BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

14 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 154clear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka449Mumbai225Delhi216Chennai131Bangalore92Ahmedabad83Hyderabad57Pune54Jaipur37Kolkata36Chandigarh33Lucknow27Visakhapatnam26Allahabad18Calcutta16Indore15Cochin14Amritsar14Cuttack13Surat12Rajkot11Agra7Jodhpur6Jabalpur5Nagpur4Dehradun4Patna3SC3Telangana3Varanasi3Guwahati2Rajasthan2Ranchi2Andhra Pradesh1Raipur1

Key Topics

Section 12A49Section 2(15)17Section 15412Section 143(3)10Section 119Exemption6Section 234E5Section 25Section 200A4Penalty

BAHUDER KE TEXTILES AND KNITWEARS ASSOCIATION,LUDHIANA vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ( EXEMPTION ) , CHANDIGARH

The appeals of the assessee are disposed off in the terms indicated as above

ITA 501/ASR/2019[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar11 Aug 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: Sh. Sudhir SehgalFor Respondent: Sh. Amlendu Nath Misra, CIT DR
Section 12ASection 2(15)Section 25

charitable purposes” as defined u/s 2(`15) of the Act.”. So, CIT(E) rejected the application by citing his inability to deviate from earlier decision and did not discuss the merits of the case. Aggrieved, the assessee filed appeal before ITAT, vide appeal no. 501/Asr/2019. Hearing in this case was fixed for first time on 05.02.2020. During the hearing

BAHADUR KE TEXTILES & KNITWEAR ASSOCIATION,LUDHIANA vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS), CHANDIGARH

3
Addition to Income3
Deduction3

The appeals of the assessee are disposed off in the terms indicated as above

ITA 86/ASR/2020[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar11 Aug 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: Sh. Sudhir SehgalFor Respondent: Sh. Amlendu Nath Misra, CIT DR
Section 12ASection 2(15)Section 25

charitable purposes” as defined u/s 2(`15) of the Act.”. So, CIT(E) rejected the application by citing his inability to deviate from earlier decision and did not discuss the merits of the case. Aggrieved, the assessee filed appeal before ITAT, vide appeal no. 501/Asr/2019. Hearing in this case was fixed for first time on 05.02.2020. During the hearing

MEASAGE GRAM SEWA AND VIKLANG SHAYTA SANSTHA REGD,BATHINDA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-1, (EXEMPTION), CHANDIGARH

The appeal of the assessee is allowed in the terms indicated as above

ITA 619/ASR/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar02 Mar 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: Sh. K. R. Jain, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Satbir Singh, Sr. DR
Section 11Section 12ASection 139(9)Section 143(1)Section 154Section 4

charitable or religious trust or institution to file the auditor's report along with the return of total income, where such trust or institution claims exemption under Sections 11 and 12. However, in cases where for reasons beyond the control of the assessee some delay has occurred in filing the said report the exemption as available to such trust under

MESERS EMBROCIA FARMS PVT LTD,PATHANKOT vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-6, PATHANKOT

In the result, the assessee’s appeal is (in ITA No

ITA 561/ASR/2018[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar13 May 2019AY 2006-07

Bench: Sh. Sanjay Arorai.T.A. Nos. 561/Asr/2018 & 284/Asr/2017 Assessment Year: 2006-07

For Appellant: Sh. Tarsem Lal, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Charan Dass, Sr. D.R
Section 143(3)Section 154Section 250Section 271(1)(c)Section 50C

Section 154(8) makes this further clear, i.e., that any order of amendment u/s. 154(1) r/w sec. 154(4) has to be a result of a conscious decision by the concerned authority to either amend or not to amend the order sought to be rectified. The time frame stipulated thereby is, even as clarified

M/S EMBROCIA FARMS PVT LTD. ,PATHANKOT vs. D.C.I.T, CIRCLE-6,, PATHANKOT

In the result, the assessee’s appeal is (in ITA No

ITA 284/ASR/2017[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar13 May 2019AY 2006-07

Bench: Sh. Sanjay Arorai.T.A. Nos. 561/Asr/2018 & 284/Asr/2017 Assessment Year: 2006-07

For Appellant: Sh. Tarsem Lal, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Charan Dass, Sr. D.R
Section 143(3)Section 154Section 250Section 271(1)(c)Section 50C

Section 154(8) makes this further clear, i.e., that any order of amendment u/s. 154(1) r/w sec. 154(4) has to be a result of a conscious decision by the concerned authority to either amend or not to amend the order sought to be rectified. The time frame stipulated thereby is, even as clarified

THE THE INCOME-TAX OFFICER, BATHINDA vs. M/S. SUKHMANI SOCIETY FOR CITIZEN SERVICES,, BATHINDA

In the result, the assessees’ appeal is allowed, and the Revenue’s appeals are disposed of accordingly

ITA 162/ASR/2014[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar15 May 2018AY 2008-09

Bench: Sh. Sanjay Arora & Sh. N. K. Choudhryi.T.A. No. 141/(Asr)/2014 Assessment Year:

For Appellant: Sh. Devendra Singh CIT- D.RFor Respondent: Sh. J. K. Gupta (Adv.)
Section 12ASection 2Section 2(15)

trust/s institution, as well as the genuineness of its activities. Clearly, satisfaction qua the objects implies satisfaction as the same constituting a ‘charitable purpose’ under the Act. The cancellation of registration, power for which stands conferred u/s. 12AA(3), co-opted on the statute by Finance (No. 2) Act, 2004 w.e.f. 01.10.2004, could only be on the ground

THE INCOME-TAX OFFICER, BATHINDA vs. M/S. SUKHMANI SOCIETY FOR CITIZEN SERVICES,, BATHINDA

In the result, the assessees’ appeal is allowed, and the Revenue’s appeals are disposed of accordingly

ITA 161/ASR/2014[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar15 May 2018AY 2007-08

Bench: Sh. Sanjay Arora & Sh. N. K. Choudhryi.T.A. No. 141/(Asr)/2014 Assessment Year:

For Appellant: Sh. Devendra Singh CIT- D.RFor Respondent: Sh. J. K. Gupta (Adv.)
Section 12ASection 2Section 2(15)

trust/s institution, as well as the genuineness of its activities. Clearly, satisfaction qua the objects implies satisfaction as the same constituting a ‘charitable purpose’ under the Act. The cancellation of registration, power for which stands conferred u/s. 12AA(3), co-opted on the statute by Finance (No. 2) Act, 2004 w.e.f. 01.10.2004, could only be on the ground

SUKHMANI SOCIETY FOR CITIZEN SERVICES,BATHINDA vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, BATHINDA

In the result, the assessees’ appeal is allowed, and the Revenue’s appeals are disposed of accordingly

ITA 141/ASR/2014[]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar15 May 2018

Bench: Sh. Sanjay Arora & Sh. N. K. Choudhryi.T.A. No. 141/(Asr)/2014 Assessment Year:

For Appellant: Sh. Devendra Singh CIT- D.RFor Respondent: Sh. J. K. Gupta (Adv.)
Section 12ASection 2Section 2(15)

trust/s institution, as well as the genuineness of its activities. Clearly, satisfaction qua the objects implies satisfaction as the same constituting a ‘charitable purpose’ under the Act. The cancellation of registration, power for which stands conferred u/s. 12AA(3), co-opted on the statute by Finance (No. 2) Act, 2004 w.e.f. 01.10.2004, could only be on the ground

THE INCOME-TAX OFFICER, BATHINDA vs. M/S. SUKHMANI SOCIETY FOR CITIZEN SERVICES,, BATHINDA

In the result, the assessees’ appeal is allowed, and the Revenue’s appeals are disposed of accordingly

ITA 159/ASR/2014[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar15 May 2018AY 2005-06

Bench: Sh. Sanjay Arora & Sh. N. K. Choudhryi.T.A. No. 141/(Asr)/2014 Assessment Year:

For Appellant: Sh. Devendra Singh CIT- D.RFor Respondent: Sh. J. K. Gupta (Adv.)
Section 12ASection 2Section 2(15)

trust/s institution, as well as the genuineness of its activities. Clearly, satisfaction qua the objects implies satisfaction as the same constituting a ‘charitable purpose’ under the Act. The cancellation of registration, power for which stands conferred u/s. 12AA(3), co-opted on the statute by Finance (No. 2) Act, 2004 w.e.f. 01.10.2004, could only be on the ground

THE INCOME-TAX OFFICER, BATHINDA vs. M/S. SUKHMANI SOCIETY FOR CITIZEN SERVICES,, BATHINDA

In the result, the assessees’ appeal is allowed, and the Revenue’s appeals are disposed of accordingly

ITA 160/ASR/2014[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar15 May 2018AY 2006-07

Bench: Sh. Sanjay Arora & Sh. N. K. Choudhryi.T.A. No. 141/(Asr)/2014 Assessment Year:

For Appellant: Sh. Devendra Singh CIT- D.RFor Respondent: Sh. J. K. Gupta (Adv.)
Section 12ASection 2Section 2(15)

trust/s institution, as well as the genuineness of its activities. Clearly, satisfaction qua the objects implies satisfaction as the same constituting a ‘charitable purpose’ under the Act. The cancellation of registration, power for which stands conferred u/s. 12AA(3), co-opted on the statute by Finance (No. 2) Act, 2004 w.e.f. 01.10.2004, could only be on the ground

SATNAM SINGH MEMORIAL TRUST,JALANDHAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICE WARD-III(2), JALANDHAR

In the result, the assessee’s appeal is dismissed

ITA 478/ASR/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar19 Jul 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Sh. Sanjay Arorai.T.A. No. 478/Asr/2017 Assessment Year: 2010-11

For Appellant: Sh. Rohit Bhardwar (Adv.)For Respondent: Sh. Charan Dass (D.R.)
Section 10Section 10(23)(iiiae)Section 12ASection 143(3)

charitable institution u/s. 12AA of the Act, filed its’ return of income for the relevant year on 14.10.2010, at nil income; it’s operating statement reflecting a loss of Rs. 29,530 (PB pg. 3). Examining the same in the assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer (AO) found that while expenditure aggregating to Rs.18,29,435, i.e., on electricity, salary, bonus

DIOCESE OF CHANDIGARH,CNI,MISSION COMPUNDBROWN ROAD ,LUDHIANA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTIONS), JALANDHAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 737/ASR/2017[ 2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar18 Mar 2019

Bench: Sh. N. S. Saini & Sh. N. K. Choudhryita No. 737/Asr./2017 : Asstt. Year : 2012-13 Diocese Of Chandigarh, Vs Income Tax Officer(Exemption), Cni, Mission Compound, Brown Jalandhar Road, Ludhiana (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaatd0653Q Assessee By : Shri. Padam Bhal, Ca Revenue By : Smt. Ratinder Kaur, Dr Date Of Hearing :19.02.2019 Date Of Pronouncement : 19.03.2019 Order Per N. S. Saini: This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of Cit(A)-4, Ludhiana Dated 22.09.2017. 2. The Assessee Has Raised Following Grounds Of Appeal: “The Learned Cit (Appeals) Order Is Not Justified So Far As Additions Resulting In Taxable Income Of The Assessee Amounting To Rs. 1823453/- By Non- Deletion Of Following Additions Made By Assessing Officer In Order U/S 143(3) In Gross Receipts Of The Assessee & Even Afterwards Net Rectifying The Order Passed U/S 154 R.W.S. 250(6) As Per Details Below: 1. The Amount Of Group Gratuity Fund Balance As On 31.03.2012 Rs.2039842/- & Interest Accrued On This Group Gratuity Fund Rs.176503/- For The Financial Year Has Wrongly Been Treated As Part Of Gross Receipts Of The Trust By The Assessing

For Appellant: Shri. Padam Bhal, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Ratinder Kaur, DR
Section 11Section 143(3)Section 154

154 r.w.s. 250(6) as per details below: 1. The amount of Group Gratuity Fund balance as on 31.03.2012 Rs.2039842/- and interest accrued on this Group Gratuity Fund Rs.176503/- for the financial year has wrongly been treated as part of gross receipts of the trust by the Assessing ITA No. 737/Asr./2017 2 Diocese of Chandigarh Officer, whereas this amount

SHRI AMAR NATH JAIN MEMORIAL CHARITABLE TRUST,LUDHIANA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER ( EXEMPTION ) , JALANDHAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 441/ASR/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar21 Oct 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. S. M. Surendranath, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 154Section 164Section 164(1)Section 250(6)

Charitable Trust, (Exemptions), B-XXIV-4632, Jain Mandir Ward Jalandhar Road, Ludhiana [PAN: AADTS 4396N] (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by : None Respondent by: Sh. S. M. Surendranath, Sr. DR Date of Hearing: 13.10.2022 Date of Pronouncement: 21.10.2022 ORDER Per Dr. M. L. Meena, AM: This appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order dated 24.04.2019 passed

M/S. IQBAL MEMORIAL TRUST ,SRINAGAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER ( TDS), SRINAGAR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 68/ASR/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar17 May 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 12ASection 154Section 200ASection 200A(1)(a)Section 200A(1)(b)Section 234E

charitable society registration u/s 12A of the Income Tax Act where the ld. AO has levied late fee of Rs.12,595/- for filing of TDS return late in respect of financial year 2012-13 under consideration. The counsel explained that the AO has stated in his order passed u/s 154 that is not empowered to determine the similarity of facts