Search: penalty u/s 271

5 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 801clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 2744 Section 44A4 Addition to Income4 Section 271(1)(c)3 Section 271B3 Penalty3 Section 2712 TDS2

THE HALDHAR FOODS(P) LTD.,FEROZPUR CANTT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-III(5), FEROZPUR

In the result, the appeal i

ITA 59/ASR/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar20 Mar 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Sh. N.S.Saini & Sh. N.K.Choudhry

For Appellant: Sh. P.N. Arora (Ld. Adv.)For Respondent: Sh. Yashender Garg (Ld. DR)

Section 250(6)Section 271Section 271BSection 44A

271(B) of the I.T. Act, 1961 which is wrong, illegal and baseless because this the assessee has reasonable cause for not getting the books audited under section 44AB of the I.T. Act, 1961 in time due the reasons beyond his control. Since the assessee had reasonable cause for not getting the books of accounts audited hence penalty levied

THE HALDHAR FOODS(P) LTD.,FEROZPUR CANTT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-III(5), FEROZPUR

THE HALDHAR FOODS(P) LTD.,FEROZPUR CANTT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-III(5), FEROZPUR

MESERS MALWA MOTORS,BATHINDA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(3), BATHINDA

SH. AMRINDER SINGH DHIMAN,NAKODAR vs. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RANGE PHAGWARA, PHAGWARA

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JAMMU vs. M/S. JAMMU DEVELPMENT AUTHORITY,, JAMMU

M/S. JAMMU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,,JAMMU ( J&K) vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JAMMU