BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 207clear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai207Karnataka101Delhi57Bangalore57Mumbai44Raipur41Kolkata39Chandigarh28Jaipur22Ahmedabad20Hyderabad16Pune9Surat8Cuttack8Rajkot5Jabalpur5Visakhapatnam4Lucknow4SC3Amritsar3Guwahati3Nagpur3Ranchi2Patna2Telangana1Varanasi1Agra1Jodhpur1Panaji1Dehradun1Cochin1Rajasthan1Andhra Pradesh1

Key Topics

Section 1489Section 1396Section 2504Section 1544Section 1474Section 143(1)2Section 112Section 12A(1)(b)2Deduction

VOLUNTARY MEDCARE SOCIETY,SRINAGAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER ( EXEMPTIONS) WARD , JAMMU

In the result, the appeal of the assessee ITA No

ITA 262/ASR/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar22 Nov 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 11Section 12ASection 12A(1)Section 12A(1)(b)Section 139Section 139(1)Section 139(4)Section 143(1)Section 154Section 250

207 1st Floor, Yatri Bhawan II, Jammu Durga Nag Dalgate, Srinagar, Pin-90001 [PAN:-AADAV8533H] (Respondent) (Appellant) Appellant by Sh. Upendra Bhat, CA Respondent by Sh. Ravinder Mittal, Sr. DR 30-10-2023 Date of Hearing Date of Pronouncement 22.11.2023 ORDER Per: Anikesh Banerjee, JM: The instant appeal of the assessee is directed against the order of the ld. Commissioner

2
Addition to Income2

KHURSHID AHMAD DAR,JAMMU AND KASHMIR, INDIA vs. ITO WARD, UDHAMPUR, UDHAMPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 236/ASR/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar10 Nov 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Dr. Mitha Lalmeena, Hon'Ble & Shri Udayan Das Gupta, Hon'Blekhurshid Ahmad Dar Vs. Ito, Ward, Nully Poshwari Turkawangam, Udhampur Shopia, 192305, Jammu & Kashmir, India.Pin 192305. Pan No. Awmpd5664K Assessee By Shri Rohit Kapoor, Adv. & Shri V.S. Aggarwal, Itp. Revenue By Mrs. Roshanta Kumari Meena, Cit Dr. Date Of Hearing 23.09.2025. Date Of Pronouncement To. [1 .2025. Order Dr. Mitha Lal Meena, A.M.:

Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 151Section 151(1)Section 250Section 250(6)Section 282Section 69A

condone the delay of 171 days and admit the appeal on merits. 4 4. The assessee has raised additional legal grounds which were also raised in main grounds. One of the legal issue raised by the assessee is that the assessment framed under section 147 is bad in law as the notice under section 148 was issued on 13.04.2021 without

SMT. HARVINDER KAUR,KAPURTHALA vs. A.C.I.T, CENTRAL CIRCLE-I,, JALANDHAR

In the result, the assessee’s appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 328/ASR/2017[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar29 Oct 2018AY 2008-09

Bench: Sh. Sanjay Arora & Sh. N. K. Choudhryi. T. A. No. 328/(Asr)/2017 Assessment Year: 2008-09

For Appellant: Sh. Surinder Mahajan (C.A.)For Respondent: Sh. Alok Kumar, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 36(1)(iii)

207 Taxman 84 (Bom) (copy on record). 7. We have heard the parties, and perused the material on record. The first issue that confronts us is as to the legal competence of the tribunal (as an appellate authority under the Act) to adjudicate qua the levy of interest u/ss. 234A and 234B, held as compensatory and mandatory by the Apex