BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “depreciation”+ Section 153A(1)(b)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai478Delhi386Bangalore198Hyderabad112Jaipur78Chennai73Pune58Amritsar45Ahmedabad42Cochin36Indore29Chandigarh28Kolkata25Visakhapatnam24Karnataka22Nagpur19Raipur17Guwahati16Cuttack9Rajkot9Lucknow7Kerala5Allahabad4Dehradun4Surat3Jodhpur2Rajasthan1SC1Telangana1Jabalpur1

Key Topics

Section 153A10Section 1326Section 153A(1)(b)6Disallowance4Addition to Income4Undisclosed Income4Section 143(1)3Section 36(1)3Section 271(1)(c)3Penalty

KESARWANI & C0,,ALLAHABAD vs. JT CIT,, ALLAHABAD

In the result the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 390/ALLD/2014[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad29 Nov 2024AY 2007-08
For Appellant: Sh. Praveen Godbole, C.AFor Respondent: Sh. Neel Jain, CIT DR
Section 132Section 143(1)Section 153ASection 153A(1)(b)Section 271(1)(c)Section 36(1)

b) dated 20.12.2011, as being passed without jurisdiction. It denied its liability to be assessed under block assessment in the absence of any valid action under section 132 and it also submitted, that since the undisclosed income was not determined on the basis of any search material but framed in a manner similar to normal assessment, the additions made were

3

KESARWANI & C0.,ALLAHABAD vs. JT.CIT., ALLAHABAD

In the result the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 392/ALLD/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad29 Nov 2024AY 2009-10
For Appellant: Sh. Praveen Godbole, C.AFor Respondent: Sh. Neel Jain, CIT DR
Section 132Section 143(1)Section 153ASection 153A(1)(b)Section 271(1)(c)Section 36(1)

b) dated 20.12.2011, as being passed without jurisdiction. It denied its liability to be assessed under block assessment in the absence of any valid action under section 132 and it also submitted, that since the undisclosed income was not determined on the basis of any search material but framed in a manner similar to normal assessment, the additions made were

KESARWANI & CO.,ALLAHABAD vs. JT.CIT,, ALLAHABAD

In the result the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 389/ALLD/2014[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad29 Nov 2024AY 2005-06
For Appellant: Sh. Praveen Godbole, C.AFor Respondent: Sh. Neel Jain, CIT DR
Section 132Section 143(1)Section 153ASection 153A(1)(b)Section 271(1)(c)Section 36(1)

b) dated 20.12.2011, as being passed without jurisdiction. It denied its liability to be assessed under block assessment in the absence of any valid action under section 132 and it also submitted, that since the undisclosed income was not determined on the basis of any search material but framed in a manner similar to normal assessment, the additions made were

M/S BHOLA FOOD PRODUCTS(P) LTD.,ALLAHABAD vs. JT. CIT,(OSD),, ALLAHABAD

In the result, both the appeals filed by assessee for ay: 2005-06 and 2009-10

ITA 66/ALLD/2013[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad03 Mar 2021AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri.Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

For Appellant: Mr. Praveen Godbole, CAFor Respondent: Mr. Debashish Chanda, CIT-DR
Section 132(1)Section 153A

b) of the income tax act and vide which income as determined at Rs. 3,15,17,675.00 is highly unjustified and incorrect in the facts and circumstances of the case and the entire observations, findings and allegation in the order for making the additions are totally false and incorrect. 2. That in any view of the matter facts