SMT. SATYAWATI MARWAHA THROUGH LEGAL HEIR SH, CHANDER SHEIKHAR MARWAHA,JALANDHAR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JALANDHAR

In the result, the appeal for Asstt

Bench: Sh. Manoj Kumar Aggarwal & Sh. Udayan Dasgupta

144 r.w.s. 147 by recording incorrect facts/reasons and without complying with the mandatory conditions u/s 147 as envisaged under the Income Tax Act, 1961. 3. That having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, Hon'ble CIT(A) has erred in law and on facts in confirming the action of Ld. AO in framing the impugned assessment order

SMT. SATYAWATI MARWAHA THROUGH LEGAL HEIR SH. CHANDER SHEIKHAR MARWAHA,JALANDHAR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JALANDHAR

In the result, the appeal for Asstt

Bench: Sh. Manoj Kumar Aggarwal & Sh. Udayan Dasgupta

144 r.w.s. 147 by recording incorrect facts/reasons and without complying with the mandatory conditions u/s 147 as envisaged under the Income Tax Act, 1961. 3. That having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, Hon'ble CIT(A) has erred in law and on facts in confirming the action of Ld. AO in framing the impugned assessment order

KHURSHID AHMAD DAR,JAMMU AND KASHMIR, INDIA vs. ITO WARD, UDHAMPUR, UDHAMPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Dr. Mitha Lalmeena, Hon'Ble & Shri Udayan Das Gupta, Hon'Blekhurshid Ahmad Dar Vs. Ito, Ward, Nully Poshwari Turkawangam, Udhampur Shopia, 192305, Jammu & Kashmir, India.Pin 192305. Pan No. Awmpd5664K Assessee By Shri Rohit Kapoor, Adv. & Shri V.S. Aggarwal, Itp. Revenue By Mrs. Roshanta Kumari Meena, Cit Dr. Date Of Hearing 23.09.2025. Date Of Pronouncement To. [1 .2025. Order Dr. Mitha Lal Meena, A.M.:

144 r.w.s. 147 of the Act dated 10.11.2016 with respect to the Assessment Year 2017-18. 2. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal: 1. That the order passed under Section 250(6) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, by the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), is contrary to law and facts

IMRAN MAJEED,SRINAGAR vs. ITO WARD 1, SRINAGAR, SRINAGAR

In the result, the appeal for the Asstt

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Udayan Dasgupta

144 r.w.s 148. That that assumption of jurisdiction u/s 148 by the Ld. AO is in violation of mandatory jurisdictional conditions as stipulated under the Act. 4. That the notice u/s 148A(b) dated 22.03.2024 requiring the assessee to furnish reply by 29.03.2024 is bad in law since the time allowed to furnish reply is less than 7 days

IMRAN MAJEED,SRINAGAR vs. ITO, WARD 1, SRINAGAR, SRINAGAR

In the result, the appeal for the Asstt

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Udayan Dasgupta

144 r.w.s 148. That that assumption of jurisdiction u/s 148 by the Ld. AO is in violation of mandatory jurisdictional conditions as stipulated under the Act. 4. That the notice u/s 148A(b) dated 22.03.2024 requiring the assessee to furnish reply by 29.03.2024 is bad in law since the time allowed to furnish reply is less than 7 days

HARVINDER SINGH BULLAR,VPO RANJITGARH, MUKTSAR vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(2), MUKTSAR, MUKTSAR

Bench: Sh. Udayan Dasgupta & Sh. Krinwant Sahay

147 r.w. section 144 of the Act, dated 09.03.2023 deserves to be quashed as the above said proceedings have been initiated by the JAO, instead of Faceless 3 I.T.A. No. 573/Asr/2024 Harvinder Singh Bhullar v. ITO mode, as provided u/s 151A of the Act in view of the judgments of Hon'ble Punjab & Haryana High Court, High Court of Telangna

SH. NIRBHAY TREHAN,JAMMU vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, JAMMU

In the result, the appeals of the assessee bearing ITA Nos

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

144 of the Act. All three appeals are identical in nature under common factual backdropand alsoboth the assesses are in relation husband and wife. For the sake of convenience, we pass a common order for all three appeals. ITA No. 182/Asr/2019 is taken as a lead case. 2. Assessee has filed an application for condonation of delay of 02 days

SMT. BANI TREHAN,JAMMU vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, JAMMU

In the result, the appeals of the assessee bearing ITA Nos

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

144 of the Act. All three appeals are identical in nature under common factual backdropand alsoboth the assesses are in relation husband and wife. For the sake of convenience, we pass a common order for all three appeals. ITA No. 182/Asr/2019 is taken as a lead case. 2. Assessee has filed an application for condonation of delay of 02 days

SH. NIRBHAY TREHAN,JAMMU vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, JAMMU

In the result, the appeals of the assessee bearing ITA Nos

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

144 of the Act. All three appeals are identical in nature under common factual backdropand alsoboth the assesses are in relation husband and wife. For the sake of convenience, we pass a common order for all three appeals. ITA No. 182/Asr/2019 is taken as a lead case. 2. Assessee has filed an application for condonation of delay of 02 days

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-4(2), JALANDHAR, , CIVIL LINES vs. SH. BARJESH SINGHAL, MODERN COLONY

In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue is allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: Sh. Manoj Kumar Aggarwal & Sh. Udayan Dasgupta

144 of the Act, 1961 dated 30.03.2022. 2 I.T.A. No. 363/Asr/2024 Assessment Year: 2016-17 2. Grounds of appeal taken by the revenue in Form No. 36 are as follows: “(i) Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case the Ld. CIT(A) has erred to allow the appeal of the assessee and quashed the assessment u/s 147

JALALABAD SOLVEX PRIVATE LTD,JALALABAD vs. PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , AMRITSAR-1, PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Sh. Udayan Dasgupta & Sh. Krinwant Sahay

reassessment of proceedings read with section assessment filed by 147 the assessee 8 I.T.A. No. 117/Asr/2024 Jalalabad Solvex Pvt. Ltd. v. Pr. CIT iv 08-12- Notice under The assessee has 2021 section 142(1) filed the required information in the Notice under section 142(1) issued on 08- 12- reply dated 2021 asking for the information:- 02/01/2022 and 28/02/2022

M/S NARULA FOODS PRIVATE LIMITED,FEROZEPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and appeals of assessee are allowed in the terms indicated above

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

144 of the Act by the then AO as the assessee remained non-cooperative throughout the assessment proceedings. The I.T.A. Nos. 22/Asr/2020 19 &33 Others assessment was completed by the then AO after examining the appraisal report along with seized documents/material and issues emanating from the return of income filed by the assessee. The major issues involved in this case

M/S NARULA OIL & FATS PRIVATE LIMITED,AHEMDABAD vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and appeals of assessee are allowed in the terms indicated above

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

144 of the Act by the then AO as the assessee remained non-cooperative throughout the assessment proceedings. The I.T.A. Nos. 22/Asr/2020 19 &33 Others assessment was completed by the then AO after examining the appraisal report along with seized documents/material and issues emanating from the return of income filed by the assessee. The major issues involved in this case

MEASAGE NARULA SOLVEX PRIVATE LIMITED,MOGA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and appeals of assessee are allowed in the terms indicated above

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

144 of the Act by the then AO as the assessee remained non-cooperative throughout the assessment proceedings. The I.T.A. Nos. 22/Asr/2020 19 &33 Others assessment was completed by the then AO after examining the appraisal report along with seized documents/material and issues emanating from the return of income filed by the assessee. The major issues involved in this case

M/S NARULA OIL & FATS PRIVATE LIMITED,AHEMDABAD vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and appeals of assessee are allowed in the terms indicated above

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

144 of the Act by the then AO as the assessee remained non-cooperative throughout the assessment proceedings. The I.T.A. Nos. 22/Asr/2020 19 &33 Others assessment was completed by the then AO after examining the appraisal report along with seized documents/material and issues emanating from the return of income filed by the assessee. The major issues involved in this case

M/S NARULA OIL & FATS PRIVATE LIMITED,AHEMDABAD vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and appeals of assessee are allowed in the terms indicated above

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

144 of the Act by the then AO as the assessee remained non-cooperative throughout the assessment proceedings. The I.T.A. Nos. 22/Asr/2020 19 &33 Others assessment was completed by the then AO after examining the appraisal report along with seized documents/material and issues emanating from the return of income filed by the assessee. The major issues involved in this case

MEASAGE NARULA SOLVEX PRIVATE LIMITED,MOGA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE , AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and appeals of assessee are allowed in the terms indicated above

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

144 of the Act by the then AO as the assessee remained non-cooperative throughout the assessment proceedings. The I.T.A. Nos. 22/Asr/2020 19 &33 Others assessment was completed by the then AO after examining the appraisal report along with seized documents/material and issues emanating from the return of income filed by the assessee. The major issues involved in this case

MEASAGE SAT KARTAR SOLVEX PRIVATE LIMITED,FEROZEPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and appeals of assessee are allowed in the terms indicated above

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

144 of the Act by the then AO as the assessee remained non-cooperative throughout the assessment proceedings. The I.T.A. Nos. 22/Asr/2020 19 &33 Others assessment was completed by the then AO after examining the appraisal report along with seized documents/material and issues emanating from the return of income filed by the assessee. The major issues involved in this case