C-DOT FORUM ,LUDHIANA vs. THE CIT EXEMPTIONS CHANDIGARH , CHANDIGARH

In the result both the appeals of the assessee are dismissed being devoid of merits

Bench: Sh. Manoj Kumar Aggarwal & Sh. Udayan Das Gupta(Physical Hearing) I.T.A. No. 115 & 116/Asr/2025 Assessment Year.: 2022-23 C-Dot Forum, 644 Phase-1, Vs. Cit (Exemptions) Model Town Bathinda. Chandigarh. [Pan: Aaeac3681J] (Appellant) (Respondent)

115 & 116/Asr/2025 Assessment Year.: 2022-23 6 of identification of activities carried out by this assessee for “charitable purpose” as per provisions of section 2(15) of the Act 61, for which registration is being sought by the society and secondly whether the assessee in the instant case has violated the (Professional Conduct , Etiquette and ethics) Regulations 2002 prescribed

LATE SH BHAGAT CHAJJU RAM,JAMMU vs. ITO EXEMPTION JAMMU, JAMMU

In the result, the captioned four appeals of the assessee are allowed for