LATE. SH. GURMAIL SINGH.S/O. LATE SH. LAL SINGH,SRI MUKTSAR vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE -II, BATHINDA

Appeals are disposed of in the terms and observation made as above

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

B K Jain Vs. CIT, (2017) 81 taxmann.com 134 (P&H) has taken judicial notice of the fact that there are instances where during the course of survey the assessee was found to be clearly hiding income but yet there was audacity of being defiant and not filing the return. The Hon'ble court took a view that such cases

LATE. SH. GUMAIL SINGH . S/O. SH. LAL SINGH,MUKTSAR vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE -II, BATHINDA

Appeals are disposed of in the terms and observation made as above

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

B K Jain Vs. CIT, (2017) 81 taxmann.com 134 (P&H) has taken judicial notice of the fact that there are instances where during the course of survey the assessee was found to be clearly hiding income but yet there was audacity of being defiant and not filing the return. The Hon'ble court took a view that such cases

LATE. SH. GURMAIL. SINGH S/O. SH. LAL SINGH,SHRI MUKAT SAR vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF 9INCOME TAX. CIRCLE -II, BATHINDA

Appeals are disposed of in the terms and observation made as above

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

B K Jain Vs. CIT, (2017) 81 taxmann.com 134 (P&H) has taken judicial notice of the fact that there are instances where during the course of survey the assessee was found to be clearly hiding income but yet there was audacity of being defiant and not filing the return. The Hon'ble court took a view that such cases

LATE. SH. GURMAIL. SINGH. S/O. SH. LAL SINGH,SRI MUKATSAR vs. DY.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE -II, BATHINDA

Appeals are disposed of in the terms and observation made as above

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

B K Jain Vs. CIT, (2017) 81 taxmann.com 134 (P&H) has taken judicial notice of the fact that there are instances where during the course of survey the assessee was found to be clearly hiding income but yet there was audacity of being defiant and not filing the return. The Hon'ble court took a view that such cases

LATE. SH. GURMAIL SINGH S/O. SH. LAL SINGH,SRI MUKATSAR vs. DY.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE -II, BATHINDA

Appeals are disposed of in the terms and observation made as above

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

B K Jain Vs. CIT, (2017) 81 taxmann.com 134 (P&H) has taken judicial notice of the fact that there are instances where during the course of survey the assessee was found to be clearly hiding income but yet there was audacity of being defiant and not filing the return. The Hon'ble court took a view that such cases

SH. ARASHPREET SINGH S/O LATE SH. GURMAIL SINGH,SHRI MUKATSAR vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-II, BATHINDA

Appeals are disposed of in the terms and observation made as above

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

B K Jain Vs. CIT, (2017) 81 taxmann.com 134 (P&H) has taken judicial notice of the fact that there are instances where during the course of survey the assessee was found to be clearly hiding income but yet there was audacity of being defiant and not filing the return. The Hon'ble court took a view that such cases

SH. ARSPREET SINGH . S/O. LATE. SH. GURMAIL SINGH ,MUKTSAR vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE .II, BATHINDA

Appeals are disposed of in the terms and observation made as above

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

B K Jain Vs. CIT, (2017) 81 taxmann.com 134 (P&H) has taken judicial notice of the fact that there are instances where during the course of survey the assessee was found to be clearly hiding income but yet there was audacity of being defiant and not filing the return. The Hon'ble court took a view that such cases

SH. ARASHPREET SINGH S/O. LATE SH. GURMAIL SINGH,MUKTSAR vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CERCLE- II, BATHINDA

Appeals are disposed of in the terms and observation made as above

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

B K Jain Vs. CIT, (2017) 81 taxmann.com 134 (P&H) has taken judicial notice of the fact that there are instances where during the course of survey the assessee was found to be clearly hiding income but yet there was audacity of being defiant and not filing the return. The Hon'ble court took a view that such cases

SH. ARASHPREET SINGH S/O. LATE SH. GURMAIL SINGH,MUKTSAR vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-II, BATHINDA

Appeals are disposed of in the terms and observation made as above

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

B K Jain Vs. CIT, (2017) 81 taxmann.com 134 (P&H) has taken judicial notice of the fact that there are instances where during the course of survey the assessee was found to be clearly hiding income but yet there was audacity of being defiant and not filing the return. The Hon'ble court took a view that such cases

M/S BLUE CITY TOWNSHIP & COLONIZERS,AMRITSAR. vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,, AMRITSAR.

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

1), any profit or gain arising from 12 I.T.A. No. 90/Asr/2017 Blue City Township & Colonizers v. ITO transfer of capital assets affected in a previous year was chargeable to tax under the head of ’Capital Gains' as income of the previous year when the transfer took place, i.e., 1964. Therefore, the assessee was liable to pay additional