BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “capital gains”+ Section 249(4)(b)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai194Delhi89Ahmedabad64Jaipur56Chennai46Chandigarh44Bangalore37Pune31Nagpur30Raipur28Hyderabad23Kolkata22Indore16Cochin11Surat6Jabalpur6Visakhapatnam4Guwahati4Lucknow4Ranchi3Amritsar3Jodhpur2Patna2Rajkot2Panaji2Dehradun1

Key Topics

Section 69C3Section 1473Section 249(4)(b)3Section 143(3)2Section 2502Section 1442Section 1482Addition to Income2Natural Justice2

SHRI. JAVEED AHMAD LONE ,ANANTNAGH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-3(1), SRINAGAR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 259/ASR/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar17 Jan 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Sh. Udayan Dasgupta & Sh. Krinwant Sahay

For Appellant: Sh. Upender Bhat, C.A
Section 133HSection 147Section 148Section 249(4)Section 249(4)(b)Section 250

section 249(4) Clause (b) of the I.T. Act, 1961, and has refused to admit the appeal on the grounds of non-payment of advance tax, in this case where no return of income has been filed. 4. The primary facts are that the assessee has sold immovable property (land) on 6th July, 2017, which was held

GURPREET SINGH PANNU,JALANDHAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, JALANDHAR

ITA 435/ASR/2024[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar10 Dec 2025AY 2011-12

Bench: Sh. Manoj Kumar Aggarwal & Sh. Udayan Dasgupta

For Appellant: Sh. Ashray Sarna, C. A
Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 249(4)(b)Section 250Section 69

section 249(4)(b) of the Act without considering the submission of the assessee and facts of the case. (b) That having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, Hon'ble CIT(A) has erred in law and on facts in passing contradicted order wherein appeal is dismissed as not admitted and on the other side

M/S. SATIA INDUSTRIES LIMITED,MUKTSAR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-1, BATHINDA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee bearing ITA No

ITA 193/ASR/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar13 Jun 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 115BSection 143(3)Section 144C(8)Section 250oSection 69C

249 to 253 and the returned income of the assessee was accepted. [Judgments on the issue that carbon credits are capital receipts upto AY 2017-18 are attached in the Indexed Judgment Set] 16. It is also submitted herewith that consistency has to be maintained in the Income Tax Proceedings also as per the following judgments: a. CIT Vs/ DalmiaDadri