GOBINDRAM CHANDRAMANI VIVEK,BANGALORE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER - WARD 1(1), BANGALORE, BANGALORE
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes, in the manner indicated in this order
ITA 656/BANG/2023[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore13 Sept 2024AY 2011-12
Bench: Mrs. Beena Pillai & Shri Ramit Kochar
For Appellant: Sh. Ashok A Kulkarni, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms. Neha Sahay, JCIT
Section 139Section 139(1)Section 139(4)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 24Section 54Section 54(2)Section 54F
139(4), provided there is not diversion for some other purposes of long term capital gains received on the transfer of original asset. Thus, as adjudicated and held by Co-ordinate Bench in the case of Shri Ramaiah Dorairaj(supra) which has been relied upon by the assesee himself, the issue is remitted to the file
