BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

39 results for “capital gains”+ Section 80Jclear

Sorted by relevance

Bangalore39Mumbai28Delhi21Rajkot9Raipur8Ahmedabad6Chennai4Jodhpur3Kolkata2Jaipur2Surat2Nagpur1Indore1Hyderabad1

Key Topics

Section 80P54Section 80P(2)(a)54Deduction28Section 143(3)21Section 80P(2)(d)20Section 26320Section 8020Section 10A17Section 5615

TATA ELXSI LIMITED ,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISIONER INCOMER TAX, CIRCLE-7(1)(1), BANGALORE

Accordingly, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1152/BANG/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore28 Feb 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Narender Kumar Choudhry & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahuassessment Year : 2018-19 M/S. Tata Elxsi Ltd., The Deputy 126, Itpb Road, Commissioner Hoody, Of Income Tax, Whitefield, Circle – 7(1)(1), Bangalore – 560 048. Bangalore. Vs. Pan: Aaact7872Q Appellant Respondent

For Appellant: Shri Padam Chand Khincha, CAFor Respondent: Shri Subramanian .S, JCIT DR
Section 10ASection 10A(9)Section 250

capital gains and income from other sources. Insofar as income under the head 'profits and gains of business or professions' is concerned, provisions thereto are contained in Sections 28 to 44DB of the Act. Section 28 specifies various incomes which shall be chargeable to income tax under this head. Thereafter, Section 29 provides that income referred to in Section

Showing 1–20 of 39 · Page 1 of 2

Disallowance15
Addition to Income10
Exemption8

M/S. TATA ELXSI LIMITED., ,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-7(1)(1), BANGALORE

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 927/BANG/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore08 Jan 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri George George K. & Shri Chandra Poojari

For Appellant: Shri Padam Chand Kincha, A.RFor Respondent: Shri D.K. Mishra, D.R
Section 10ASection 30Section 80ASection 80H

capital gains and income from other sources. Insofar as income under the head 'profits and gains of business or professions' is concerned, provisions thereto are contained in Sections 28 to 44DB of the Act. Section 28 specifies various incomes which shall be chargeable to income tax under this head. Thereafter, Section 29 provides that income referred to in Section

IBM GLOBAL SERVICES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-11(1), BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed

ITA 3464/BANG/2004[2000-2001]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore31 Jul 2024AY 2000-2001

Bench: Smt. Beena Pillai & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahuassessment Year : 2000-2001

For Appellant: Shri Sharath Rao, CAFor Respondent: Shri D.K. Mishra, CIT-DR
Section 10ASection 10A(2)Section 10A(2)(ia)Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)

80J in relation to the profits and where such sale proceeds are credited to gains of the industrial undertaking; and a separate account maintained for the (iv) in computing the depreciation allowance purpose by the assessee with any bank under section 32, the written down value of outside India with the approval of the any asset used for the purposes

VIJAYA BANK EMPLOYEES CO-OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY,BANGALORE vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 7(2)(3), BANGALORE

In the result the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 1524/BANG/2025[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore15 Dec 2025AY 2022-23

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishiassessment Years 2022-23 Appellant / Assessee Vijaya Bank Employees Cooperative Credit Society, R No 1, 67, Ii Floor, K H Road Shantinagar Bangalore 560027 Karnataka Respondent The Income Tax Officer, Ward 7 (2) (3) Bmtc Building Koramangala Bangalore 560095 Pan Aaaav4696A For Appellant Shri Prasanna N Uralal Advocate For Respondent Shri Ganesh R Ghale, Advocate Date Of Hearing 04-11-2025 Date Of Pronouncement 15-12-2025 O R D E R

Section 139(1)Section 143(2)Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)

section-80J. In our view, since the expression of wider import, namely, "attributable to'', has been used, the legislature intended to cover receipts from sources other than the actual conduct of the business of generation and distribution of electricity.' 8. Therefore, the word "attributable to" is certainly wider in import than the expression "derived from". Whenever the legislature wanted

INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD-1, HOSPET vs. GAYATRI PATTINA SOUHARDA SAHAKARI SANGHA NIYAMITHA, HOSPET, HOSPET

In the result appeal filed by the Revenue is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1078/BANG/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore17 Jul 2025AY 2017-18
Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 250Section 80PSection 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)

gains derived from the conduct of the business of generation and distribution of electricity. In this connection, it may be pointed out that whenever the legislature wanted to give a restricted meaning in the manner suggested by the learned Solicitor General, it has used the expression \"derived from\", as for instance, in Section 80J. In our view, since the expression

INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD-7(2)(1), BENGALURU, BENGALURU vs. M/S. BANGALORE CREDIT CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED, BENGALURU

In the result both the appeals of the Revenue as well as\nCos of the Assessee for the Asst

ITA 2347/BANG/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore30 Jun 2025AY 2018-19
Section 250Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)

gains derived from the\nconduct of the business of generation and distribution of electricity. In\nthis connection, it may be pointed out that whenever the legislature\nwanted to give a restricted meaning in the manner suggested by the\nlearned Solicitor General, it has used the expression "derived from", as\nfor instance, in Section 80J. In our view, since the expression

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1, UDUPI, UUPI vs. KAMBADAKONE RYTARA SEVA SAHAKARI SANGHA LTD, UDUPI

ITA 1930/BANG/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore12 Jun 2025AY 2018-19
Section 194A(3)(v)Section 250Section 28Section 56Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)

gains derived from the\nconduct of the business of generation and distribution of electricity. In\nthis connection, it may be pointed out that whenever the legislature\nwanted to give a restricted meaning in the manner suggested by the\nlearned Solicitor General, it has used the expression "derived from", as\nfor instance, in Section 80J. In our view, since the expression

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, UDUPI vs. KAMBADAKONE RYTARA SEVA SAHAKARI SANGHA LTD, UPPUNDA

ITA 1929/BANG/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore12 Jun 2025AY 2017-18
For Appellant: Sri Mahesh R Uppin, A.RFor Respondent: Ms. Neha Sahay, D.R
Section 194A(3)(v)Section 250Section 28Section 56Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)

gains derived from the\nconduct of the business of generation and distribution of electricity. In\nthis connection, it may be pointed out that whenever the legislature\nwanted to give a restricted meaning in the manner suggested by the\nlearned Solicitor General, it has used the expression \"derived from\", as\nfor instance, in Section 80J. In our view, since the expression

THE KARNATAKA STATE CO-OPERATIVE AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK,BENGALURU vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD-5(2)(1), BANGALORE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee stands partly\nallowed as indicated herinabove

ITA 1054/BANG/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore29 Apr 2024AY 2013-14
Section 80PSection 80P(4)

section 80J.\nIn our view, since the expression of wider import, namely,\n"attributable to", has been used, the legislature intended to\ncover receipts from sources other than the actual conduct\nof the business of generation and distribution of\nelectricity."\n(emphasis supplied)\n17.3 Therefore, the word "attributable to" is certainly wider in\nimport than the expression "derived from". Whenever

THE KARNATAKA STATE CO-OPERATIVE AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK,BENGALURU vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-5(2)(1), BANGALORE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee stands partly\nallowed as indicated herinabove

ITA 1060/BANG/2023[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore29 Apr 2024AY 2020-21
For Appellant: \nShri K. Sheshadri, CA &For Respondent: \nShri D.K. Mishra, CIT – DR
Section 80PSection 80P(4)

section 80J.\nIn our view, since the expression of wider import, namely,\n\"attributable to\", has been used, the legislature intended to\ncover receipts from sources other than the actual conduct\nof the business of generation and distribution of\nelectricity.\"\n(emphasis supplied)\n17.3 Therefore, the word \"attributable to\" is certainly wider in\nimport than the expression \"derived from\". Whenever

THE KARNATAKA STATE CO-OPERATIVE AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK,BENGALURU vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-5(2)(1), BANGALORE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee stands partly\nallowed as indicated herinabove

ITA 1056/BANG/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore29 Apr 2024AY 2015-16
For Appellant: \nShri K. Sheshadri, CA &For Respondent: \nShri D.K. Mishra, CIT – DR
Section 80PSection 80P(4)

section 80J.\nIn our view, since the expression of wider import, namely,\n"attributable to", has been used, the legislature intended to\ncover receipts from sources other than the actual conduct\nof the business of generation and distribution of\nelectricity.\"\n(emphasis supplied)\n17.3 Therefore, the word "attributable to" is certainly wider in\nimport than the expression "derived from". Whenever

THE KARNATAKA STATE CO-OPERATIVE AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK ,BENGALURU vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICE, WARD-5(2)(1), BENGALURU

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee stands partly\nallowed as indicated herinabove

ITA 1052/BANG/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore29 Apr 2024AY 2012-13
For Appellant: Shri K. Sheshadri, CA &For Respondent: Shri D.K. Mishra, CIT – DR
Section 80PSection 80P(4)

section 80J.\nIn our view, since the expression of wider import, namely,\n"attributable to", has been used, the legislature intended to\ncover receipts from sources other than the actual conduct\nof the business of generation and distribution of\nelectricity.\"\n(emphasis supplied)\n17.3 Therefore, the word "attributable to" is certainly wider in\nimport than the expression "derived from". Whenever

THE KARNATAKA STATE CO-OPERATIVE AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK,BENGALURU vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-5(2)(1) , BANGALORE

ITA 1055/BANG/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore29 Apr 2024AY 2014-15
For Appellant: \nShri Bharadwaj SheshadriFor Respondent: \nShri D.K. Mishra, CIT – DR
Section 80PSection 80P(4)

section 80J.\nIn our view, since the expression of wider import, namely,\n"attributable to", has been used, the legislature intended to\ncover receipts from sources other than the actual conduct\nof the business of generation and distribution of\nelectricity."\n(emphasis supplied)\n17.3 Therefore, the word "attributable to" is certainly wider in\nimport than the expression "derived from". Whenever

THE KARNATAKA STATE CO-OPERATIVE AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK,BENGALURU vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD- 5(2)(1), BANGALORE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee stands partly\nallowed as indicated herinabove

ITA 1057/BANG/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore29 Apr 2024AY 2016-17
For Appellant: \nShri K. Sheshadri, CA &For Respondent: \nShri D.K. Mishra, CIT – DR
Section 80PSection 80P(4)

section 80J.\nIn our view, since the expression of wider import, namely,\n"attributable to", has been used, the legislature intended to\ncover receipts from sources other than the actual conduct\nof the business of generation and distribution of\nelectricity.\"\n(emphasis supplied)\n17.3 Therefore, the word "attributable to" is certainly wider in\nimport than the expression "derived from". Whenever

THE KARNATAKA STATE CO-OPERATIVE AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK,BENGALURU vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-5(2)(1), BANGALORE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee stands partly\nallowed as indicated herinabove

ITA 1053/BANG/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore29 Apr 2024AY 2013-14
For Appellant: Shri Bharadwaj SheshadriFor Respondent: Shri D.K. Mishra, CIT – DR
Section 80PSection 80P(4)

section 80J.\nIn our view, since the expression of wider import, namely,\n"attributable to", has been used, the legislature intended to\ncover receipts from sources other than the actual conduct\nof the business of generation and distribution of\nelectricity.\"\n(emphasis supplied)\n17.3 Therefore, the word "attributable to" is certainly wider in\nimport than the expression "derived from". Whenever

THE KARNATAKA STATE CO-OPERATIVE AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK,BENGALURU vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-5(2)(1), BANGALORE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee stands partly\nallowed as indicated herinabove

ITA 1059/BANG/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore29 Apr 2024AY 2018-19
For Appellant: \nShri K. Sheshadri, CA &For Respondent: \nShri D.K. Mishra, CIT – DR
Section 80PSection 80P(4)

section 80J.\nIn our view, since the expression of wider import, namely,\n"attributable to", has been used, the legislature intended to\ncover receipts from sources other than the actual conduct\nof the business of generation and distribution of\nelectricity."\n(emphasis supplied)\n17.3 Therefore, the word "attributable to" is certainly wider in\nimport than the expression "derived from". Whenever

THE KARNATAKA STATE CO-OPERATIVE AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK,BENGALURU vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-5(2)(1), BANGALORE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee stands partly\nallowed as indicated herinabove

ITA 1058/BANG/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore29 Apr 2024AY 2017-18
For Appellant: \nShri K. Sheshadri, CA &For Respondent: \nShri D.K. Mishra, CIT – DR
Section 80PSection 80P(4)

section 80J.\nIn our view, since the expression of wider import, namely,\n\"attributable to\", has been used, the legislature intended to\ncover receipts from sources other than the actual conduct\nof the business of generation and distribution of\nelectricity.\"\n(emphasis supplied)\n\n17.3 Therefore, the word "attributable to" is certainly wider in\nimport than the expression "derived from

JAMMANAHALLY PRATHAMIKA KRISHI PATTINA SAHAKARA SANGHA,BALLUPET vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2, HASSAN

In the result ITA No. 192/Bangalore/2025 filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 341/BANG/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore22 Dec 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi

For Appellant: Shri S.V. Ravishankar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Ganesh R. Ghale, Advocate, Standing Counsel
Section 143(3)Section 80

section-80J. In our view, since the expression of wider import, namely, "attributable to'', has been used, the legislature intended to cover receipts from sources other than the actual conduct of the business of generation and distribution of electricity.' 8. Therefore, the word "attributable to" is certainly wider in import than the expression "derived from". Whenever the legislature wanted

JAMMANAHALLY PRATHAMIKA KRISHI PATTINA SAHAKARA SANGHA,SAKLESHPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD -2, HASSAN

In the result ITA No. 192/Bangalore/2025 filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 192/BANG/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore22 Dec 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi

For Appellant: Shri S.V. Ravishankar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Ganesh R. Ghale, Advocate, Standing Counsel
Section 143(3)Section 80

section-80J. In our view, since the expression of wider import, namely, "attributable to'', has been used, the legislature intended to cover receipts from sources other than the actual conduct of the business of generation and distribution of electricity.' 8. Therefore, the word "attributable to" is certainly wider in import than the expression "derived from". Whenever the legislature wanted

PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL CREDIT CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY ,KODAGU vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BENGALURU -3, BENGALURU

In the result appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 1073/BANG/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore03 Feb 2026AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi & Shri Soundararajan K.Assessment Year : 2020-21

For Appellant: Shri Narendra Sharma, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Muthu Shankar, CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru
Section 142Section 143Section 263Section 80Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)

section-80J. In our view, since the expression of wider import, namely, "attributable to'', has been used, the legislature intended to cover receipts from sources other than the actual conduct of the business of generation and distribution of electricity.' 8. Therefore, the word "attributable to" is certainly wider in import than the expression "derived from". Whenever the legislature wanted