M/S MANAGING COMMITTEE SWAMI PREMANAND MAHAVIDALYA,HOSHIARPUR vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION),, CHANDIGARH

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar & Dr. Mitha Lal Meena

trust/ society is not an idle formality [Anand MargaPracharakaSaughaVs CIT (1996) 218 ITR 254 (Cal)] 5. In order to appraise the activities and whether the same' were in sync with the stated objects an opportunity of personal hearing was accorded on, 09.05.2017 and the applicant was requested to file, the following details/ clarifications: i. Details of property vested

LORD MAHAVIRA HOMOEOPHATIC MEDICAL COLLEGE AND HOSPITAL ,LUDHIANA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTIONS), JALANDHAR

In the result the 2nd ground raised by the assessee is liable to be allowed

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar & Dr. Mitha Lal Meena

section 12 A for grant of registration on 24.02.2003 and same was not responded to within six months, registration of application was to be deemed to have taken effect from 24.08.20030 Held, yes.” Page 53 to 56. The Kerala High Court in the case of CIT, Cochin Vs TBI Education Trust, has taken the same view. Page

M/S LORD MAHAVIRA HOMEOP[ATHIC MEDICAL COLLEGE & HOSPITAL ,LUDHIANA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD- ( EXEMPTIONS), JALANDHAR

In the result the 2nd ground raised by the assessee is liable to be allowed

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar & Dr. Mitha Lal Meena

section 12 A for grant of registration on 24.02.2003 and same was not responded to within six months, registration of application was to be deemed to have taken effect from 24.08.20030 Held, yes.” Page 53 to 56. The Kerala High Court in the case of CIT, Cochin Vs TBI Education Trust, has taken the same view. Page

M/S LORD MAHAVIR HOMEOPATHIC MEDICAL COLLAGE & HOSPITAL,LUDHIANA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD- ( EXEMPTIONS), JALANDHAR

In the result the 2nd ground raised by the assessee is liable to be allowed

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar & Dr. Mitha Lal Meena

section 12 A for grant of registration on 24.02.2003 and same was not responded to within six months, registration of application was to be deemed to have taken effect from 24.08.20030 Held, yes.” Page 53 to 56. The Kerala High Court in the case of CIT, Cochin Vs TBI Education Trust, has taken the same view. Page

BAHADUR KE TEXTILES & KNITWEAR ASSOCIATION,LUDHIANA vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS), CHANDIGARH

The appeals of the assessee are disposed off in the terms indicated as above

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

charitable purposes” as defined u/s 2(`15) of the Act.”. So, CIT(E) rejected the application by citing his inability to deviate from earlier decision and did not discuss the merits of the case. Aggrieved, the assessee filed appeal before ITAT, vide appeal no. 501/Asr/2019. Hearing in this case was fixed for first time on 05.02.2020. During the hearing

BAHUDER KE TEXTILES AND KNITWEARS ASSOCIATION,LUDHIANA vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ( EXEMPTION ) , CHANDIGARH

The appeals of the assessee are disposed off in the terms indicated as above

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

charitable purposes” as defined u/s 2(`15) of the Act.”. So, CIT(E) rejected the application by citing his inability to deviate from earlier decision and did not discuss the merits of the case. Aggrieved, the assessee filed appeal before ITAT, vide appeal no. 501/Asr/2019. Hearing in this case was fixed for first time on 05.02.2020. During the hearing

SHIROMANI GURDWARA PARBANDHAK COMMITTEE vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-I,

In the result the appeal of the Assessee is allowed

Bench: : Shri Laliet Kumar & Dr. Mitha Lal Meenav.S. Cit – I Shirmoni Gurdwara Parbandhak Committee Amritsar Teja Singh Mundri Hall Sri Amritsar Pan:Aants1981K (Appellant) (Respondent)

10 and free oxygen during the current COVID-19 pandemic without discrimination of religion, caste, creed, color, sex, race etc have also been publicly applauded. c. During the course of proceedings detail of charitable expenditure was placed before the Ld. CIT and it is worthwhile to mention here that para in paragraph 2.2, 3.1 & 3.3 of the impugned Order

SANT MAHESH MUNI JI BOREWALE WELFARE SOCIETY,MOGA vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER(EXEMPTIONS) WARD, JALANDHAR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Sh. Ravish Sood & Dr. M. L. Meena

section 11(2) of Income Tax act, 1961 for submission of the notice in the prescribed manner to the assessing authority and in the absence of any express or by clearly implied delegation to the rule making authority of any power to impose time limit. Such time limit prescribed in the rule 17 for submission of Form no. 10

DERA SWAMI JAGAT GIRI TRUST ( REGD),PATHANKOT vs. COMMISSIONER ODF INCOME TAX ( EXEMPTIONS), CHANDIGARH

In the result, the appeal of the assesse society is allowed in the terms indicated as above

Bench: Sh. Ravish Sood & Dr. M. L. Meena

charitable in nature and have fulfilled all the conditions laid down under the law. 3 ITA No.118 /(Asr)/20 9. That it is prayed that the exemption u/s 12A may kindly be allowed in the interest of natural justice. 10. That any other ground of appeal which may be argued at the time of hearing of the appeal. 2. Briefly

DIOCESE OF CHANDIGARH,CNI,MISSION COMPUNDBROWN ROAD ,LUDHIANA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTIONS), JALANDHAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Sh. N. S. Saini & Sh. N. K. Choudhryita No. 737/Asr./2017 : Asstt. Year : 2012-13 Diocese Of Chandigarh, Vs Income Tax Officer(Exemption), Cni, Mission Compound, Brown Jalandhar Road, Ludhiana (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaatd0653Q Assessee By : Shri. Padam Bhal, Ca Revenue By : Smt. Ratinder Kaur, Dr Date Of Hearing :19.02.2019 Date Of Pronouncement : 19.03.2019 Order Per N. S. Saini: This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of Cit(A)-4, Ludhiana Dated 22.09.2017. 2. The Assessee Has Raised Following Grounds Of Appeal: “The Learned Cit (Appeals) Order Is Not Justified So Far As Additions Resulting In Taxable Income Of The Assessee Amounting To Rs. 1823453/- By Non- Deletion Of Following Additions Made By Assessing Officer In Order U/S 143(3) In Gross Receipts Of The Assessee & Even Afterwards Net Rectifying The Order Passed U/S 154 R.W.S. 250(6) As Per Details Below: 1. The Amount Of Group Gratuity Fund Balance As On 31.03.2012 Rs.2039842/- & Interest Accrued On This Group Gratuity Fund Rs.176503/- For The Financial Year Has Wrongly Been Treated As Part Of Gross Receipts Of The Trust By The Assessing

section 11/12 of the Act. The addition of Rs. 18,23,453/- made by the Assessing Officer in this case on account of under utilization of income is, therefore, upheld. In the result, ground No.1 of appeal taken by the assessee is dismissed.” 5. Before us, the AR of the assessee submitted as under: “ii) In this regard copies