Search: penalty u/s 271

19 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 58clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 80I23 Section 271(1)(c)21 Addition to Income19 Deduction16 Section 143(3)14 Section 27412 Depreciation11 Disallowance11 Section 250

MESERS MALWA MOTORS,BATHINDA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(3), BATHINDA

In the result, the assessee’s appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 131/ASR/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar27 Jun 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Sh. Sanjay Arorai.T.A. No. 131/Asr/2018 Assessment Year: 2012-13

For Appellant: Sh. P. N. Arora (Adv.)For Respondent: Sh. Charan Dass (D.R.)

Section 143(3)Section 271(1)(c)Section 274

58,548. The same found endorsement in first appeal by the ld. CIT(A). The assessee had been unable to discharge the onus on it under Explanation 1 to sec. 271(1)(c). The plea as to the addition being agreed to, so that it would save penalty, did not find acceptance; the law in the matter having been clarified

MESERS MALWA MOTORS,BATHINDA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(3), BATHINDA

THE BANGA COOPERATIVE MARKETING SOCIETY LIMITED,BANGA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, NAWANSHAHAR

MESERS MALWA MOTORS,BATHINDA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(3), BATHINDA

THE BANGA COOPERATIVE MARKETING SOCIETY LIMITED,BANGA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, NAWANSHAHAR

THE BANGA COOPERATIVE MARKETING SOCIETY LIMITED,BANGA vs. INCOME TAX OFICER,NAWANSHAHAR, NAWANSHAHAR

THE BANGA COOPERATIVE MARKETING SOCIETY LIMITED,BANGA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, NAWANSHAHAR

THE BANGA COOPERATIVE MARKETING SOCIETY LIMITED,BANGA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER , NAWANSHAHAR

V R A COTTON MILLS.,ABOHAR vs. DY.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , BATHINDA

THE DY.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, JAMMU vs. M/S FILL INDUSTRIES,, SRINAGAR

THE DY.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, JAMMU vs. M/S FILL INDUSTRIES,, SRINAGAR

THE DY.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, JAMMU vs. M/S FIL INDUSTRIES,, SRINAGAR

THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JAMMU vs. M/S. FIL INDUSTRIES LTD, SRINAGAR

THE DY.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, JAMMU vs. M/S FIL INDUSTRIES,, SRINAGAR

THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JAMMU vs. M/S. FIL INDUSTRIES LTD, SRINAGAR

M/S FIL INDUSTRIES LTD,SRINAGAR vs. THE ADDL. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, SRINAGAR

THE DY.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, JAMMU vs. M/S FILL INDUSTRIES,, SRINAGAR

THE DY.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, JAMMU vs. M/S FIL INDUSTRIES,, SRINAGAR

M/S FIL INDUSTRIES LTD,SRINAGAR vs. THE DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, SRINAGAR

M/S NICE TELECOM,MANSA vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(4), MANSA

M/S. JAMMU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,,JAMMU ( J&K) vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JAMMU

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JAMMU vs. M/S. JAMMU DEVELPMENT AUTHORITY,, JAMMU