BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “transfer pricing”+ Section 260clear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka671Mumbai550Delhi470Bangalore143Kolkata91Chennai81Ahmedabad61Jaipur58Telangana53Hyderabad53Calcutta51Pune38Visakhapatnam25Lucknow18Chandigarh18SC14Cuttack10Varanasi9Indore9Rajkot8Rajasthan7Surat6Nagpur6Jodhpur5Agra5Orissa3Cochin2Amritsar2Andhra Pradesh1Jabalpur1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1Patna1

Key Topics

Section 26318Section 143(3)8Business Income2Revision u/s 2632

MAX FINANCIAL SERVICE LIMITED ,NAWANSHAHR vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -1, JALANDHAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is therefore partly allowed

ITA 121/ASR/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar31 Mar 2021AY 2015-16
For Appellant: Shri Deepak ChopraFor Respondent: Smt.Prabhjot Kaur, CIT
Section 143(3)Section 263

260 (SC)]. However, in case of slump sale which includes land/building where separate value is assigned to it under the relevant stamp duty legislation, the slump sale will not be adversely affected in the light of Explanation 2 to section 2(42C). (g) Transfer of assets without transfer of liabilities is not a slump sale.” 45. Referring to the same

POONAM MARWAHA,AMRITSAR vs. ACIT DCIT CEN CIR, AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeal filed by assessee is allowed

ITA 306/ASR/2024[2019-20]Status: Disposed
ITAT Amritsar
09 Jan 2025
AY 2019-20
Section 115BSection 143(3)Section 263Section 263(1)Section 69

transfer of long term securities (Penny stock shares) - Assessment year 2014-\n15 - Whether before exercise of power under section 263 it is Principal Commissioner\nwho has to apply its mind to issue and thereafter record reasons as to how twin conditions\nof order of Assessing Officer being erroneous and prejudicial to interest of revenue are\nsatisfied and then issue