BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

56 results for “depreciation”+ Section 144clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai813Delhi582Bangalore193Kolkata193Ahmedabad162Chennai157Jaipur135Hyderabad77Pune67Chandigarh57Amritsar56Raipur55Visakhapatnam46Cuttack40Indore36Cochin35Rajkot27Surat26Nagpur25Lucknow25Karnataka23Agra18Guwahati15Jodhpur11Patna10SC10Panaji7Telangana7Ranchi6Dehradun5Jabalpur4Calcutta3Varanasi2Punjab & Haryana2Allahabad1D.K. JAIN H.L. DATTU JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR1

Key Topics

Section 14473Addition to Income51Depreciation48Disallowance47Natural Justice35Section 250(6)34Section 26323Section 80I20Section 143(3)19Deduction

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JAMMU vs. M/S. JAMMU DEVELPMENT AUTHORITY,, JAMMU

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes and the appeal of the department is dismissed

ITA 494/ASR/2013[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar20 Mar 2019AY 2005-06

Bench: Sh. N. S. Saini & Sh. N. K. Choudhryita No. 498/Asr./2013 : Asstt. Year : 2005-06 Jammu Development Authority, Vs Dy. Commissioner Of Income Vikas Bhawan, Rail Head Tax, Circle-I, Complex, Jammu, J & K Jammu (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aadfj7335A Ita No. 494/Asr./2013 : Asstt. Year : 2005-06 Dy. Commissioner Of Income Vs Jammu Development Authority, Tax, Circle-I, Vikas Bhawan, Rail Head Jammu Complex, Jammu, J & K (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aabcp1720E Assessee By : Shri. R. K. Gupta, Ca & Shri. Vasu Gupta, Ca Revenue By : Shri. M. P. Singh, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing :21.02.2019 Date Of Pronouncement : 22.03.2019 Order Per N. S. Saini: These Are The Cross Appeals Filed By The Assessee & Revenue Against The Order Of Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) Dated 06.05.2013, Jammu.

For Appellant: Shri. R. K. Gupta, CA &For Respondent: Shri. M. P. Singh, CIT DR

144 read with section 145(3) may not be made.” In response to this query the assessee has filed reply on 24.12.2007 which is reproduced as under: “As the authority is not indulging purchase and sale of land, the details cannot be furnished and ITA Nos. 494 & 498/Asr./2013 12 Jammu Development Authority no land is in the name

Showing 1–20 of 56 · Page 1 of 3

16
Section 25014
Section 3210

M/S. JAMMU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,,JAMMU ( J&K) vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JAMMU

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes and the appeal of the department is dismissed

ITA 498/ASR/2013[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar20 Mar 2019AY 2005-06

Bench: Sh. N. S. Saini & Sh. N. K. Choudhryita No. 498/Asr./2013 : Asstt. Year : 2005-06 Jammu Development Authority, Vs Dy. Commissioner Of Income Vikas Bhawan, Rail Head Tax, Circle-I, Complex, Jammu, J & K Jammu (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aadfj7335A Ita No. 494/Asr./2013 : Asstt. Year : 2005-06 Dy. Commissioner Of Income Vs Jammu Development Authority, Tax, Circle-I, Vikas Bhawan, Rail Head Jammu Complex, Jammu, J & K (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aabcp1720E Assessee By : Shri. R. K. Gupta, Ca & Shri. Vasu Gupta, Ca Revenue By : Shri. M. P. Singh, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing :21.02.2019 Date Of Pronouncement : 22.03.2019 Order Per N. S. Saini: These Are The Cross Appeals Filed By The Assessee & Revenue Against The Order Of Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) Dated 06.05.2013, Jammu.

For Appellant: Shri. R. K. Gupta, CA &For Respondent: Shri. M. P. Singh, CIT DR

144 read with section 145(3) may not be made.” In response to this query the assessee has filed reply on 24.12.2007 which is reproduced as under: “As the authority is not indulging purchase and sale of land, the details cannot be furnished and ITA Nos. 494 & 498/Asr./2013 12 Jammu Development Authority no land is in the name

THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JAMMU vs. M/S. FIL INDUSTRIES LTD, SRINAGAR

In the result appeal of the assessee ground no 4 to 4

ITA 471/ASR/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar24 Feb 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 32Section 43(1)Section 80I

depreciation considering the nature of assets. The issue was already covered by the order of assessee’s own case in ITAT-Amritsar Bench, ITA No-415/Asr/2009 date of pronouncement 27/06/2012 in paragraph no 22. We relied on the order of coordinate bench &upheld the order of the ld. CIT(A). I.T.A. Nos.288 to 294/Asr/2015 38 15.1. In the result

THE DY.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, JAMMU vs. M/S FIL INDUSTRIES,, SRINAGAR

In the result appeal of the assessee ground no 4 to 4

ITA 294/ASR/2015[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar24 Feb 2023AY 2008-09

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 32Section 43(1)Section 80I

depreciation considering the nature of assets. The issue was already covered by the order of assessee’s own case in ITAT-Amritsar Bench, ITA No-415/Asr/2009 date of pronouncement 27/06/2012 in paragraph no 22. We relied on the order of coordinate bench &upheld the order of the ld. CIT(A). I.T.A. Nos.288 to 294/Asr/2015 38 15.1. In the result

THE DY.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, JAMMU vs. M/S FIL INDUSTRIES,, SRINAGAR

In the result appeal of the assessee ground no 4 to 4

ITA 292/ASR/2015[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar24 Feb 2023AY 2006-07

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 32Section 43(1)Section 80I

depreciation considering the nature of assets. The issue was already covered by the order of assessee’s own case in ITAT-Amritsar Bench, ITA No-415/Asr/2009 date of pronouncement 27/06/2012 in paragraph no 22. We relied on the order of coordinate bench &upheld the order of the ld. CIT(A). I.T.A. Nos.288 to 294/Asr/2015 38 15.1. In the result

THE DY.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, JAMMU vs. M/S FILL INDUSTRIES,, SRINAGAR

In the result appeal of the assessee ground no 4 to 4

ITA 291/ASR/2015[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar24 Feb 2023AY 2004-05

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 32Section 43(1)Section 80I

depreciation considering the nature of assets. The issue was already covered by the order of assessee’s own case in ITAT-Amritsar Bench, ITA No-415/Asr/2009 date of pronouncement 27/06/2012 in paragraph no 22. We relied on the order of coordinate bench &upheld the order of the ld. CIT(A). I.T.A. Nos.288 to 294/Asr/2015 38 15.1. In the result

M/S FIL INDUSTRIES LTD,SRINAGAR vs. THE DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, SRINAGAR

In the result appeal of the assessee ground no 4 to 4

ITA 417/ASR/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar24 Feb 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 32Section 43(1)Section 80I

depreciation considering the nature of assets. The issue was already covered by the order of assessee’s own case in ITAT-Amritsar Bench, ITA No-415/Asr/2009 date of pronouncement 27/06/2012 in paragraph no 22. We relied on the order of coordinate bench &upheld the order of the ld. CIT(A). I.T.A. Nos.288 to 294/Asr/2015 38 15.1. In the result

M/S FIL INDUSTRIES LTD,SRINAGAR vs. THE ADDL. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, SRINAGAR

In the result appeal of the assessee ground no 4 to 4

ITA 255/ASR/2015[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar24 Feb 2023AY 2008-09

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 32Section 43(1)Section 80I

depreciation considering the nature of assets. The issue was already covered by the order of assessee’s own case in ITAT-Amritsar Bench, ITA No-415/Asr/2009 date of pronouncement 27/06/2012 in paragraph no 22. We relied on the order of coordinate bench &upheld the order of the ld. CIT(A). I.T.A. Nos.288 to 294/Asr/2015 38 15.1. In the result

THE DY.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, JAMMU vs. M/S FILL INDUSTRIES,, SRINAGAR

In the result appeal of the assessee ground no 4 to 4

ITA 289/ASR/2015[2002-03]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar24 Feb 2023AY 2002-03

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 32Section 43(1)Section 80I

depreciation considering the nature of assets. The issue was already covered by the order of assessee’s own case in ITAT-Amritsar Bench, ITA No-415/Asr/2009 date of pronouncement 27/06/2012 in paragraph no 22. We relied on the order of coordinate bench &upheld the order of the ld. CIT(A). I.T.A. Nos.288 to 294/Asr/2015 38 15.1. In the result

THE DY.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, JAMMU vs. M/S FIL INDUSTRIES,, SRINAGAR

In the result appeal of the assessee ground no 4 to 4

ITA 293/ASR/2015[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar24 Feb 2023AY 2007-08

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 32Section 43(1)Section 80I

depreciation considering the nature of assets. The issue was already covered by the order of assessee’s own case in ITAT-Amritsar Bench, ITA No-415/Asr/2009 date of pronouncement 27/06/2012 in paragraph no 22. We relied on the order of coordinate bench &upheld the order of the ld. CIT(A). I.T.A. Nos.288 to 294/Asr/2015 38 15.1. In the result

THE DY.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, JAMMU vs. M/S FILL INDUSTRIES,, SRINAGAR

In the result appeal of the assessee ground no 4 to 4

ITA 290/ASR/2015[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar24 Feb 2023AY 2003-04

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 32Section 43(1)Section 80I

depreciation considering the nature of assets. The issue was already covered by the order of assessee’s own case in ITAT-Amritsar Bench, ITA No-415/Asr/2009 date of pronouncement 27/06/2012 in paragraph no 22. We relied on the order of coordinate bench &upheld the order of the ld. CIT(A). I.T.A. Nos.288 to 294/Asr/2015 38 15.1. In the result

THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JAMMU vs. M/S. FIL INDUSTRIES LTD, SRINAGAR

In the result appeal of the assessee ground no 4 to 4

ITA 470/ASR/2015[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar24 Feb 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 32Section 43(1)Section 80I

depreciation considering the nature of assets. The issue was already covered by the order of assessee’s own case in ITAT-Amritsar Bench, ITA No-415/Asr/2009 date of pronouncement 27/06/2012 in paragraph no 22. We relied on the order of coordinate bench &upheld the order of the ld. CIT(A). I.T.A. Nos.288 to 294/Asr/2015 38 15.1. In the result

SMT. HARVINDER KAUR,KAPURTHALA vs. A.C.I.T, CENTRAL CIRCLE-I,, JALANDHAR

In the result, the assessee’s appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 328/ASR/2017[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar29 Oct 2018AY 2008-09

Bench: Sh. Sanjay Arora & Sh. N. K. Choudhryi. T. A. No. 328/(Asr)/2017 Assessment Year: 2008-09

For Appellant: Sh. Surinder Mahajan (C.A.)For Respondent: Sh. Alok Kumar, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 36(1)(iii)

depreciation (on fixed assets) stands claimed, the interest would, as per proviso to section 36(1)(iii), require being capitalized. The assessee has completely failed to come out, much less exhibit, the bare, basic facts of the case, which is unfortunate, much less rebut the clear findings by the Revenue authorities in the matter or show any infirmity therein

INCOME TAX OFFICEER, WARD - 2(2),, JAMMU vs. M/S NIKHIL INFRA - TECH LTD., DELHI

In the result, the Revenue’s appeal is partly allowed

ITA 373/ASR/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar28 Mar 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: Sh. Sanjay Arora & Sh. N. K. Choudhryi.T.A. No. 373/(Asr)/2017 Assessment Year: 2009-10

For Appellant: Sh. Charan Dass (D.R.)For Respondent: Sh. R. L. Gupta (Adv.)
Section 142(1)Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 361Section 68

depreciation allowance (Rs.3.18 lacs) and interest u/s. 361(iii) (at Rs.9.46 lacs), as well as addition u/s. 68 qua a secured loan (Rs.97.01 lacs), were effected. In first appeal, the ld. CIT(A) called for a remand report from the AO in pursuance to the assessee’s Ground 2 before him challenging the assessment u/s. 144 in view

SH. KARAMJIT SINGH RAI,HOSHIARPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER , HOSHIARPUR

In the result, appeal filed by the Assessee is allowed

ITA 227/ASR/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar15 Jan 2020AY 2010-11

Bench: Sh. N.K.Choudhry & Dr. A.L.Saini

For Appellant: Sh. Ashray Sarna (Ld. C. A.)For Respondent: Sh. Charan Dass (Ld. D. R.)
Section 144Section 147Section 250(6)Section 69

144 r.w.s. 147 of the Act. 2. Brief facts of the case are as under: An information was received in AIR from the Tehsildar, to the effect that the assessee had purchased a land situated in village Kitna 2 Sh. Karamjit Singh Rai Vs. ITO from Smt. Naranjan Kaur wife of Sh. Udai Singh for a consideration of Rs.68

M/S EMBROCIA FARMS PVT LTD. ,PATHANKOT vs. D.C.I.T, CIRCLE-6,, PATHANKOT

In the result, the assessee’s appeal is (in ITA No

ITA 284/ASR/2017[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar13 May 2019AY 2006-07

Bench: Sh. Sanjay Arorai.T.A. Nos. 561/Asr/2018 & 284/Asr/2017 Assessment Year: 2006-07

For Appellant: Sh. Tarsem Lal, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Charan Dass, Sr. D.R
Section 143(3)Section 154Section 250Section 271(1)(c)Section 50C

depreciable assets] against the declared short term capital gain of Rs.2,09,00,272/-, resulting into under-statement of capital gain to the tune of Rs.25,90,272/-, subject to the finding that the AO may ensure that for working out short term capital gain, set off of WDV of all and (AY 2006-07) Embrocia Farms

MESERS EMBROCIA FARMS PVT LTD,PATHANKOT vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-6, PATHANKOT

In the result, the assessee’s appeal is (in ITA No

ITA 561/ASR/2018[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar13 May 2019AY 2006-07

Bench: Sh. Sanjay Arorai.T.A. Nos. 561/Asr/2018 & 284/Asr/2017 Assessment Year: 2006-07

For Appellant: Sh. Tarsem Lal, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Charan Dass, Sr. D.R
Section 143(3)Section 154Section 250Section 271(1)(c)Section 50C

depreciable assets] against the declared short term capital gain of Rs.2,09,00,272/-, resulting into under-statement of capital gain to the tune of Rs.25,90,272/-, subject to the finding that the AO may ensure that for working out short term capital gain, set off of WDV of all and (AY 2006-07) Embrocia Farms

SHRI AMRIT PARKASH SEHGAL (HUF),JALANDHAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-2(1), JALANDHAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 12/ASR/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar24 Aug 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: Sh. Surinder Mahajan, CAFor Respondent: Sh. Amlendu Nath Misra, CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 154Section 263

144 of the act and the replies filed, it is abundantly clear that the Assessing 11 Amrit Parkash Sehgal (HUF) v. ITO Authority has made enquiry about the expenses claimed by the appellant assessee in respect of current repairs and maintenance of machinery, current repairs and maintenance of building and interest claimed during the course of assessment proceedings as well

M/S NARULA FOODS PRIVATE LIMITED,FEROZEPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and appeals of assessee are allowed in the terms indicated above

ITA 76/ASR/2020[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar09 Jun 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 144Section 250(6)

144 r.w.s 153A of the Act which is bad in law and against the facts and circumstances of the case and is not sustainable on various legal and factual grounds. 3. That having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, Hon’ble CIT(A) has erred in law and on facts in partly confirming the action

M/S NARULA FOODS PRIVATE LIMITED,FEROZEPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed and appeals of assessee are allowed in the terms indicated above

ITA 77/ASR/2020[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar09 Jun 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 144Section 250(6)

144 r.w.s 153A of the Act which is bad in law and against the facts and circumstances of the case and is not sustainable on various legal and factual grounds. 3. That having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, Hon’ble CIT(A) has erred in law and on facts in partly confirming the action