BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

8 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 264clear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai55Delhi54Bangalore37Mumbai34Kolkata33Hyderabad22Rajkot21Jaipur20Ahmedabad16Indore12Cochin12Pune11Chandigarh10Panaji10Amritsar8Patna7Lucknow6Cuttack5SC4Surat4Visakhapatnam3Nagpur3Jabalpur2Dehradun2Ranchi1Jodhpur1

Key Topics

Section 26410Section 271F7Section 194C6Section 1486Section 250(6)4Section 69A4Section 1504Section 143(3)4Addition to Income4

PUNJAB STATE WAREHOUSING CORPORATION,HOSHIARPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER TDS-1, JALANDHAR

In the result, the appeals filed are allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 645/ASR/2019[20103-14]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar31 Jan 2023

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 156Section 194CSection 249Section 264Section 5

264 of the Act is liable to be condoned and stands condoned, however, the assessee shall have to explain the delay from 1st May, 2014 to 17 July 2014 which is caused for filing the appeal u/s 249 of the Act before the Ld. CIT(A).” The ld. CIT(A) has dismissed the subject appeals even

PUNJAB STATE WAREHOUSING CORPORATION,HOSHIARPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER - TDS-1, JALANDHAR

In the result, the appeals filed are allowed for statistical purpose

Condonation of Delay4
Reopening of Assessment3
TDS3
ITA 646/ASR/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar31 Jan 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 156Section 194CSection 249Section 264Section 5

264 of the Act is liable to be condoned and stands condoned, however, the assessee shall have to explain the delay from 1st May, 2014 to 17 July 2014 which is caused for filing the appeal u/s 249 of the Act before the Ld. CIT(A).” The ld. CIT(A) has dismissed the subject appeals even

PUNJAB STATE WAREHOUSING CORPORATION,HOSHIARPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER TDS-1`, JALANDHAR

In the result, the appeals filed are allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 644/ASR/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar31 Jan 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 156Section 194CSection 249Section 264Section 5

264 of the Act is liable to be condoned and stands condoned, however, the assessee shall have to explain the delay from 1st May, 2014 to 17 July 2014 which is caused for filing the appeal u/s 249 of the Act before the Ld. CIT(A).” The ld. CIT(A) has dismissed the subject appeals even

M/S CONSTRUCATIONENGINEERS,SRINAGAR vs. ASSISTAN COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-3, SRINAGAR

In the result, the appeal bearing ITA No

ITA 141/ASR/2020[1998-99]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar30 Aug 2023AY 1998-99

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjeei.T.A. No.141/Asr/2020 Assessment Year: 1998-99 M/S Construction Engineers I.E. Vs. Asstt. Commissioner Of Baghatbarzulla Income Tax Circle-3, [Pan: Aabfc7715P] Srinagar. (Respondent) (Appellant)

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 264

delay of 1068 days is condoned. 3. The assessee raised the following grounds: “1. The Ld. CIT [Appeals) has erred in upholding addition made by Ld. AO by applying net profit rate of 12.5 % on the grossreceipts. The said addition therefore deserves to be deleted. 2. The Ld. CIT (Appeals) has erred in upholding addition made

M/S. GOLDEN TULIP HOSPITALITY PRIVATE LIMITED,SRINAGAR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, SRINAGAR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 264/ASR/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar10 Nov 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: Sh. Rohit Kapoor, CA &
Section 150Section 250(6)Section 69A

264 & 265/Asr/2023 Assessment Years: 2014-15 & 2019-20 M/s Golden Tulip Hospitality Vs. ACIT, Central Circle Pvt. Ltd., Hyderpora Bye Pass Srinagar Srinagar 190014 [PAN: AAFCG2464Q] (Respondent) (Appellant Appellant by : Sh. Rohit Kapoor, CA & V.S. Aggarwal, ITP : Sh. Ravinder Mittal, Sr. DR Respondent by Date of Hearing : 31.10.2023 Date of Pronouncement : 10.11.2023 ORDER Per Dr. M. L. Meena, AM: Both

M/S. GOLDEN TULIP HOSPITALITY PRIVATE LIMITED ,SRINAGAR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, SRINAGAR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 265/ASR/2023[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar10 Nov 2023AY 2019-20

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: Sh. Rohit Kapoor, CA &
Section 150Section 250(6)Section 69A

264 & 265/Asr/2023 Assessment Years: 2014-15 & 2019-20 M/s Golden Tulip Hospitality Vs. ACIT, Central Circle Pvt. Ltd., Hyderpora Bye Pass Srinagar Srinagar 190014 [PAN: AAFCG2464Q] (Respondent) (Appellant Appellant by : Sh. Rohit Kapoor, CA & V.S. Aggarwal, ITP : Sh. Ravinder Mittal, Sr. DR Respondent by Date of Hearing : 31.10.2023 Date of Pronouncement : 10.11.2023 ORDER Per Dr. M. L. Meena, AM: Both

M/S JAMMU COOPERATIVE WHOLE SALE LIMITED,JAMMU vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-2 (1), JAMMU

ITA 150/ASR/2020[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar13 Jun 2023AY 2005-06

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjeei.T.A. No. 150/Asr/2020 Assessment Year: 2005-06 M/S Jammu Cooperative Whole Sale The Ito Limited (Super Bazar) Old Hospital Ward-2(1) Road, City Chowk, Jammu- Jammu 180001(J&K)-180001

For Appellant: None
Section 147Section 148Section 152Section 40A(3)

delay of seven days in filing the appeal is hereby condoned and appeal of the assessee is admitted for adjudication on merits. 4. The first grounds raised is general pertaining to consideration of fact of the case and applicable law shall be taken up in adjudicating the issue based grounds and hence, it does not require an independent adjudication

SMT. PRITPAL KAUR,LUDHIANA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 4(3), JALANDHAR

ITA 59/ASR/2021[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar07 Aug 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. Mohit Kumar Nigam, Sr. DR
Section 144Section 148Section 2Section 271F

delay of 80 days is condoned, in view of the bonafide reason of the medical ground and accordingly, the appeal is admitted for adjudication on merits. 3 Pritpal Kaur v. ITO 4. The grounds raised are vague and not specific to issue. However, the assessee’s main grievance is that the ld. CIT(A) has wrongly imposed penalty of Rs.5000