BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

18 results for “disallowance”+ Section 255(4)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai743Delhi685Bangalore241Chennai206Kolkata144Ahmedabad121Jaipur113Chandigarh90Raipur70Hyderabad69Pune65Cochin44Indore42Surat41Calcutta36Guwahati35Panaji34Karnataka27Allahabad22Rajkot22Amritsar18Visakhapatnam17Lucknow14Cuttack13Jodhpur12Nagpur11Telangana5Jabalpur5SC4Dehradun3Varanasi3Orissa2Ranchi2Agra2Patna2Rajasthan1Punjab & Haryana1

Key Topics

Section 80I27Section 143(3)20Addition to Income17Section 115J15Disallowance15Deduction12Section 25011Depreciation11Section 3210Section 43(1)

M/S P. RAM CHAND & COMPANY,JALANDHAR vs. DEPUTY/ ASSSISTANAT COMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-1, JALANDHAR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessees are allowed

ITA 79/ASR/2021[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar10 Nov 2021AY 2019-20

Bench: Due Date Of Filing Of Income Tax Return.

For Appellant: Shri Vikas Bhagat,CAFor Respondent: Shri S.M. Surendranath, Sr. DR
Section 139(1)Section 36(1)(va)

255/- made by the A.O. on account of late payments towards EPF and ESI under section 36(1)(va) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short the ‘Act’), however, before furnishing the return of income under section 139(1) of the Act. When the matter was taken to the Ld. CIT(A) the said disallowance was sustained. 4

THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JAMMU vs. M/S. FIL INDUSTRIES LTD, SRINAGAR

In the result appeal of the assessee ground no 4 to 4

10
Section 685
Section 36(1)(iii)4
ITA 470/ASR/2015[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar24 Feb 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 32Section 43(1)Section 80I

Disallowance on account of depreciation claimed in respect of Capital Subsidy 19. The ld. counsel vehemently argued and relied on the submission. We consider the assessee’s submission of the relevant pages 4 to 9 are reproduced as under: I.T.A. Nos.288 to 294/Asr/2015 47 “1.7 It is submitted that perusal of the aforesaid explanation would show that where a portion

THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JAMMU vs. M/S. FIL INDUSTRIES LTD, SRINAGAR

In the result appeal of the assessee ground no 4 to 4

ITA 471/ASR/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar24 Feb 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 32Section 43(1)Section 80I

Disallowance on account of depreciation claimed in respect of Capital Subsidy 19. The ld. counsel vehemently argued and relied on the submission. We consider the assessee’s submission of the relevant pages 4 to 9 are reproduced as under: I.T.A. Nos.288 to 294/Asr/2015 47 “1.7 It is submitted that perusal of the aforesaid explanation would show that where a portion

M/S FIL INDUSTRIES LTD,SRINAGAR vs. THE ADDL. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, SRINAGAR

In the result appeal of the assessee ground no 4 to 4

ITA 255/ASR/2015[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar24 Feb 2023AY 2008-09

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 32Section 43(1)Section 80I

Disallowance on account of depreciation claimed in respect of Capital Subsidy 19. The ld. counsel vehemently argued and relied on the submission. We consider the assessee’s submission of the relevant pages 4 to 9 are reproduced as under: I.T.A. Nos.288 to 294/Asr/2015 47 “1.7 It is submitted that perusal of the aforesaid explanation would show that where a portion

THE DY.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, JAMMU vs. M/S FILL INDUSTRIES,, SRINAGAR

In the result appeal of the assessee ground no 4 to 4

ITA 290/ASR/2015[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar24 Feb 2023AY 2003-04

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 32Section 43(1)Section 80I

Disallowance on account of depreciation claimed in respect of Capital Subsidy 19. The ld. counsel vehemently argued and relied on the submission. We consider the assessee’s submission of the relevant pages 4 to 9 are reproduced as under: I.T.A. Nos.288 to 294/Asr/2015 47 “1.7 It is submitted that perusal of the aforesaid explanation would show that where a portion

THE DY.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, JAMMU vs. M/S FIL INDUSTRIES,, SRINAGAR

In the result appeal of the assessee ground no 4 to 4

ITA 292/ASR/2015[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar24 Feb 2023AY 2006-07

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 32Section 43(1)Section 80I

Disallowance on account of depreciation claimed in respect of Capital Subsidy 19. The ld. counsel vehemently argued and relied on the submission. We consider the assessee’s submission of the relevant pages 4 to 9 are reproduced as under: I.T.A. Nos.288 to 294/Asr/2015 47 “1.7 It is submitted that perusal of the aforesaid explanation would show that where a portion

M/S FIL INDUSTRIES LTD,SRINAGAR vs. THE DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, SRINAGAR

In the result appeal of the assessee ground no 4 to 4

ITA 417/ASR/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar24 Feb 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 32Section 43(1)Section 80I

Disallowance on account of depreciation claimed in respect of Capital Subsidy 19. The ld. counsel vehemently argued and relied on the submission. We consider the assessee’s submission of the relevant pages 4 to 9 are reproduced as under: I.T.A. Nos.288 to 294/Asr/2015 47 “1.7 It is submitted that perusal of the aforesaid explanation would show that where a portion

THE DY.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, JAMMU vs. M/S FILL INDUSTRIES,, SRINAGAR

In the result appeal of the assessee ground no 4 to 4

ITA 291/ASR/2015[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar24 Feb 2023AY 2004-05

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 32Section 43(1)Section 80I

Disallowance on account of depreciation claimed in respect of Capital Subsidy 19. The ld. counsel vehemently argued and relied on the submission. We consider the assessee’s submission of the relevant pages 4 to 9 are reproduced as under: I.T.A. Nos.288 to 294/Asr/2015 47 “1.7 It is submitted that perusal of the aforesaid explanation would show that where a portion

THE DY.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, JAMMU vs. M/S FILL INDUSTRIES,, SRINAGAR

In the result appeal of the assessee ground no 4 to 4

ITA 289/ASR/2015[2002-03]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar24 Feb 2023AY 2002-03

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 32Section 43(1)Section 80I

Disallowance on account of depreciation claimed in respect of Capital Subsidy 19. The ld. counsel vehemently argued and relied on the submission. We consider the assessee’s submission of the relevant pages 4 to 9 are reproduced as under: I.T.A. Nos.288 to 294/Asr/2015 47 “1.7 It is submitted that perusal of the aforesaid explanation would show that where a portion

THE DY.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, JAMMU vs. M/S FIL INDUSTRIES,, SRINAGAR

In the result appeal of the assessee ground no 4 to 4

ITA 293/ASR/2015[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar24 Feb 2023AY 2007-08

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 32Section 43(1)Section 80I

Disallowance on account of depreciation claimed in respect of Capital Subsidy 19. The ld. counsel vehemently argued and relied on the submission. We consider the assessee’s submission of the relevant pages 4 to 9 are reproduced as under: I.T.A. Nos.288 to 294/Asr/2015 47 “1.7 It is submitted that perusal of the aforesaid explanation would show that where a portion

THE DY.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, JAMMU vs. M/S FIL INDUSTRIES,, SRINAGAR

In the result appeal of the assessee ground no 4 to 4

ITA 294/ASR/2015[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar24 Feb 2023AY 2008-09

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 32Section 43(1)Section 80I

Disallowance on account of depreciation claimed in respect of Capital Subsidy 19. The ld. counsel vehemently argued and relied on the submission. We consider the assessee’s submission of the relevant pages 4 to 9 are reproduced as under: I.T.A. Nos.288 to 294/Asr/2015 47 “1.7 It is submitted that perusal of the aforesaid explanation would show that where a portion

UNIVERSAL BIOMASS ENERGY PRIVATE LIMITED,GURUHARSAHAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-3(1), FEROZEPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 267/ASR/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar24 Jun 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Sh. Udayan Dasgupta & Sh. Brajesh Kumar Singh

Section 139(1)Section 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 246ASection 250Section 80I

255 ITR 458 (P & H) to submit that the Hon’ble High Court has examined this issue and has observed that the intimation u/s 143(1) is given without prejudice to the sub section (2) which makes the position clear that even when intimation u/s 143(1) has been issued, proceedings for assessment u/s 143(3) can be issued

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, SRINAGAR, KASHMIR vs. JAMMU AND KASHMIR POWER DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD., SRINAGAR, KASHMIR

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the revenue are dismissed being

ITA 385/ASR/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar15 May 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Sh. Udayan Dasgupta & Sh. Krinwant Sahay

For Appellant: Sh. Dalip K Kaul, C. A
Section 115JSection 135Section 143(3)Section 250(6)Section 37(2)

4 I.T.A. Nos. 364, 385 & 386/Asr/2023 Assessment Years: 2016-17 to 2018-19 increased (or added back) to arrive at the correct profits for the purpose of computation of MAT under section 115JB . He further observed that in the instant case since the provisions has been made on estimation ( as per provisions of the Companies Act 13) , and in absence

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, THE CHINARS, NEAR GOVT. SILK FACTORY, RAJBAGH , SRINAGAR vs. JAMMU AND KASHMIR POWER DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD., SRINAGAR, KASHMIR

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the revenue are dismissed being

ITA 386/ASR/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar15 May 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Sh. Udayan Dasgupta & Sh. Krinwant Sahay

For Appellant: Sh. Dalip K Kaul, C. A
Section 115JSection 135Section 143(3)Section 250(6)Section 37(2)

4 I.T.A. Nos. 364, 385 & 386/Asr/2023 Assessment Years: 2016-17 to 2018-19 increased (or added back) to arrive at the correct profits for the purpose of computation of MAT under section 115JB . He further observed that in the instant case since the provisions has been made on estimation ( as per provisions of the Companies Act 13) , and in absence

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE- SRINAGAR, RAJBAGH SRINGAR vs. JAMMU AND KASHMIR POWER DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD., SRINAGAR, KASHMIR

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the revenue are dismissed being

ITA 364/ASR/2023[2016-2017]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar15 May 2025AY 2016-2017

Bench: Sh. Udayan Dasgupta & Sh. Krinwant Sahay

For Appellant: Sh. Dalip K Kaul, C. A
Section 115JSection 135Section 143(3)Section 250(6)Section 37(2)

4 I.T.A. Nos. 364, 385 & 386/Asr/2023 Assessment Years: 2016-17 to 2018-19 increased (or added back) to arrive at the correct profits for the purpose of computation of MAT under section 115JB . He further observed that in the instant case since the provisions has been made on estimation ( as per provisions of the Companies Act 13) , and in absence

SURYA AUTOMOBILES PVT .LTD.,ABOHAR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-II, BATHINDA

In the result, the assessee’s appeals are allowed

ITA 93/ASR/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar08 Apr 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: Sh. Sanjay Arora & Sh. N. K. Choudhryi. T. A. Nos. 92 & 93/(Asr)/2018 Assessment Years: 2013-14 & 2014-15

For Appellant: Sh. P. N. Arora (Adv.)For Respondent: Sh. Charan Dass (D.R.)
Section 143(3)Section 36(1)(iii)

section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ('the Act' hereinafter) dated 27.01.2016 and 23.09.2016 respectively. 2. The appeals raising common issue/s, were posted for hearing and, accordingly, heard together. The same are also being disposed of per a common order for the sake of convenience. (AYs 2013-14 & 2014-15) Surya Automobiles Pvt. Ltd. v. Asstt

SURYA AUTOMOBILES PVT LTD,ABOHAR vs. ASSIATANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE-II, BATHINDA

In the result, the assessee’s appeals are allowed

ITA 92/ASR/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar08 Apr 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Sh. Sanjay Arora & Sh. N. K. Choudhryi. T. A. Nos. 92 & 93/(Asr)/2018 Assessment Years: 2013-14 & 2014-15

For Appellant: Sh. P. N. Arora (Adv.)For Respondent: Sh. Charan Dass (D.R.)
Section 143(3)Section 36(1)(iii)

section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ('the Act' hereinafter) dated 27.01.2016 and 23.09.2016 respectively. 2. The appeals raising common issue/s, were posted for hearing and, accordingly, heard together. The same are also being disposed of per a common order for the sake of convenience. (AYs 2013-14 & 2014-15) Surya Automobiles Pvt. Ltd. v. Asstt

M/S. AMAN TRADING CORP.,JAMMU vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, JAMMU

In the result, the assessee’s appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 255/ASR/2013[1997-98]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar16 Jan 2019AY 1997-98

Bench: Sh. Sanjay Arora & Sh. N. K. Choudhryi.T.A. No. 255/(Asr)/2013 Assessment Year: 1997-98

For Appellant: Sh. Inderjit Paul (Adv.)For Respondent: Sh. Charan Dass (D.R.)
Section 143(3)Section 144Section 184(2)Section 420Section 68

255/(Asr)/2013 Assessment Year: 1997-98 Aman Trading Corporation, vs. Income Tax Officer, 6-Ranbir Market, Jammu W-2(2), Jammu [PAN: AAMFA 5704F] (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by : Sh. Inderjit Paul (Adv.) Respondent by: Sh. Charan Dass (D.R.) Date of Hearing: 03.12.2018 Date of Pronouncement: 16.01.2019 ORDER Per Sanjay Arora, AM: This is an Appeal by the Assessee directed