06.\nREFERENCE FOR CANCELLATION OF APPROVAL GRANTED U/S 12A IN THE CASE OF M/S\nRUKMINI EDUCATIONAL CHARITABLE TRUST FOR THE AY 2019-20\n1. Introduction\n1.1 The Assessee Trust, Rukmini Educational Charitable Society founded in 2003 is a charitable\ntrust engaged in managing the REVA Group of Educational Institutions, which is responsible\nfor

SADIYA EDUCATIONAL AND CHARITABLE TRUST vs. CIT,

In the result, the assessee's appeals are allowed

Bench: Smt. P. Madhavi Devi & Shri Jason P. Boazi.T. A. Nos.422 & 1632/Bang/2013 M/S. Sadiya Educational & Charitable Trust, Mattadgadde Road, Sadiya Nagar, Shiralkoppa-577 428 …. Appellant.

charitable and even if some of them are considered for the benefit of the community, they are for women and children of the community, which is excepted by explanation (2) to section 13(1)(b) of the Act. 4. Without prejudice to the above, even assuming the trust

M/S. UDUPI NIRMITHI KENDRA,UDUPI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, (EXEMPTIONS) CIRCLE-1, MANGALORE

In the result, all appeals filed by the assessees in all the assessees’ appeals are dismissed except for assessment year

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Shri George George K.Assessment Year: 2013-14

1/ 2009 dated 27.03.2009, explaining the provisions of the Finance Act, 2008. The relevant extract reads as under: “5. Streamlining the definition of “charitable purpose” ITA No.947&948 /Bang/2019, ITA 1962/Bang/2018 & ITA Nos.2086 to 2089/Bang/2018 M/s. Udupi Nirmithi Kendra, Udupi & Dakshina Kannada Nirmithi Kendra, Manguluru Page 6 of 176 5.1 Sub-section (15) of section 2 of the Act defines

DAKSHINA KANNADA NIRMITHI KENDRA ,MANGALURU vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(1),, MANGALURU

In the result, all appeals filed by the assessees in all the assessees’ appeals are dismissed except for assessment year

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Shri George George K.Assessment Year: 2013-14

1/ 2009 dated 27.03.2009, explaining the provisions of the Finance Act, 2008. The relevant extract reads as under: “5. Streamlining the definition of “charitable purpose” ITA No.947&948 /Bang/2019, ITA 1962/Bang/2018 & ITA Nos.2086 to 2089/Bang/2018 M/s. Udupi Nirmithi Kendra, Udupi & Dakshina Kannada Nirmithi Kendra, Manguluru Page 6 of 176 5.1 Sub-section (15) of section 2 of the Act defines

DAKSHINA KANNADA NIRMITHI KENDRA ,MANGALURU vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(1),, MANGALURU

In the result, all appeals filed by the assessees in all the assessees’ appeals are dismissed except for assessment year

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Shri George George K.Assessment Year: 2013-14

1/ 2009 dated 27.03.2009, explaining the provisions of the Finance Act, 2008. The relevant extract reads as under: “5. Streamlining the definition of “charitable purpose” ITA No.947&948 /Bang/2019, ITA 1962/Bang/2018 & ITA Nos.2086 to 2089/Bang/2018 M/s. Udupi Nirmithi Kendra, Udupi & Dakshina Kannada Nirmithi Kendra, Manguluru Page 6 of 176 5.1 Sub-section (15) of section 2 of the Act defines

M/S. UDUPI NIRMITHI KEDRA,UDUPI vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS), CIRCLE - 1, MANGALURU

In the result, all appeals filed by the assessees in all the assessees’ appeals are dismissed except for assessment year

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Shri George George K.Assessment Year: 2013-14

1/ 2009 dated 27.03.2009, explaining the provisions of the Finance Act, 2008. The relevant extract reads as under: “5. Streamlining the definition of “charitable purpose” ITA No.947&948 /Bang/2019, ITA 1962/Bang/2018 & ITA Nos.2086 to 2089/Bang/2018 M/s. Udupi Nirmithi Kendra, Udupi & Dakshina Kannada Nirmithi Kendra, Manguluru Page 6 of 176 5.1 Sub-section (15) of section 2 of the Act defines

DAKSHINA KANNADA NIRMITHI KENDRA ,MANGALURU vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, (EXEMPTIONS), CIRCLE-1,, MANGALURU

In the result, all appeals filed by the assessees in all the assessees’ appeals are dismissed except for assessment year

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Shri George George K.Assessment Year: 2013-14

1/ 2009 dated 27.03.2009, explaining the provisions of the Finance Act, 2008. The relevant extract reads as under: “5. Streamlining the definition of “charitable purpose” ITA No.947&948 /Bang/2019, ITA 1962/Bang/2018 & ITA Nos.2086 to 2089/Bang/2018 M/s. Udupi Nirmithi Kendra, Udupi & Dakshina Kannada Nirmithi Kendra, Manguluru Page 6 of 176 5.1 Sub-section (15) of section 2 of the Act defines

DAKSHINA KANNADA NIRMITHI KENDRA ,MANGALURU vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(1),, MANGALURU

In the result, all appeals filed by the assessees in all the assessees’ appeals are dismissed except for assessment year

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Shri George George K.Assessment Year: 2013-14

1/ 2009 dated 27.03.2009, explaining the provisions of the Finance Act, 2008. The relevant extract reads as under: “5. Streamlining the definition of “charitable purpose” ITA No.947&948 /Bang/2019, ITA 1962/Bang/2018 & ITA Nos.2086 to 2089/Bang/2018 M/s. Udupi Nirmithi Kendra, Udupi & Dakshina Kannada Nirmithi Kendra, Manguluru Page 6 of 176 5.1 Sub-section (15) of section 2 of the Act defines

M/S. DAKSHINA KANNADA NIRMITHI KENDRA,MANGALURU vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS), CIRCLE -1, MANGALURU

In the result, all appeals filed by the assessees in all the assessees’ appeals are dismissed except for assessment year

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Shri George George K.Assessment Year: 2013-14

1/ 2009 dated 27.03.2009, explaining the provisions of the Finance Act, 2008. The relevant extract reads as under: “5. Streamlining the definition of “charitable purpose” ITA No.947&948 /Bang/2019, ITA 1962/Bang/2018 & ITA Nos.2086 to 2089/Bang/2018 M/s. Udupi Nirmithi Kendra, Udupi & Dakshina Kannada Nirmithi Kendra, Manguluru Page 6 of 176 5.1 Sub-section (15) of section 2 of the Act defines

SHRI SHRUTHIPARAMPARA GURUKULAM,BANGALORE vs. ITO, WARD-3, EXEMPTIONS, BANGALORE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee-trust are allowed

Bench: Shri N. V. Vasudevan & Shri Chandra Poojari

charitable trust. Consequently, the approval under section 80G of the Act is to be granted. It is ordered accordingly. 28. In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee-trust are allowed. Pronounced in the open court on the date mentioned on the caption page. (CHANDRA POOJARI) Vice President Bangalore, Dated: 09.01.2023. /NS/* Copy to: 1. Appellants 2

SHRI SHRUTHIPARAMPARA GURUKULAM,BANGALORE vs. ITO, WARD-3, EXEMPTIONS, BANGALORE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee-trust are allowed

Bench: Shri N. V. Vasudevan & Shri Chandra Poojari

charitable trust. Consequently, the approval under section 80G of the Act is to be granted. It is ordered accordingly. 28. In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee-trust are allowed. Pronounced in the open court on the date mentioned on the caption page. (CHANDRA POOJARI) Vice President Bangalore, Dated: 09.01.2023. /NS/* Copy to: 1. Appellants 2

SANGHAMITRA RURAL FINANCIAL SERVICES,BANGALORE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, EXEMPTIONS CIRCLE-1, BANGALORE

In the result, appeals of the assessee are dismissed

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Madhumita Roy

trust is at an average of 5%, which is the lowest in the industry and the assessee offers incentives of 1% to 2% odd to the NGO, self-help groups, etc which co-ordinate with the individuals and are the point of contact with the assessee. Thus, the assessee makes little or meagre surplus on the earnings from interest