BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 196clear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka428Delhi141Mumbai70Bangalore30Jaipur23Cuttack19Lucknow18Chandigarh16Calcutta16Chennai15Ahmedabad12Pune6Hyderabad6Surat5Visakhapatnam5Kolkata5Agra4Telangana4Amritsar3Jodhpur3Rajasthan2Indore2Rajkot2SC2Andhra Pradesh2Patna1Punjab & Haryana1Jabalpur1Nagpur1

Key Topics

Section 12A5Section 114Section 143(3)3Exemption3Section 102

M/S JOSHPH'S SCHOOL,LUDHIANA vs. THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXCEPTIONS), CHANDIGARH

ITA 463/ASR/2016[]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar16 Sept 2021

Bench: Sh. Laliet Kumar & Dr. M. L. Meenai.T.A. No. 463/Asr/2016 Assessment Year:2016-17 M/S Joseph’S School Dugri Vs. Cit(E), Dhandra Road, Ludhiana. Chandigarh. [Pan: Aaatj3850H] (Appellant) (Respendent)

Section 10Section 11Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 2(15)

196 (Punjab & Haryana) and the case laws listed as below: i. CIT(E) vs. Khatu Ji Para Medical Technology Educational & Research Society, 106 taxmann.com 344 (P & H). ii. M/s Arya Shiksha Mandal K.M.V. vs. CIT (E) ITA No.522/ASR/2016 dated 27.03.2017 iii. M/s Markandeshwar Educational Society, vs. CIT(E) in ITA No.1015/CHD/2016 order dated 15.11.2017 4. Per contra

DIOCESE OF CHANDIGARH,CNI,MISSION COMPUNDBROWN ROAD ,LUDHIANA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTIONS), JALANDHAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 737/ASR/2017[ 2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar18 Mar 2019

Bench: Sh. N. S. Saini & Sh. N. K. Choudhryita No. 737/Asr./2017 : Asstt. Year : 2012-13 Diocese Of Chandigarh, Vs Income Tax Officer(Exemption), Cni, Mission Compound, Brown Jalandhar Road, Ludhiana (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaatd0653Q Assessee By : Shri. Padam Bhal, Ca Revenue By : Smt. Ratinder Kaur, Dr Date Of Hearing :19.02.2019 Date Of Pronouncement : 19.03.2019 Order Per N. S. Saini: This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of Cit(A)-4, Ludhiana Dated 22.09.2017. 2. The Assessee Has Raised Following Grounds Of Appeal: “The Learned Cit (Appeals) Order Is Not Justified So Far As Additions Resulting In Taxable Income Of The Assessee Amounting To Rs. 1823453/- By Non- Deletion Of Following Additions Made By Assessing Officer In Order U/S 143(3) In Gross Receipts Of The Assessee & Even Afterwards Net Rectifying The Order Passed U/S 154 R.W.S. 250(6) As Per Details Below: 1. The Amount Of Group Gratuity Fund Balance As On 31.03.2012 Rs.2039842/- & Interest Accrued On This Group Gratuity Fund Rs.176503/- For The Financial Year Has Wrongly Been Treated As Part Of Gross Receipts Of The Trust By The Assessing

For Appellant: Shri. Padam Bhal, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Ratinder Kaur, DR
Section 11Section 143(3)Section 154

196/- received during the year as receipt out of which a sum of Rs.20,39,842/- is on account of group gratuity ITA No. 737/Asr./2017 3 Diocese of Chandigarh fund and Rs.1,76,503/- on account of interest received on LIC group gratuity fund have been deducted without any legality. Thus, it is not in accordance with the provisions

MESERS BAJAJ EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,LUDHIANA vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS), CHANDIGARH

The appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 517/ASR/2018[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar16 Aug 2021AY 2018-19

Bench: : Shri Laliet Kumar & Dr. Mitha Lal Meena

Section 10Section 12Section 12A

section 12 AA of the Income Tax Act however the registration was rejected by the CIT exemption on the ground that the assessee had received loans in ITA 517/Amr/2018 3 the previous years from various persons. However, in the return of income for the subsequent years the appellant society has shown the loan as donations towards the corpus fund