M/S. JAMMU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,JAMMU ( J&K) vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JAMMU
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the assessee's grounds of appeal related to general nature were dismissed as withdrawn. Regarding the agency commission, the Tribunal noted that the CIT(A) had dismissed the assessee's appeal on this issue. The Tribunal also addressed issues related to interest income and EPF deposits, allowing one ground for the assessee and dismissing another for the revenue.
What were the facts?
The assessee, Jammu Development Authority, appealed against an addition made by the Assessing Officer (AO) on account of agency commission. The AO had added a notional commission on works executed by the assessee for other departments, including state and central plan works, which the assessee argued were grants and not subject to commission.
What were the issues?
Whether agency commission can be charged on grants-in-aid and whether late deposit of employee's EPF contribution disallows deduction.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(5)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- National Thermal Power Co. Ltd. v. CIT5,834 citing229 ITR 383 · 1998 · SC
- CIT v. B.C. Srinivasa Setty628 citing128 ITR 294 · 1981 · SC
- Ahmedabad Electricity Co. Ltd. v. CIT441 citing199 ITR 351 · 1993 · HC
- Mysore Minerals Ltd. v. CIT215 citing239 ITR 775 · 1999 · SC
- R.B. Jodha Mal Kuthiala v. CIT131 citing82 ITR 570 · 1971 · SC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AMRITSAR BENCH, AMRITSAR
Before: Sh. N. S. Saini & Sh. N. K. Choudhry
Per N. S. Saini, Accountant Member:
These are the cross appeals filed by the assessee and Revenue against the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) dated 06.05.2013, Jammu.
The assessee has filed modified grounds of appeal and submitted that the same may be adjudicated by the Tribunal in place of the original grounds of appeal filed with the appeal memo.
ITA Nos. 494 & 498/Asr./2013 2 Jammu Development Authority
The ld. Departme
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 36(1)(va)
- Vco Consulatatns and Sevices Private… vs ITO, Corporate Ward 3(3), ChennaiITA 2145/CHNY/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- R K Swamy Limited, Chennai vs DCIT Non Corporate Circle 10(1), ChennaiITA 504/CHNY/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- M/S. R.K. Swamy Ltd., Chennai vs DCIT, Ncc-10(1), ChennaiITA 2822/CHNY/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Rajesh Maru, Mhow vs ITO-5(1), IndoreITA 839/IND/2025[2023-2024]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2023-2024
- Rajesh Maru, Mhow vs ITO-5(1), IndoreITA 838/IND/2025[2022-2023]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2022-2023
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Chandan Kumar Bathual vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Cuttack-Iii Range, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Manoranjan Sadangi vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Gopalpur Range, GanjamOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Bijaya Kumar Parekh vs. State Tax Officer, CT And GST Balangir Circle, BalangirOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Puspanjali Bhuyan vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S A2Z Infra Engineering LTD vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026