SRI SRINIVASA TRUST,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(1), BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is hereby allowed

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Keshav Dubey

charitable trust shall be treated as an application of income only if the recipient trust is also registered under Section 12A of the Act. In this case, since the recipient trust was not registered, the AO concluded that the donation could not be considered an application of income under section 11

SRI SRINIVASA TRUST,BANGALORE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(1), BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is hereby allowed

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Keshav Dubey

charitable trust shall be treated as an application of income only if the recipient trust is also registered under Section 12A of the Act. In this case, since the recipient trust was not registered, the AO concluded that the donation could not be considered an application of income under section 11

DODDABALLAPUR PLANNING AUTHORITY,BANGALORE vs. ITO, EXEMPTION, WARD-3, BANGALORE

In the result appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

Bench: Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu & Shri Keshav Dubey

charitable purposes. Section 12 is in the nature of an Explanation of section 11. Section 12A provides that provisions of sections 11 and 12 shall not apply in relation to income of any trust

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BENGALURU vs. CMR JNANADHARA TRUST, BENGALURU

In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue is hereby dismissed

Bench: Shri George George K & Shri Waseem Ahmed

trust wholly for charitable or religious purposes, or which is of the nature referred to in sub-clause (ire) of clause (4 of section 2 or which is of the nature referred to in sub-section `4A) of section 11

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BENGALURU vs. CMR JNANADHARA TRUST, BENGALURU

In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue is hereby dismissed

Bench: Shri George George K & Shri Waseem Ahmed

trust wholly for charitable or religious purposes, or which is of the nature referred to in sub-clause (ire) of clause (4 of section 2 or which is of the nature referred to in sub-section `4A) of section 11

M/S. RUKMINI EDUCATIONAL CHARITABLE TRUST,BENGALURU vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL , BENGALURU

Charitable Trust, am\nsatisfied that the assessee, being a trust referred to in section 11 of the Act has committed

SHRI HINGULAMBIKA EDUCATION SOCIETY,GULBARGA vs. ITO (EXEMPTIONS), WARD-1, KALBURGI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillaiassessment Year: 2020-21

sections 11 and 12 are substantive provisions which provide for exemptions to a religious or charitable trust. Sections 12A and 12AA

M/S. RUKMINI EDUCATIONAL CHARITABLE TRUST ,BENGALURU vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL , BANGALORE

Charitable Trust, am\nsatisfied that the assessee, being a trust referred to in section 11 of the Act has committed

SHRI SHRUTHIPARAMPARA GURUKULAM,BANGALORE vs. ITO, WARD-3, EXEMPTIONS, BANGALORE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee-trust are allowed

Bench: Shri N. V. Vasudevan & Shri Chandra Poojari

Trust Committee Gangavathi Vs. CIT (E) – ITA No 1829/Bang/2018 (order dated 4.5.2022) explained the difference between charitable purpose and religious purpose and held as under:- “13. In sections 11

SHRI SHRUTHIPARAMPARA GURUKULAM,BANGALORE vs. ITO, WARD-3, EXEMPTIONS, BANGALORE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee-trust are allowed

Bench: Shri N. V. Vasudevan & Shri Chandra Poojari

Trust Committee Gangavathi Vs. CIT (E) – ITA No 1829/Bang/2018 (order dated 4.5.2022) explained the difference between charitable purpose and religious purpose and held as under:- “13. In sections 11

M/S. VIJAYANAGAR EDUCATIONAL TRUST,BENGALURU vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), BENGALURU

In the result appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi & Shri Soundararajan K.Assessment Year: 2019-20

Charitable Trust, 103 taxmann.com 419 and also the decision of the Chennai Bench of the Tribunal in the case of Shanmugham Trust [2024] 165 taxmann.com 669. ITA No.2006 /Bang/2019 Page 19 of 37 11. With respect to the violation of the provisions of section

KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, EXEMPTIONS, CIRCLE-1, BANGALORE

In the result, the grounds raised by the assessee in both the appeals\nare allowed except the limitation ground

charitable activity through advancement of\nan object of general public utility and therefore, has\nconcluded that the Proviso to Section 2(15) of the Act is\nnot applicable to the case of the assessee and has further\nheld that the assessee is entitled to benefit of Section\n11 of the Act. It has also been noticed that the Assessing\nofficer

CHITRADURGA ZILLA REDDY JANA SANGH(R),CHITRADURGA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1 EXEMPTION, HUBLI

In the result the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi & Shri Keshav Dubeyassessment Year : 2017-18

charitable trust, their income was assessable under self-contained code mentioned in section 11 to section 13 of the Income

KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER INCOME TAX, EXEMPTIONS, CIRCLE-1, , BANGALORE

In the result, the grounds raised by the assessee in both the appeals\nare allowed except the limitation ground

charitable activity through advancement of\nan object of general public utility and therefore, has\nconcluded that the Proviso to Section 2(15) of the Act is\nnot applicable to the case of the assessee and has further\nheld that the assessee is entitled to benefit of Section\n11 of the Act. It has also been noticed that the Assessing\nofficer

SANGHAMITRA RURAL FINANCIAL SERVICES,BANGALORE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, EXEMPTIONS CIRCLE-1, BANGALORE

In the result, appeals of the assessee are dismissed

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Madhumita Roy

trust. The facts and circumstances show that the assessee is carrying out its charitable activities and the surplus funds are used for charitable purposes. So, the CIT (A) was justified in holding that the assessee is engaged in charitable activities and qualify for exemption under section 11

MAGADI PLANNING AUTHORITY,RAMNAGAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3, BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is hereby allowed

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Keshav Dubey

charitable trust under Section 11 of the Act. 19.3 The proviso to subsection (2) of Section 12A of the Act provides

KARNATAKA CHINMAYA SEVA TRUST,BENGALURU vs. DCIT-(EXEMPTIONS) CIRCLE-1, BANGALORE

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu & Shri Keshav Dubeyassessmentyear:2016-17

Trust, Bangalore Page 11 of 25 7.1 Aggrieved by the assessment completed u/s 143(3) of the Act dated 26.12.2018, the assessee preferred an appeal before the ld. CIT(A)/NFAC. 7.2 The ld. CIT(A)/NFAC dismissed the appeal of the assessee by observing that section 139(4A) of the Act stipulates the requirement of the Charitable

AL-BADAR EDUCATIONAL AND CHARITABLE TRUST,KALABURAGI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL CIRCLE, BELLARY

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are allowed and the\nappeal of the assessee is dismissed

trusts and institutions.\nFor claiming such exemption, the income must be derived from\nproperties that are operating solely for religious or charitable\npurposes and the entities must obtain a registration certificate\nunder Section 12A or Section 12AA of the Act.\n\n26. A salient aspect which emanates from Section 11