BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

44 results for “depreciation”+ Section 144clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai704Delhi477Bangalore170Kolkata126Chennai113Ahmedabad105Jaipur98Hyderabad63Pune56Raipur46Amritsar44Rajkot27Lucknow27Chandigarh25Cochin24Indore20Visakhapatnam15Surat14SC10Cuttack9Jodhpur9Nagpur7Panaji6Patna5Agra3Jabalpur3Telangana2D.K. JAIN H.L. DATTU JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR1Calcutta1Punjab & Haryana1Guwahati1Karnataka1Dehradun1

Key Topics

Section 14466Depreciation43Disallowance43Addition to Income43Natural Justice34Section 250(6)33Section 80I20Deduction11Section 25010Section 143(3)

THE DY.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, JAMMU vs. M/S FILL INDUSTRIES,, SRINAGAR

In the result appeal of the assessee ground no 4 to 4

ITA 290/ASR/2015[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar24 Feb 2023AY 2003-04

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 32Section 43(1)Section 80I

depreciation considering the nature of assets. The issue was already covered by the order of assessee’s own case in ITAT-Amritsar Bench, ITA No-415/Asr/2009 date of pronouncement 27/06/2012 in paragraph no 22. We relied on the order of coordinate bench &upheld the order of the ld. CIT(A). I.T.A. Nos.288 to 294/Asr/2015 38 15.1. In the result

THE DY.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, JAMMU vs. M/S FILL INDUSTRIES,, SRINAGAR

In the result appeal of the assessee ground no 4 to 4

Showing 1–20 of 44 · Page 1 of 3

10
Section 3210
Section 43(1)10
ITA 289/ASR/2015[2002-03]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar24 Feb 2023AY 2002-03

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 32Section 43(1)Section 80I

depreciation considering the nature of assets. The issue was already covered by the order of assessee’s own case in ITAT-Amritsar Bench, ITA No-415/Asr/2009 date of pronouncement 27/06/2012 in paragraph no 22. We relied on the order of coordinate bench &upheld the order of the ld. CIT(A). I.T.A. Nos.288 to 294/Asr/2015 38 15.1. In the result

THE DY.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, JAMMU vs. M/S FIL INDUSTRIES,, SRINAGAR

In the result appeal of the assessee ground no 4 to 4

ITA 292/ASR/2015[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar24 Feb 2023AY 2006-07

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 32Section 43(1)Section 80I

depreciation considering the nature of assets. The issue was already covered by the order of assessee’s own case in ITAT-Amritsar Bench, ITA No-415/Asr/2009 date of pronouncement 27/06/2012 in paragraph no 22. We relied on the order of coordinate bench &upheld the order of the ld. CIT(A). I.T.A. Nos.288 to 294/Asr/2015 38 15.1. In the result

THE DY.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, JAMMU vs. M/S FIL INDUSTRIES,, SRINAGAR

In the result appeal of the assessee ground no 4 to 4

ITA 293/ASR/2015[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar24 Feb 2023AY 2007-08

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 32Section 43(1)Section 80I

depreciation considering the nature of assets. The issue was already covered by the order of assessee’s own case in ITAT-Amritsar Bench, ITA No-415/Asr/2009 date of pronouncement 27/06/2012 in paragraph no 22. We relied on the order of coordinate bench &upheld the order of the ld. CIT(A). I.T.A. Nos.288 to 294/Asr/2015 38 15.1. In the result

THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JAMMU vs. M/S. FIL INDUSTRIES LTD, SRINAGAR

In the result appeal of the assessee ground no 4 to 4

ITA 470/ASR/2015[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar24 Feb 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 32Section 43(1)Section 80I

depreciation considering the nature of assets. The issue was already covered by the order of assessee’s own case in ITAT-Amritsar Bench, ITA No-415/Asr/2009 date of pronouncement 27/06/2012 in paragraph no 22. We relied on the order of coordinate bench &upheld the order of the ld. CIT(A). I.T.A. Nos.288 to 294/Asr/2015 38 15.1. In the result

THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JAMMU vs. M/S. FIL INDUSTRIES LTD, SRINAGAR

In the result appeal of the assessee ground no 4 to 4

ITA 471/ASR/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar24 Feb 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 32Section 43(1)Section 80I

depreciation considering the nature of assets. The issue was already covered by the order of assessee’s own case in ITAT-Amritsar Bench, ITA No-415/Asr/2009 date of pronouncement 27/06/2012 in paragraph no 22. We relied on the order of coordinate bench &upheld the order of the ld. CIT(A). I.T.A. Nos.288 to 294/Asr/2015 38 15.1. In the result

M/S FIL INDUSTRIES LTD,SRINAGAR vs. THE ADDL. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, SRINAGAR

In the result appeal of the assessee ground no 4 to 4

ITA 255/ASR/2015[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar24 Feb 2023AY 2008-09

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 32Section 43(1)Section 80I

depreciation considering the nature of assets. The issue was already covered by the order of assessee’s own case in ITAT-Amritsar Bench, ITA No-415/Asr/2009 date of pronouncement 27/06/2012 in paragraph no 22. We relied on the order of coordinate bench &upheld the order of the ld. CIT(A). I.T.A. Nos.288 to 294/Asr/2015 38 15.1. In the result

THE DY.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, JAMMU vs. M/S FILL INDUSTRIES,, SRINAGAR

In the result appeal of the assessee ground no 4 to 4

ITA 291/ASR/2015[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar24 Feb 2023AY 2004-05

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 32Section 43(1)Section 80I

depreciation considering the nature of assets. The issue was already covered by the order of assessee’s own case in ITAT-Amritsar Bench, ITA No-415/Asr/2009 date of pronouncement 27/06/2012 in paragraph no 22. We relied on the order of coordinate bench &upheld the order of the ld. CIT(A). I.T.A. Nos.288 to 294/Asr/2015 38 15.1. In the result

THE DY.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, JAMMU vs. M/S FIL INDUSTRIES,, SRINAGAR

In the result appeal of the assessee ground no 4 to 4

ITA 294/ASR/2015[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar24 Feb 2023AY 2008-09

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 32Section 43(1)Section 80I

depreciation considering the nature of assets. The issue was already covered by the order of assessee’s own case in ITAT-Amritsar Bench, ITA No-415/Asr/2009 date of pronouncement 27/06/2012 in paragraph no 22. We relied on the order of coordinate bench &upheld the order of the ld. CIT(A). I.T.A. Nos.288 to 294/Asr/2015 38 15.1. In the result

M/S FIL INDUSTRIES LTD,SRINAGAR vs. THE DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, SRINAGAR

In the result appeal of the assessee ground no 4 to 4

ITA 417/ASR/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar24 Feb 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 32Section 43(1)Section 80I

depreciation considering the nature of assets. The issue was already covered by the order of assessee’s own case in ITAT-Amritsar Bench, ITA No-415/Asr/2009 date of pronouncement 27/06/2012 in paragraph no 22. We relied on the order of coordinate bench &upheld the order of the ld. CIT(A). I.T.A. Nos.288 to 294/Asr/2015 38 15.1. In the result

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, AMRITSAR vs. M/S NARULA OIL & FATS PRIVATE LIMITED, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and appeals of assessee are allowed in the terms indicated above

ITA 58/ASR/2020[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar09 Jun 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 144Section 250(6)

144 r.w.s 153A of the Act which is bad in law and against the facts and circumstances of the case and is not sustainable on various legal and factual grounds. 3. That having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, Hon’ble CIT(A) has erred in law and on facts in partly confirming the action

M/S NARULA OIL & FATS PRIVATE LIMITED,AHEMDABAD vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and appeals of assessee are allowed in the terms indicated above

ITA 67/ASR/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar09 Jun 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 144Section 250(6)

144 r.w.s 153A of the Act which is bad in law and against the facts and circumstances of the case and is not sustainable on various legal and factual grounds. 3. That having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, Hon’ble CIT(A) has erred in law and on facts in partly confirming the action

M/S NARULA FOODS PRIVATE LIMITED,FEROZEPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and appeals of assessee are allowed in the terms indicated above

ITA 75/ASR/2020[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar09 Jun 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 144Section 250(6)

144 r.w.s 153A of the Act which is bad in law and against the facts and circumstances of the case and is not sustainable on various legal and factual grounds. 3. That having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, Hon’ble CIT(A) has erred in law and on facts in partly confirming the action

M/S NARULA FOODS PRIVATE LIMITED,FEROZEPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and appeals of assessee are allowed in the terms indicated above

ITA 76/ASR/2020[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar09 Jun 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 144Section 250(6)

144 r.w.s 153A of the Act which is bad in law and against the facts and circumstances of the case and is not sustainable on various legal and factual grounds. 3. That having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, Hon’ble CIT(A) has erred in law and on facts in partly confirming the action

M/S NARULA OIL & FATS PRIVATE LIMITED,AHEMDABAD vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and appeals of assessee are allowed in the terms indicated above

ITA 66/ASR/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar09 Jun 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 144Section 250(6)

144 r.w.s 153A of the Act which is bad in law and against the facts and circumstances of the case and is not sustainable on various legal and factual grounds. 3. That having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, Hon’ble CIT(A) has erred in law and on facts in partly confirming the action

MEASAGE NARULA SOLVEX PRIVATE LIMITED,MOGA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and appeals of assessee are allowed in the terms indicated above

ITA 34/ASR/2020[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar09 Jun 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 144Section 250(6)

144 r.w.s 153A of the Act which is bad in law and against the facts and circumstances of the case and is not sustainable on various legal and factual grounds. 3. That having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, Hon’ble CIT(A) has erred in law and on facts in partly confirming the action

MEASAGE SAT KARTAR SOLVEX PRIVATE LIMITED,FEROZEPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and appeals of assessee are allowed in the terms indicated above

ITA 26/ASR/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar09 Jun 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 144Section 250(6)

144 r.w.s 153A of the Act which is bad in law and against the facts and circumstances of the case and is not sustainable on various legal and factual grounds. 3. That having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, Hon’ble CIT(A) has erred in law and on facts in partly confirming the action

M/S NARULA OIL & FATS PRIVATE LIMITED,AHEMDABAD vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and appeals of assessee are allowed in the terms indicated above

ITA 65/ASR/2020[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar09 Jun 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 144Section 250(6)

144 r.w.s 153A of the Act which is bad in law and against the facts and circumstances of the case and is not sustainable on various legal and factual grounds. 3. That having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, Hon’ble CIT(A) has erred in law and on facts in partly confirming the action

MEASAGE SAT KARTAR SOLVEX PRIVATE LIMITED,FEROZEPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and appeals of assessee are allowed in the terms indicated above

ITA 16/ASR/2020[2001-12]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar09 Jun 2023AY 2001-12

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 144Section 250(6)

144 r.w.s 153A of the Act which is bad in law and against the facts and circumstances of the case and is not sustainable on various legal and factual grounds. 3. That having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, Hon’ble CIT(A) has erred in law and on facts in partly confirming the action

M/S NARULA OIL & FATS PRIVATE LIMITED,AHEMDABAD vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and appeals of assessee are allowed in the terms indicated above

ITA 64/ASR/2020[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar09 Jun 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 144Section 250(6)

144 r.w.s 153A of the Act which is bad in law and against the facts and circumstances of the case and is not sustainable on various legal and factual grounds. 3. That having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, Hon’ble CIT(A) has erred in law and on facts in partly confirming the action