MAX FINANCIAL SERVICE LIMITED ,NAWANSHAHR vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -1, JALANDHAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is therefore partly allowed

viib) of the Act were applicable to the facts of the case. The Ld.Counsel for the assessee, therefore, contended that it had been clearly demonstrated to the Ld. Pr.CIT that there was no error so as to cause prejudice to the Revenue in the order of the AO. 53 A.Y.2015-16 65. The Ld. DR, on the other hand, relied upon

M/S. KING ENTERTAINMENT PRIVATE LIMITED,NAWANSHAHR vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE - II, JALANDHAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed